Shuhratjon AHMADJONOV

(CONTINUED 13) 2010-2024 – COMPLAINT-STATEMENT: CRIMES OF USA FBI AGENTS AND THE WAY OF EVIDENCE

5.11. MY REJECTION OF US CITIZENSHIP

PARAGRAPH 222. I have been living in the US since January 2010 as a refugee and have not yet become a US citizen. Firstly, for more than 13 years a group of people in civilian clothes have been spying and provocations against me. I'm assuming they are agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and/or people associated with the FBI. It is they who photograph and film me, and organize this with the help of street informers and informers day and night for more than 13 years. In my opinion, based on these photos and videos, it was these people who organized 19 thefts and 4 robberies against me from November 2012 to June 2021. The police and the FBI did not investigate, or rather they did not allow these crimes to be investigated, and the criminals were not punished.

Secondly, this group of persecutors in civilian clothes have been trying to use punitive psychiatry against me for more than 13 years and thereby try to deprive me of my basic human rights. They did not investigate 19 thefts and 4 robberies with the help of punitive psychiatry. I wrote in a long article [42] about the use of punitive psychiatry in the US against dissidents, especially unemployed and homeless dissenters. In the future I will try to write a separate large article on punitive psychiatry in the United States, God willing.

Thirdly, this group of stalkers in civilian clothes is not controlled by anyone in the USA and they do whatever they want against me, especially at night. I partially wrote about these illegal acts in a statement-complaint [99] in Russian and [100] in English addressed to the President of the United States in December 2020. I will additionally write about this in articles in the future, if the Lord God permits.

I still have the status of a refugee and a citizen of a foreign state - Uzbekistan. If in this status they continue to persecute me for more than twelve years, then what will happen if I take US citizenship? It's hard to imagine. For these reasons, I have not yet taken US citizenship.

As a continuation of these persecutions and crimes, they deprived me of my old age pension (see paragraph 221). Discrimination against me continued on the issue of cash assistance during the pandemic (see paragraph 225).

5.12. RENTAL LOCK

PARAGRAPH 223. The FBI blocked my rent by blocking my phone and other means. Even when I found and rented a room, I was kicked out under various pretexts (see paragraphs 104, 105 and 125). For the above reasons, during the pandemic from March 2020 to September 6, 2022, I spent the night in hostels paying monthly from $800 to $1085. I will write in more detail in a separate article about misadventures, bullying and blocking on the issue of renting housing (studio) from May 2014 to November 2021, God willing.

5.13. FINANCIAL AID LOCK

PARAGRAPH 224. It is known that in the United States, quarantine was announced on March 13, 2020. The US leadership has allocated $2.3 trillion in financial assistance to US residents. They paid individual residents $1,200 in mid-April and $600 weekly thereafter. The US government did not provide financial assistance to me during the pandemic. Until December 14, 2020, I was not paid a single dollar.

How am I coping during a pandemic? First, I spent all my savings in the bank. Secondly, I borrowed money. Thirdly, from July 1, 2020, the printing of the Street Sense newspaper was resumed. I sell Street Sense daily, that is, seven days a week. Although it is dangerous in a pandemic because of the danger of contracting a coronavirus. Let me remind you: in the United States today - May 22, 2023, more than 107 million 42 thousand people fell ill with coronavirus. Of these, more than 1 million 164 thousand people died ([101]). For comparison: during the First World War in the United States, 53,402 people died, and in the Second World War - 291,557 people ([102]). Until Allah (Lord God) save me from this deadly disease. Thank the Lord God. Fourthly, my customers of the Street Sense newspaper help me financially. Thank them.

I have been working as a vendor (street seller) for the Street Sense newspaper since the end of October 2012. I applied for financial assistance to Ms. Lissa Ramsepaul, Director of Case Management, Street Sense on April 13, 2020. To no avail.

