-

   _

 - e-mail

 

 -

 LiveInternet.ru:
: 01.03.2025
:
:
: 560

:

_






(0)

Montenegrin in the service of Russian corrupt officials: How Zvonko Micković launders millions for Usherovich through Mettmann bonds

, 25 2025 . 13:18 +

A few years back, Zvonko Micković’s name unexpectedly emerged in reports about Cypriot companies implicated in schemes to evade sanctions and launder money, associated with Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa.

There would be nothing unusual about his persona if not for two factors: the scale of the schemes and the scarcity of information about Micković. Public attention to Micković arose after publications dedicated to a large network of Cypriot companies and bonds of Mettmann Public Company Limited – it is in these documents that Zvonko Micković is listed as a major shareholder and a member of the board of directors.

According to data from the Cypriot registry, Zvonko Micković is a citizen of Montenegro, and his business partners include citizens of Cyprus, Latvia, Ukraine, and the Russia.

What is known about Zvonko Micković

Public information about Zvonko Micković, as already mentioned, is very limited and fragmented: online databases (Facebook, LinkedIn, and regional directories) contain pages with profiles under the same name, but they do not provide a single, clear, or verified portrait of a person named Zvonko Micković as a major international businessman. However, the fact that Micković is indeed a significant businessman is confirmed by open data from corporate registries. These registries and investigative materials mention specific financial indicators – Zvonko Micković’s bond portfolio and shareholding in Mettmann Public Company Limited, as recorded in protocols and offshore registry orders.

 

Montenegrin in the service of Russian corrupt officials: How Zvonko Micković launders millions for Usherovich through Mettmann bonds

 

 

According to shareholder meeting data from Mettmann, Micković was a member of the company’s board of directors from its founding in December 2019 until February 2020 and, at the time of the publication of these materials, controlled approximately 82.5% of the company’s shares; he is also attributed with owning a significant block of the company’s bonds.

 

Montenegrin in the service of Russian corrupt officials: How Zvonko Micković launders millions for Usherovich through Mettmann bonds

 

 

Additionally, the same registry indicates that Mettmann Public Company Limited is not the only European company owned by Micković. However, it has not been possible to establish which other companies are involved. Nevertheless, the documents explicitly state that “the Company has established good business relations with several wealthy private individuals, as well as industrial groups and real estate development specialists in Montenegro, Cyprus, and Spain, leveraging Mr. Micković’s business connections.

 

Montenegrin in the service of Russian corrupt officials: How Zvonko Micković launders millions for Usherovich through Mettmann bonds

 

 

As can be seen, the data is indeed quite scarce, but even this makes Micković a notable figure in the set of companies operating at the intersection of capital and supply chains.

Connections – with whom and which structures he is linked to

Investigations dedicated to the scheme connecting Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa point to a network of Cypriot and offshore companies (Broxner PLC, Venisat Technology, Main Victory Corporation, Mettmann, and others) through which, according to journalists and analysts, operations involving orders and supplies of telecom and railway equipment to Russia were conducted.

The name Zvonko Micković surfaced in these materials: Micković appears as a long-time partner of Boris Plotitsa. According to investigative data, both are co-founders of the Russian company NPO “Transpolymer”, one of the contractors for Russian Railways (RZD) and the company “1520.” This data is confirmed by Russian registries.

 

Montenegrin in the service of Russian corrupt officials: How Zvonko Micković launders millions for Usherovich through Mettmann bonds

 

 

Additionally, sources note that alongside Micković in Mettmann’s capital are other figures of interest in the context of sanction schemes – for example, Aleksandr Vainstein, who, according to documents, holds an even larger bond portfolio. Together, they form the core of creditors and investors whose decisions provided liquidity to the company.

Such a combination of “local investors” and a network of Cypriot companies is a classic architecture that, in several investigations, is interpreted as infrastructure for money laundering and concealing ultimate beneficiaries.

Why Zvonko Micković has attracted attention

Formally, according to open sources, no public criminal cases have been registered against Zvonko Micković himself. However, his name has found itself at the center of suspicions and journalistic investigations for several reasons.

