nika5 обратиться по имени
Четверг, 19 Мая 2005 г. 17:15 (ссылка)
любовь порой принимает причудливые и загадочные очертания. и даже иногда оставляет с разбитым сердцем...
и не только сердцем.
вот только, что одну романтическую влюбленную оправдали -
судья решил, что член Она - Ему поломала нечаянно - просто решила усилить стимуляцию :
a то чего это за секс такой без стимуляции.
из вчерашней газеты - долго ржала...
Tuesday, May 17, 2005 - Updated: 04:31 AM EST
A North Shore man who suffered a fractured penis while making love with his girlfriend cannot sue her for recklessness because the couple were engaged in consensual sex, the state Appeals Court ruled yesterday.
The decision upheld an Essex judge's February 2001 summary judgment against the man in a bizarre civil case known as ``John Doe'' vs. ``Mary Moe,'' to protect the couple's identities.
... But the facts can be pieced together from the appellate court's four-page ruling.
It all began when the couple was making love early in the morning of Sept. 14, 1994. ``John Doe'' was lying on his back, with his lover ``Mary Moe'' sitting astride him.
Suddenly, the woman ``decided to unlock her legs and place her feet astride of the plaintiff's abdomen for the purpose of increasing her stimulation,'' the ruling said.
Shortly afterward, ``Moe'' landed awkwardly on ``Doe,'' causing ``a penile fracture,'' in the court's words. The injury required emergency surgery and a lengthy recovery.
``Doe'' has since suffered from ``sexual dysfunction that neither medication nor counseling have been able to treat effectively,'' according to the court record.
``Doe'' later sued ``Moe'' for negligent sexual intercourse. But on the day the case came to trial in February 2001, Superior Court Judge Thomas Billings dismissed ``Doe's'' suit.
Фиолетовый_чулок обратиться по имени
Re: Еще один пост в liveinternet.ru Четверг, 19 Мая 2005 г. 14:19 (ссылка)
MontKristov обратиться по имени
Четверг, 19 Мая 2005 г. 14:20 (ссылка)