I contacted Ms. Lissa Ramsepaul in mid-June 2020. I said: "Please provide me with a copy of the document being sent to the IRS" (Internal Revenue Service). She refused. I told her: “This document concerns me personally. Therefore, I have the right to familiarize myself with it. She again refused to provide a copy of the completed and sent document. Apparently, she wanted to write some kind of slander, slander, slander about me in this document and therefore did not want to give me a copy of it.

I turned to Mr. Brine Cerome, CEO of Street Sense Media, for help. But Mrs. Lissa Ramsepaul refused even Mr. Brian Karom. This is contrary to the First Amendment of the US Constitution on freedom of speech. So someone, probably FBI agents, she was promised protection from such illegal actions ... I think Mrs. Lissa Ramsepaul discriminated against me because I am a Muslim, a refugee and not a US citizen.

I filled out a regular Form 1040 and mailed it June 23, 2020 by certified mail with notice to the IRS at 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224. The notice card was returned to my mailing address in August 2020. I did not receive any response from them until December 14, 2020. I am sure that the reason for the refusal of financial assistance and the persecution was my human rights and journalistic activities.

I wrote and sent a large complaint to U.S. leaders and international human rights organizations on September 8 and December 14, 2020, asking: “Please help me receive the financial assistance promised by the U.S. Government during the pandemic” (see [103], [104]).

RESULT: I received a letter from the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. Kansas City, MO 64999-0010 on February 3, 2021. Inside the envelope was a letter and a check for $600 for the second half of 2020. I received my next check for $1400 on April 9, 2021 for the first half of 2021. Many thanks to everyone who assisted me in paying for the US Government cash aid.

And Mrs. Lissa Ramsepaul soon left the office of the Street Sense newspaper. Perhaps her patrons were transferred to another organization with another assignment ...

5.14. DAMAGE OF MY BELONGINGS

PARAGRAPH 225. FBI agents and people associated with them damaged many of my personal belongings. They arranged in Boise to bake my bicycle chamber about a hundred times and steal it, in Washington DC they turned off three keys of my laptop, replaced my new boots with the same boots of a small size, tore the pullover jumper, broke the support of the stroller, damaged my shoes and so on.

5.14.1. DAMAGE AND THEFT OF THE BIKE

PARAGRAPH 226. FBI agents and people associated with them began to damage my personal belongings in Boise in 2010. I wrote in paragraph 22 that on April 18, 2010, I moved into a separate apartment at 585 S. Curtis Rd., #8, Boise, Idaho 83705. A few days later I bought and started riding a bike.

I lived in the eighth apartment. Arabs lived in the next seventh apartment, in my opinion refugees from Iraq. Two of them wore earrings on their ears. In my opinion they watched me and organized various provocations, including a puncture of my bike tube. They punctured the bike tube on the second day. I returned home on foot. They stood on the second floor and looked at me as I lifted my bike. They asked a question. I replied that the bicycle tube was pierced.

I have had a bike since I was a child and have often repaired it. I went to the store and bought rubber glue. I took off the wheel and looked: I saw a thorn in the tire, which pierced the chamber. He opened the camera and determined the place of the puncture in the bathtub on the water. I cut out a round piece of rubber from the old camera and glued it. Checked again on the water. It was ok. Got the wheel. One of the Arabs knocked on the door. I opened. He asked about the bike. I showed the finished bike. He was very surprised that I recovered so quickly.

PARAGRAPH 227. Between April 18, 2010 and the end of December 2010, FBI agents and people associated with them punctured my bike tube about a hundred times. I sometimes drove along the federal highway towards the center of Boise to the mosque for prayer. Once I noticed: a man's hand poked out of an overtaking car and threw something onto the edge of the track. I drove a little and the front wheel chamber went down. He stopped and looked: a thorn was visible on the tire. This happened twice. So, they overtook me in a car and scattered thorns. They also used other methods.

PARAGRAPH 228. The question arises: what is the main reason? Those who followed me and those who pierced the tube of my bicycle counted on the following: after the first or several piercings, I would call the police. Naturally, the police will not find the culprit. And the attackers will continue to pierce the bicycle chamber. According to their calculations, I should have called the police again. The police will not find the criminals again. And then they will come forward with the accusation that I have a persecution mania. In psychiatry, there is a diagnosis of "Persecutory delusion". Here I will provide information about this concept.