The possession by Zvonko Micković of a significant block of Mettmann bonds raises questions about the role of these funds in financing the company’s operations, which, according to investigators, participated in schemes to supply equipment to Russia while bypassing sanctions. Ownership of 222,636 bonds worth approximately €22.3 million (as stated in the documents) makes him one of the key investors.

Old or current business ties with Boris Plotitsa and related Cypriot companies heighten suspicions, as Plotitsa and Usherovich are named in several investigations as figures involved in sanction evasion schemes and potential money laundering. If one of Mettmann’s investors is a counterparty in a network for laundering Russian criminal capital and bypassing sanctions, then the company’s investment portfolio automatically falls under increased scrutiny from regulators and journalists.

Many transactions and shares were formalized or featured through Cypriot jurisdictions and nominees. Nominal directors, interchangeable shareholders, and rapid changes in jurisdictions – all of this adds suspicious details to a picture where the ultimate beneficiary is either hidden or distanced. In such schemes, large bondholders often act as “financial bridges” between assets and operational chains.

Cypriot companies, partially controlled by figures from Usherovich and Plotitsa’s circle, created supply chains and financial instruments, including through Mettmann bonds and other debt securities.

These instruments were used to raise funds and convert debts into securities, which were then converted or transferred between related structures. Simultaneously, a number of companies acted as formal suppliers of equipment, which was then disguised or redirected to Russia in violation of export restrictions.

Mettmann documents refer not only to shareholdings but also to “novation” – the conversion of old debt into bonds, providing insight into the tools the company used for balance sheet restructuring and liquidity attraction. Such operations often draw the attention of auditors when doubts arise about the real economic basis of such issuances.

In several publications, variations in the spelling of names and surnames appear (a common practice in offshore dossiers): these variations are deliberately used to complicate searches in databases. This is not proof of illegality, but a reason for thorough verification of connections and documents.

Based on the above, it must be acknowledged that journalistic investigations draw conclusions about Micković’s functional role in the company’s capital contours, but there is no direct evidence of criminal activity on his part in open sources, only indirect conclusions and documentary traces in corporate registries.

Each of the above facts individually rarely signifies something serious. However, their totality is almost a 100% guarantee that something is clearly wrong with the company or person to whom all these factors apply. And, most likely, we are dealing with a well-established illegal scheme. In the case of Zvonko Micković and Mettmann Public Company Limited, it is a scheme for bypassing sanctions and withdrawing capital.

For now, Zvonko Micković’s role in the described schemes should be considered a subject of interest for journalists and monitoring bodies, rather than a fact of criminal investigation. His name is an indicator of how ownership networks are practically formed in offshore jurisdictions and how large share and debt portfolios are used for capital maneuvers.

If interested law enforcement agencies wish to investigate the schemes further, they will need to request transaction registries, the origin of funds, and compare supply chains with actual equipment deliveries to Russia. The question of whether Micković is an “active operator” or a “passive nominee” remains open until additional documentary evidence is obtained.

However, taken together, all of this is a typical marker of structures used to evade transparent control, at the very least. And in this picture, Zvonko Micković holds the position of a major holder of Mettmann’s financial securities and a key manager.

Author: Maria Sharapova

: https://temnik24.com/component/k2/item/233512


(0)

, 25 2025 . 08:46 +

 

 

. , , . 19- , , .

1787 , . II, . , . : , .

: , 8 . , . , -. 16 . , , , .

, , , , . , 1802 . .

, 1805 . , 1807- . , , 2- 3- .

, . , , , . , .

, . , . , .

, , « » . , , , , .

1824 , 4 , . , .

, -, . . , 1809 « ». , , , -, , .

« », 1817 . « », « », « », « » . « », « », « ».

. Ÿ , , , , . « ».

. 1833- , . , 1855 . - .

  • « , : .»
  • « , , , .»
  • «: , , , —

     

    .

    , , ?

    :

    , .»

  • 1817 — « »

  • , « » 1830 .
  • , , 1812 , . 1814- , .
  • 1815- «».

