-Видео

Семья #3
Смотрели: 105 (3)

 -Фотоальбом

Фотоальбом закрыт для неавторизованных. Зарегистрироваться!

 -Статистика

Статистика LiveInternet.ru: показано количество хитов и посетителей
Создан: 23.05.2008
Записей: 222
Комментариев: 2141
Написано: 4649


CATCH-22 by Joseph Heller

Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 01:03 + в цитатник
I can't believe that I have finally finished this book! It took me five whole months to do it, which, taking into consideration that I'm a very fast reader and generally enjoy most of the fiction I happen to come across, is unbelievable. During these five months, I've actually returned "Catch-22" to the library two or three times when I got particularly frustrated; then cooled off a bit and tried my best to gave it another shot. Not surprisingly, having finally turned the last page of "Catch-22", I can officially declare that this Joseph Heller's "masterpiece" is the worst book I have ever read. So far, it is the second book on the list that I hated, but comparing to it, "Clockwork Orange" actually was a very easy and enjoyable read.

To be honest, I can't even tell what "Catch-22" was about. Moreover, I have a very strong suspicion that Heller was on crack when writing it. The whole story is based on life of a young man, Yossarian, who servers in the US forces in Italy during the Second World War. This story, however, is no more than a collection of chapters devoid of both chronological order and meaning that constantly jump from one topic, character, or event to another. All of the events happening in the book are an absolute nonsense, which, I guess, is supposed to be satirical or at least funny. I did understand that, in choosing this style of narration, one of the author's intention was perhaps to criticize how absurd can bureaucracy in the military or elsewhere be, but, unfortunately, this understanding did not make reading the book any more pleasant.

To summarize my experience, I can just say that "Catch-22" is a pretty long book, and I was confused for the most part of it. I could hardly keep track of the characters and events, which only added to my frustration. Only a few of hundreds of absurd situations described by the author have made me laugh, but it definitely was more of a hysterical giggle caused by my brain boiling from all the confusing information. If the author, indeed, had some point he wanted to bring across, he has lost me after just a few chapters. Finally, "Catch-22", in my opinion, is similar of some of those very abstract paintings, like "Black Square" by Malevich: People claim to admire them because some bunch of drunken critics once said that it was a good thing, but quietly think that it was a total waste of both paper and their time.

Осталось прочесть 15 произведений списка
Рубрики:  Literature Review
Метки:  

Iron-Orchid   обратиться по имени Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 03:15 (ссылка)
MiaGellar, My ex didn't finish it, because, as he told me "the jokes began to repeat themselves", but overall I remember him saying it was a very funny read.

Now, about the above mentioned "Black Square": I've heard so many people saying how much they hate the thing or don't understand what the whole fuss is about. I actually think it is a very special piece of art, because it doesn't tell you what to see, but gives you a chance to see anything you want. Looking into it is like looking into yourself, asking questions, finding answers and everytime it is going to be something different. It is also going to be differ for different people.

That's the whole purpose of abstract art- to discover yourself before everything else and that's why I like it. I have a lot of favorite pieces. Mark Rothko "White Center" is one of them, for example. When I first saw it, I couldn't escape the vision of a throbbing heart, warm and open.

I don't think abstract art is my favorite, but I love it for the freedom it gives me, freedom to see and feel anything I want.
 (155x180, 8Kb)
Ответить С цитатой В цитатник
CrimeanGurl   обратиться по имени Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 03:29 (ссылка)
Iron-Orchid, I would call "Catch-22" a comedy of the absurd, which is not my favorite kind. Overall, throughout the book, because of numerous characters and out of chronological order events, I was trying too hard to keep track of what was going on, which didn't leave me any chance to appreciate the humor.

As far as abstract art is concerned, I guess, it is just not for everyone :)) Being not a very creative person, I simply don't have enough imagination to go beyond what I actually see.
Ответить С цитатой В цитатник
Iron-Orchid   обратиться по имени Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 03:38 (ссылка)
MiaGellar, (I'm determined to convert you ;)) Have you ever had abstract dreams, when it's all about feeling, rather than actual images? Or have you in the middle of the day sort of stopped and stared for a few seconds, as if looking inside rather than out? It's just like that. I don't think there are people who are born to love or understand abstract art, we are already understand it, it's just that most of the time we are closed off and prefer to deal with tangible realities. I have no doubt you'll find your abstract piece you will love.
Ответить С цитатой В цитатник
Taikhe   обратиться по имени Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 03:41 (ссылка)
Это топ-10 моих любимых книг! Мне ее два года назад дала учительница по английскому, и я до сих пор жалею, что я её уже прочитала. Это просто восторг! Первые главы было тяжело читать, потому что не понимала еще сюжета. но потом...Мне становится смешно уже когда я вспоминаю о том, как майор Майор прятался от Йоссариана. А как он спросил на собрании про того парня, который умер в самолете - это же какая игра слов там была (я не говорю об эмоциональной составляющей). Вот уж чего не было - так не было скучно. Местами было сложно из-за той самой игры слов, но в целом...Я прочитала её два года назад, я до сих пор помню отрывки.
Кстати, моя личная ассоциация с этой книгой - Сто лет одиночества. Та же монотонность, только здесь облаченная в черный юмор.
Порекомендовала ее маме (слава богу, ее перевели на русский язык) - ей тоже очень понравилось. Мне вообще кажется, что он достоин большей известности, но из-за того, что книга была запрещена какое-то время - увы.
Ответить С цитатой В цитатник
CrimeanGurl   обратиться по имени Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 04:00 (ссылка)
Taikhe, всем не угодишь - я оказалась одной из немногих, судя по 4.5 звездочкам заработанной этой книгой на Амазоне, которым автору угодить не удалось :)) Хотя, на самом деле, я очень easy to please в плане литературы; за всю свою читательскую жизнь я наткнулась на очень маленькое книг, которые я бросила в середине или дочитала с огромным трудом. Может быть через несколько лет я заставлю себя перечитать эту книгу и, уже зная сюжет, смогу получить и удовольствие от ее юмористическо-сатирической части...
Ответить С цитатой В цитатник
CrimeanGurl   обратиться по имени Пятница, 23 Октября 2009 г. 04:09 (ссылка)
Iron-Orchid, haha, I don't think I'm easily convertible :)) ( "it's just that most of the time we are closed off and prefer to deal with tangible realities" -- that's very much about me! Unfortunately, I simply don't pay much attention to the world surrounding me :( For example, I can appreciate a beautiful landscape or a flower, but I don't really care about either as much as some other people do...The same is with art - I can appreciate how accurately and beautifully a painter has translated real world to the canvas, but I don't see much further than that...
Ответить С цитатой В цитатник
Комментировать К дневнику Страницы: [1] [Новые]
 

Добавить комментарий:
Текст комментария: смайлики

Проверка орфографии: (найти ошибки)

Прикрепить картинку:

 Переводить URL в ссылку
 Подписаться на комментарии
 Подписать картинку