“A persecutory delusion or persecution complex is a common type of delusional condition in which the affected person believes that harm is going to occur to oneself by a persecutor, despite a clear lack of evidence. The person may believe that they are being targeted by an individual or a group of people. Persecution delusions are very diverse in terms of content and vary from the possible, albeit improbable, to the completely bizarre. The delusion can be found in a multitude of disorders, being more usual in psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and delusional disorder." [105]

I have been involved in human rights advocacy since 1974. In 2010, as a human rights activist with 36 years of experience, I knew well that such a provocation and nonsense of persecution. Therefore, I did not call the police even after repeated piercings. I bought four gram superglue at Fred Meyer for $3.50 and glued rubber patches where the camera holes were. At that time, I did not have a pump and I asked for a pump from the refugee residents living in neighboring houses. I bought a new pump in September 2010. In the future, went with the pump on hand. As they pierced, I pumped up the camera and drove home. Sometimes he pumped air several times.

A fact for comparison: in 2010, more than 310 million people lived in the United States (now about 335 million), apparently only I rode a bicycle with a pump on my hands. Even car drivers drove without a pump: I sometimes asked to borrow a pump to inflate the bicycle tube for a while. The drivers did not have a pump: in any case, they answered me that they did not have a pump in their car.

Sometimes they pierced and formed a large hole in the chamber. In this case, inflation with a pump was useless. Then I rode the bus paying one dollar for one trip. If the puncture was after 6:45 pm or on a Sunday, then the bus in Boise did not run at that time and I walked home on foot through the entire city of Boise. I tried not to succumb to the provocations of the FBI agents and did not call the police. But all patience eventually comes to an end. This end of patience came on January 7, 2011 (see paragraph 230).

PARAGRAPH 229. In the summer of 2010, I was told at the IRC office in Boise that there was a free English as a second language course for adults and was given his address (I don't remember his address now). I signed up and started studying in a group. The teacher was very kind and experienced. As I wrote in paragraph 33, on July 28, 2010, I was supposed to start work at the Thrift Store. So I switched my studies from day to evening group. In Boise, public buses do not operate after 6:45 p.m. in the evening. I came to class on my bike. I leave the class, and the bicycle chamber is pierced by some sharp object. I pumped up the air with a pump, but because of the big hole it was useless. I left on foot. A few days later, the bike's inner tube was pierced again. I walked home again for more than one hour. After that, I stopped going to college. So in the USA, the FBI agents and people associated with them did not give me the opportunity to study in English courses. In doing so, they violated my constitutional right to education.

PARAGRAPH 230. On January 7, 2011, I went shopping at WinCO FOOD (8200 W Fairview Ave, Boise, ID 83704) in the evening. I leave the supermarket and see: some provocateur with a sharp object in the form of an awl again pierced the front chamber and rearranged my bike by turning it 180 degrees. There was a video camera here and the attacker was supposed to be shown on the videotape. So I dialed 911 on my phone and called the police.

15-20 minutes passed, and no police. I look around, including inside the store. Suddenly, inside the store, behind the glass doors, I see a male informer who worked in our trade organization Society of St. Vincent de Paul. He looked intently in my direction. I wrote about him in paragraph 36 as the second male informer. Apparently he organized, or pierced the chamber of my bike himself. He asked if I had left or if I was waiting. In my opinion, he saw me and decided to destroy the video from the video cameras of the store. If he had an FBI agent ID, then he himself can order the destruction of the video. If he did not have such a certificate, then he can call his leader, an FBI agent, by phone, and with his help achieve the destruction of the video.

Officer Watkins and Lieutenant Lipple of the Boise Police Department arrived an hour later. Watkins wrote the words on a piece of paper: report number (report #) 100-591. Lipple offered to take me home. I froze for this 1.5 hours and agreed. The police officers did not provide an interpreter, did not organize the viewing of the videotape, and so on.