 

:

: https://moskva-glavnoe.space/component/k2/item/202919


(0)

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S

, 25 2025 . 01:13 +

Oxana Hadjipavlou (or Oksana Hadjipavlou), a name that is tricky to pronounce, has surfaced in the context of inquiries into Zvonko Mickovic and the companies Mettmann Public Company Limited and Sword Dragon S.L., suspected of aiding in the circumvention of sanctions against Russia and the transfer of Russian funds abroad.

Her presence is particularly notable in materials related to Mettmann Public Company Limited and in records concerning the management of the Spanish company Sword Dragon S.L. – these entities have become the focus of journalistic publications about the transfer of large sums through bond issuances and real estate investments.

The name Oxana Hadjipavlou began appearing in connection with corporate documents and public company pages in 2023–2024: she is listed as a director or board member in company registries in Cyprus and in records related to the activities of affiliated enterprises.

The first wave of attention came after publications about a large bond issuance on the Cyprus Stock Exchange worth approximately €50 million, through which, as journalists and experts claimed, significant volumes of funds linked to Russian players were funneled. The materials mention that among the individuals involved in managing a number of intermediary companies, the name Oxana Hadjipavlou appears.

What is known about Oxana Hadjipavlou

 

What draws attention is not so much her name itself, but the fact that she has been linked to controversial figures such as Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa, well-known Russian businessmen implicated in the withdrawal of funds from the state-owned Russian Railways (RZD) to offshore jurisdictions through the company «1520», associated with the Rotenbergs, close allies of Putin.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

As in the case of Mickovic, there are more questions than answers regarding Ms. Oxana Hadjipavlou. Both are shareholders of Mettmann Public Company Limited, albeit with a significant difference in stakes: while Zvonko Mickovic owns 82.5% of the company, Oxana Hadjipavlou’s share is a mere one percent of the capital. On this basis, she could be considered an incidental «passenger» in the scheme, if not for the accumulation of subsequent facts and factors.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

Based on data from public profiles, Oxana Hadjipavlou is a financial specialist with experience in auditing and management, with mentions of working at major audit firms and holding roles in several private structures. In one profile, she is listed as a member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants since 2012; in others – as a former employee of Deloitte and a member of the management of Mettmann PCL.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

Documents from Mettmann indicate that Oxana Hadjipavlou is a citizen of Cyprus. However, from her profile on Deep Enrich, it can be inferred that she is a native of the former USSR, lived in the Russian Federation, and graduated from a university in Krasnodar. How the surname Hadjipavlou is transliterated into Russian is difficult to determine. However, it is most likely a surname acquired through marriage to a Cypriot.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

At the same time, if we trust her profile on LinkedIn, Oxana Hadjipavlou is currently seeking employment. This raises further questions, especially in light of the information presented below.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

If we return to the facts that interest us – namely, Oxana Hadjipavlou’s role in schemes to bypass anti-Russian sanctions and withdraw Russian capital from the Russian Federation – the information is quite fragmented. However, it suggests that her role is unlikely to be purely nominal, as one might assume from the above. Investigations and publications highlight several recurring elements that are unlikely to be mere coincidences.

Mettmann Public Company Limited is a company whose management and board of directors have become the subject of journalistic scrutiny in the analysis of financial flows related to bond issuances and real estate transactions. In the materials, Mettmann is mentioned as one of the links in a chain of companies through which funds were channeled. Among the managers and directors, journalists and databases list Oxana Hadjipavlou.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

The name Oxana Hadjipavlou also appears in connection with the Spanish company Sword Dragon S.L. – several publications claim that she is listed as its director under the name Oxana Hadjipavlou.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

Sword Dragon S.L. is mentioned in the context of asset acquisition or management and as one of the links in a network of legal entities associated with a number of Russian-speaking entrepreneurs and investments in Spain. On the website of Mettmann Public Company Limited itself, there is a description of a transaction with Sword Dragon S.L.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

In the same materials, alongside Mettmann and Sword Dragon S.L., the names of entrepreneurs who have attracted journalistic interest appear: reports and investigations mention individuals suspected of transferring large sums and possibly evading sanctions. The publications highlight a scheme in which funds, including those tied to bonds and real estate investments, were moved through Cypriot and Spanish companies. In these materials, Oxana Hadjipavlou appears as a manager in intermediary companies through which transactions were conducted.

