, 28 2020 . 18:26
+
Filadelfia19
, 27 . , (G8) , .
Rheinische Post.
" [ G8] . [ ] , ", - , G8 .
, , , ,
G7 , , , "G7 G20 ". " G11 G12", - .
, " ".
G7 - , , , , , , .
1975 , , , , . .
"" 1976 1997 . " ". 2014 "".
, , .
.ru
_____
facebook.com/Dmitry.Medvedev
--- English text below ---
G8 , . , , , . , , G8, , , , . .
G7 G20 . ,
. , , - . . ...
_____________
Our former G8 companions keep moaning about not letting Russia back until it returns Crimea and fixes the situation in Donbass. Moreover, it has been said frequently that no one needs the G8 as it stands, that the world has changed a lot and nothing can be discussed without having China or India at the table. By the way, when I took part in the G8, there were attempts to engage these countries through what was called an outreach format, on an understanding that it was a necessity. Otherwise, discussions would seem deficient.
Overall, considering the existence of the G20 and other international frameworks, G7 value is highly doubtful. Nonetheless, they continue chanting their mantras about Crimea and Ukraine over and over again as a condition for restoring the G8. At the same time, they realise that Crimea has returned to Russia for good, while the settlement in the southeast is Ukraines business. Besides, there is no need for Russia to revive obsolete platforms for discussing international matters. You cannot step into the same river twice
:
G8
G8
: 2