I am from the Boise Police Department on February 3, 2011 received a copy of the two-page protocol signed by Rosemary Miko dated February 1, 2011. They are attached in my complaint dated October 13-21, 2010 (in English and Russian, see [17]). In particular, the following is written there.

“DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY/EVIDENCE/WEAPONS:
After looking at the tire there was no noticeable cut marks, slashes to the tire. The tire appeared to be older tire possibly just damaged from all the rocks in the tire”

By that time my bike was a mountain bike and the tire was made thick enough. Therefore, not one thorn could not pierce it. January 7, 2011 I inspected the tire. There were no thorns. I insisted on organizing the viewing of the videotape of January 7, 2011, together with a police officer. There must have been an intruder who punctured my bike and caused material damage to my personal property many times. But they refused.

PARAGRAPH 231. I wrote a complaint to Mr. Clement Leroy, Governor of Idaho, and on February 18, 2011, I submitted it to the office. On February 23 and 25, 2011, I delivered a copy of the complaint to Boise Mayor Mr. David H. Bieter, Idaho State Senator Mr. Elliot Werk, Representatives (deputies) of the Idaho House of Representatives, Mr. Bill Killen and Ms. Sue Chew.

On February 21, 2011, I published the text of the complaint with attachments in the article “I am also persecuted in the USA (article 1)” (see [18]). At the end of the complaint wrote so.

“As a human rights activist and journalist, I have the only way to protect myself from such intruders - to write and publish an article about the bad, illegal “deeds” of these special services and inform good people about it. I will not be the first and not the last victim of these intruders. They can use this or similar methods against other dissident US citizens and refugees.

My letters, personal e-mails, the computer is constantly controlled by some people. I hoped to live in the USA freely within the laws of the USA. But this turned out to be an illusion: they control everything, and moreover, they are engaged in wrecking, damaging personal property. Just think: from April 2010 to January, my bike inner tube was pierced about a hundred times. I have no one to expect protection from such hidden iniquity.

I have four questions: 1. Will the monitoring, covert interference with my personal e-mail, wiretapping and monitoring of my computer cease?

2. We have a lot of problems in Uzbekistan. I deal mainly with the problems of Uzbekistan. I don't deal with US issues. Then the questions arise: why do some intelligence officers and their henchmen need to collect slanderous, denigrating material against me? For what purpose do they covertly disseminate such information in a democratic, free country? After filing this complaint, they provide you with various information about me. If they have claims against me, let them tell me frankly and, if possible, in writing.

3. Will the videotape of January 7, 2011 be watched with a police officer? There should be visible an intruder who punctured my bike and caused material damage to my personal property many times.

4. As I wrote above: On February 3, 2011, I received from the Boise Police Department a copy of the protocol on two sheets signed by Rosemary Miko dated February 1, 2011. I am attaching them. Please pay attention. At the end is written: “CONCLUSION: Route to file” (“CONCLUSION: Route to file”). Where is this file and what is written in it? Will this file be presented to me for review?” [18]

PARAGRAPH 232. 40 days have passed. But there was no response from the mayor of Boise, a senator and two deputies. Therefore, on April 4, 2011, I came to them. On April 5, 2011, at 10:00 am on my mobile phone, Senator Elliott Werk called and invited me to a meeting at the school building at 7:00 pm. On April 5, I met and spoke with Senator Elliott Werk, MPs Bill Killen, and Sue Chu.


Photo 54. Representatives (deputies) of the Idaho House of Representatives, Mr. Bill Killen, Ms. Sue Chew, and Idaho State Senator, Mr. Elliot Werk. Boise. 2010.

One interesting fact: In early 2012, I sent an e-mail to Mr. Elliot Werk. I arrived and talked to him in his office the same day. He greeted me and asked: “I sent you a letter today. Did you receive it?" He looked at his mail on his laptop and said, "Your letter is gone." Just then a burly man of about 40 wearing a cap appeared outside the door, gently knocked on the glass of the door and called Mr. Elliot Werk. He went out and spoke to him outside the door. I told the senator: "FBI agents even control your mail and block letters sent to you." He did not respond to my words. Like this: in the US, FBI agents control even senators and sometimes block letters sent to him.

On the evening of April 6, 2011, I had a written reply in my mailbox from the Chief of the Boise Police Department, Mr. Michael F. Masterson. Below is the letter.


Photo 55. Response from Chief of the Boise Police Department, Mr. Michael F. Masterson. April 5, 2011.

“Boise Police Department
April 5, 2011
Mr. Shuhratjon Ahmadjonov
585 S. Curtis Rd. Apt. # 8
Boise ID 83705

Dear Mr. Ahmadjonov,

On February 23, 2011, the Mayor's Office received a letter from you stating your concerns regarding a vandalism report filed with the Boise Police Department. The Mayor's Office forwarded your letter to the Boise Police Department and asked that we look into your concerns. The Office of Internal Affairs conducted an investigation into the matter and hopes this letter will address your concerns and provide to you an understanding of the Boise Police Department process relating to property crime reports.

The investigation revealed that CSS Watkins responded to your call and did take a report from you. The video footage was not reviewed or collected, as there was no evidence to indicate that a crime had occurred. CSS Watkins inspected your bike tire and found no evidence that it had been tampered with or vandalized. Given the circumstances, a report would not normally be required. However, officers knew it was important to you to document the situation and therefore decided to take a report. In these instances, the report would normally be routed to the case file, as there was no crime, no suspect information and no investigative leads. When a case is “routed to the file” it means that it is being kept as an official record but no further investigation is being done on the case at this time. Your report will remain on file as an official police record and can be referred back to in the future.

I understand the officers also gave you a ride home and transported your bike to your residence. Officers are not obligated to provide this service but due to the weather conditions and the fact you had no transportation, they felt it was in your best interest to give you a ride home. The investigation could find no wrongdoing on the part of the officers as they handled the call within the guidelines of the Boise Police Department Policy and Procedures.

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Please feel free to contact the Office of Internal Affairs at 570-6160 if you have any further questions or concerns regarding this matter. A representative from the Office of Internal Affairs would be happy to meet with you and your interpreter to discuss the matter in more detail.

sincerely,
signature
Michael F. Masterson
Chief of Police”

Apparently, Mr. Michael F. Masterson sent a similar letter to Elliot Werk, Bill Killen and Sue Chu. On April 23, 2011, I received a similar letter signed by Elliot Werk, Bill Killen and Sue Chu.

PARAGRAPH 233. I was very busy from the beginning of April to June 2011 - I wrote and published eight long articles on the protection of human rights (see [106]-[113]). It is appropriate to say that from January 7 to June 30, 2011, the attackers punctured my bicycle only four times. There were no video cameras in these places. That's why I didn't call the police.

On June 30, 2011, I came to the Boise Police Department. I was interviewed by Captain Scott Mulcahy and Regina Fredricks. I submitted a statement in English and Russian to the Chief of the Police Department, Michael F. Masterson. The copy of the statement in English was signed by Scott Mulcahy. Captain Scott Mulcahy wrote the following with his left hand: “No video of incident WinCO. Did not keep video – there was nothing on the video” (see photo 55).


Photo 56. Police Captain Scott Mulcahy's response. June 30, 2011. [23]

In short, the police officers refused to show me a video filmed on a video camera on the evening of January 7, 2011 near the WinCO FOOD store. Thus, they did not want to solve this crime. Since in these video frames the face of the criminal should be visible - possibly an FBI agent.

Let's imagine: at the place where my bicycle was punctured, an American citizen was beaten or killed or his personal property was damaged. Then the police officers would thoroughly study this video and it would be attached to the criminal case. I am not an American citizen, but a simple refugee. Therefore, police officers treated my problems - vandalism, damage to my personal property very badly and did not want to solve this crime. More precisely, they simply covered up this crime and those criminals.

The police officers were required to attach the videotape dated January 7, 2011 to this case. But they did not fulfill this important official duty. Apparently they did not want to solve the crime committed with the participation of an FBI agent.

PARAGRAPH 234. On October 16, 2011, my bicycle was stolen. I called the police. On November 21, 2011, he wrote to the head of the Police Department. November 25, 2011 received a second written response from the head of the Police Department. He wrote about the theft of a bicycle and a written response in the article “Provocation by theft. (They continue to persecute me in the USA. Article 7)” (see [26]).

I personally thank the Chief of the Boise Police Department for his careful attention to my complaint, in the analysis of the facts and for sending me a written response.

After my bicycle was stolen, I walked for almost two months: I had neither a car nor a bicycle. On December 9, 2011, after Friday prayers in the mosque, one of the Muslims offered to help in buying a bicycle and offered to go to the store with him by car. At the store on Vista Street, I chose an inexpensive bike. He paid $52.47 for the bike through his credit card. After the purchase, we left the store. I thanked them and rode my bike home.

When I got home, I took a closer look at the bike. I look: there is no tire nipple on both wheels of the bicycle and there is a usual hole in the place of the nipple. I remembered: in the USA they make semi-rigid circular rubber tires for bicycles. This rubber is put on the wheel rim and a tire is put on top. There are no tires on these bikes and it is impossible to make a hole in it.

But my biking adventures didn't end there. FBI agents are highly experienced and highly skilled at provocation. They often carry out a provocation with the help of another official or person. It's been exactly a week since I bought my second bike. December 16, 2011 in the morning I ride my bike on the sidewalk to work. In the middle of the road, a police officer staged a provocation and fined.

PARAGRAPH 235. The following facts have been copied from my article “Provocation and a fine on the sidewalk” (see [27]). On the morning of December 16, 2011, I rode my bike along the sidewalk to work. Halfway I drive along Emerald Street. Emerald Street ends at the intersection with Latah Street. Further, this street is called Americana and go a little to the left and down.


Photo 57. Crossroads of Emerald and Latah streets. Place of provocation on December 16, 2011. On the right is my bike, bought on December 9, 2011. Boise. December 29, 2011.

Let me remind you: closer to the intersection with Latah street on the right there is Morris Hill Cemetery - a large cemetery of the Boise. On the left is the narrow Emerald Street: it is a two-lane two-way street. Moreover, there is no special lane for cyclists from the edge of the street. Therefore, cyclists pass on the sidewalk at this place.

At the intersection of Emerald and Latakh streets, closer to the traffic light, three men and one woman are standing on the sidewalk. There are three cars on the left side of the road (the fourth - a police car was at the very end of these cars). I approached them and asked them to give way. Nobody reacts at all. Approaching closer, I stopped the bicycle, approached them on foot and asked a little louder to let me through. The cop and his listeners could have just stepped back a little and let me down the sidewalk. But the policeman did not respond to my request.

I asked to be let through again and said that I was late for work. Three in civilian clothes look at the policeman, but he does not answer me. The cop put on a jacket. Therefore, there was no way to find out who he was. I asked: "What is your name?". He doesn't answer and the pavement doesn't yield. Although on the right - to the iron fence of the cemetery there is a distance of about 5 feet (1.5 meters), where grass grows. The cop and his listeners could have just stepped back a little and let me down the sidewalk. But the policeman did not respond to my request.

I took out a sheet of paper and a ballpoint pen from my pocket, and once again asked the name of the policeman. He came up to me, picked up my bike, leaned it on the fence of the cemetery and asked me to wait. I asked his name again. He turned on his radio and said something to someone through the radio. He then returned to those three and continued his association with them. I understood: he called the traffic policeman on the radio and therefore demanded to wait.

I leaned my bike against the fence and waited. At this time, I paid attention to the damage to the machines. Both were cars. It looked like one car hit another from behind. The front end and headlight of the parked car were badly broken, but there was not a single piece of broken glass around it. A small sheet and a few small parts lay on the side of the road between two cars. The car standing in front of me behind had no traces of the accident, I did not even see scratches. Having lived for almost 58 years, I first saw such a strange accident, where one car in front was badly smashed, and the other had almost no signs of a collision, and there were also no pieces of glass from a broken headlight.

While waiting, I looked around: behind these cars was the fourth - a police car with the lights on and had the number BPD 071 (BPD - Boise Police Department).

Ten minutes later, a traffic police car arrived. The first policeman explained the situation to the second policeman. The second policeman approached me and demanded my documents. I gave him my Idaho ID and green card. He went to his police car and used a computer to check the validity of my documents. Then he came up to me, opened an office notebook and began to fill out a standard form for a fine. I wrote on a piece of paper the number of his car: BPD 013.

He approached me and started asking questions about my home address and Social Security number. I, in turn, asked: why did the policeman detain me? He replied. Among his phrases were the words "bicycle" and "sidewalk". I asked him in English: "In Boise cyclist driving on the sidewalk is forbidden?" He again accused me of something. I said that I understood very little and asked for an interpreter. But he did not answer anything concerning the interpreter. He asks for my height, weight, and eye color, and continues to fill out the fine form.

He finished filling out the fine form and gave me one copy. I asked for his name. He pointed to the form of the fine, on which the names of both policemen were written. Thus, the surname of the first policeman B.Griffin, and the second - D.Saindon. The number 1485778 was written on the form of the fine, and had entries on both sides of the sheet. I am enclosing a photocopy of the first page of the fine form (see Photo 58).


Photo 58. Photocopy of the first page of the fine form, in which police officer D.Saindon issued a fine on December 16, 2011.

Police officer D. Saindon wrote as the reason for the fine on the form: “Failure to yield right of way to pedestrians on sidewalk while on bicycle”.

Firstly, they - police officer B. Griffin and three citizens were standing on the sidewalk, and they did not ask me to pass. On the contrary, I asked to be let through: they did not give way to the sidewalk and they did not let me through. Secondly, I stopped and dismounted, that is, I was also a pedestrian. Then I asked them to let me through. Therefore, the accusation of police officers B. Griffin and D. Saindon “I didn’t give way to pedestrians on the sidewalk while riding a bicycle” is an unfounded and provocative accusation against me.

Mr. D. Saindon showed me the amount of the fine on the reverse side of the sheet: 56.50 US dollars. He returned my personal documents.

PARAGRAPH 236. It is appropriate to emphasize: in 68 years of my life I have not heard or read about the punishment (fine) of a cyclist who drove along the sidewalk, stopped and asked for a way to pass. The question arises: for what purpose was a provocation organized against me and a fine on the sidewalk?

In the penalty form, the deadline for payment or refusal was indicated on January 6, 2012 (see [28]). On January 6, 2012, I came to the Ada District Court and said that this fine was illegal and I refused to pay. I was scheduled to meet with a prosecutor for February 28, 2012.

On February 28, 2012, 10 minutes before my scheduled time, I rode my bike to the Boise City Attorney's Office. The employee said it would take place at the Ada District Courthouse at 200 W.Front Street, Boise.

I come to the district court of Ada. At the direction of the court employee, I go up to the fourth floor and go into the assigned room in the 400th room. A prosecutor's office employee A. Carroll asked me several questions in a separate room through an Uzbek translator, including about the fine. I replied that I did not violate the laws of the United States and the state of Idaho, and therefore I would not pay a fine. I asked to be acquainted with the case and the accusation written by the police officer. She did not give and invited to the courtroom.

Ten minutes later the judge and her assistant arrived. On the phone from another state, an Uzbek interpreter was involved. I asked to be given the opportunity to review the case. The judge allowed. The file contained an accusatory handwritten note at the end of the penalty form, written by a policeman. I asked for a copy of this accusation. The judge allowed it, and Ms. A. Carroll gave me a copy.

Below is a recording of a policeman in English.

“Additional Notes:

I was dealing w/a (with a, A.Sh.) 3 car accident at Emirald’s Latah (OR130288). Standing on sidewalk talking w (with, A.Sh.)/ subjects from crash. (S) (Subject, A.Sh.) riding eastbound on sidewalk stopped’s told us to move. I told him to go around us he refused. Became belligerent when I told him to go around. I explain we had the right of way officers. Called for Code 1’s asked Griffin to cite him for us so I could deal w (with, A.Sh.)/ accident”.

Yes, the police officer, as an official, had the right of way and use of the sidewalk. He had to indicate these rights by installing red plastic racks and on the sidewalk. They installed such plastic racks on the road, and the cars went around the scene of the accident. Installing the same stands in the sidewalk would have shown pedestrians and cyclists, including me, how to get around the sidewalk, occupied by the police and the drivers involved in the accident. And the police officer B. Griffin did not install red plastic racks, and thereby violated his official duties.

The judge on February 28, 2012 at the Ada District Court fixed the trial date for May 30, 2012 at 3:15 pm. I asked, “I was illegally fired from my job three times in Boise because of discrimination. I have been unemployed since January 5, 2012. I will have to leave Boise. I'm planning to go to Washington. Do I have the right to participate by telephone in court on May 30, 2012?” The judge replied, "Yes, you can."

It is appropriate to say: on February 28, 2012, I answered the questions of the judge. On this day and at this hour, the Sheriff’s Office employees from my rented apartment took out all my things, clothes, to the needle and thread. Then they locked the door with another lock and sealed it.

The main purpose of the organization of the provocation and the fine on the sidewalk on December 16, 2011 was the removal of all my belongings from my rented apartment.

As a result, I found myself without a job, without a rented apartment and without personal belongings. Under these conditions, the only correct solution is to leave the Boise. On March 2, 2012, I flew from Boise to Baltimore. On April 1, 2012, I began to live in the Washington. On April 13, 2012, he received an identification document (ID) from a Washington resident. I rewrote the above facts from my article “Trial in the USA Continues” (see [29]).

So, the provocation on the sidewalk on December 16, 2011 was arranged on purpose, so that later, on the day of the trial, all my belongings would be taken out of my rented apartment in my absence. So the disseminated information about democracy in the US is greatly exaggerated. This is the result of a lot of propaganda in the media about democracy in the US. In fact, special services also rule here, more precisely, FBI agents. And in most cases, the end result will be as the FBI agents want and order.

PARAGRAPH 237. The following facts I have copied from my article «Судилище в США продолжается» ("The Trial in the USA Continues", see [29]). On May 29, 2012, I came to the office of Bread for the City (1525 7th St., NW Washington, DC 20001-3201). I was interviewed by Wendy N. Guyton, Social Services Supervisor

I asked her to call the Ada District Court and inform me in advance of my desire to participate in the court by phone on May 30, 2012 at 3:15 pm, and also to order an interpreter from the Uzbek language. Wendy called and arranged on the phone with an employee of the district court of Ada. She gave me a phone card and a court phone number. I express my gratitude to Wendy.

On May 30, 2012 at 3:12 p.m. I called the Ada District Court at (208) 287-7070. A woman answered the phone. I told her my first and last name, the case number - IN-11-50568, about the phone call on May 29, 2012 and said my desire to participate in the trial. She said "Now" and after a while connected with a man.

At 15:40 Russian translator Valeria Kvitko answered the phone. I explained the situation to her in Russian and said: “Please connect with the judge.” She said, "I'll find out now. Then I'll call you."

Valeria called me at 3:50 and said: “In my opinion, it is impossible to participate in the court by phone. Since you did not come to Boise, the court apparently decided not in your favor. In another five minutes, the court will end the working day. If you do not agree with the decision of the court, then write a letter to the court. We said goodbye.

Please note: on May 29, 2012, I ordered in advance that I wish to participate in the trial on May 30. But the court staff did not connect me to the judge by phone. Thus, I was deprived of the right to participate in the court.

As I wrote in paragraph 107, from August 6 to August 15, 2015, I was in the Boise to protect the refugee Fazliddin Kurbanov. I went to the Ada District Court, and asked “Please, shown the $56.50 court case dated December 16, 2011". It turns out that this court case was not saved, or rather destroyed. Only some documents remained from the case, that is, multiple pages ...

TO BE CONTINUED