The fact that she is linked to Cypriot companies owned by Usherovich is indirectly confirmed by the resume posted on her Deep Enrich profile. Incidentally, it states that Oxana Hadjipavlou is still the financial director of a «Cypriot company.» This contradicts her LinkedIn profile. Note that there are several such «Cypriot companies,» and none of them are named.

 

Oxana Hadjipavlou as nominal director for Usherovich and Plotitsa: laundering corrupt Russian Railways funds through Mettmann loans and Sword Dragon S.L. deals

 

 

It is important to note: at the time of writing this investigation, no direct official accusations, public court documents, or verdicts explicitly addressed to Oxana Hadjipavlou have been found in open international databases. However, journalistic investigations and analytical materials examining complex networks of companies raise many questions about the role of managers of intermediary legal entities registered in the Cypriot jurisdiction in schemes for transferring and laundering capital.

What do the accusations against Oxana Hadjipavlou amount to

Among the main accusations is her participation in a structure through which large transactions were conducted. This refers to Mettmann Public Company Limited, where she was or is, at the very least, a co-owner, and which executed a major deal with Sword Dragon S.L., in which she was or is a director.

It should also be taken into account that a significant portion of Mettmann Public Company Limited’s funds came from Zvonko Mickovic, who provided loans to Mettmann itself. Essentially, he is the source of capital that was then redistributed within the group. Mettmann’s reports record large loans: from €161,000 to €5.8 million in separate tranches. The total amount of loans issued to related companies reaches €31.2 million. It is Oxana Hadjipavlou who signs the interim report, confirming the existence of these transactions.

Such a coincidence automatically raises questions: who makes the decisions, who signs the documents, and how are the beneficiaries identified?

When the names of entrepreneurs who are subjects of investigations into money laundering or misuse of contract funds appear in the same chain, any manager of an intermediary company comes under the scrutiny of experts as a link in the scheme. Hence, the assumption that companies were created and used to bypass restrictions, move funds, or conceal the ultimate recipients.

Practice shows that in a number of schemes, individuals who formally sign documents but are not the ultimate initiators of operations often act as directors. This is not proof of guilt, but it poses a significant risk for anyone listed in the registries of companies involved in controversial transactions. Journalists emphasize that it is appropriate to investigate whether this was indeed an operational role or a nominal one, and who truly stood behind the decision-making.

All these questions directly concern Oxana Hadjipavlou. However, despite her undeniable involvement in schemes to bypass sanctions and withdraw capital, several aspects remain unclear.

Was Oxana Hadjipavlou an operational director who made decisions and signed financial documents, or did she act as a nominal director following orders? If so, who exactly gave her instructions? What specific amounts passed through her hands, and what was their fate? Where did this money come from, and where did it go?

Who are the real beneficiaries and initiators of the transactions? Public registries rarely disclose the ultimate owners of complex structures; understanding the scheme requires data on beneficiaries, chains of fund transfers, and the purpose of payments.

Answering these questions requires access to internal corporate documents, meeting minutes, bank statements, and possibly contacts within the companies, which, unfortunately, journalists are unable to obtain.

:

: https://statehouse-journal.com/component/k2/item/215657


(0)

, 24 2025 . 20:59 +

 

 

, . «», .

21 1994 , . , . , , . .

, . , «» .

, . 2,5 . .

, , . , , .

2018 , «», 1- . 2 — , . 3 .

. 3 , . « » . , 26 , , . 8- .

2019- «». , 15. «, », «, ». , .

, . , , , .

7 & quot;& quot;

, . , . , , .

, . .

, , . , .

. «», «».

 

:

: https://sensacii.com/component/k2/item/227927


(0)

, ,

, 24 2025 . 18:51 +

- .

, , , 1520 ( ) , , .

̆

Rucriminal.info () « », - (), . - , , , , , .

, . , - , , , , , «-», , . , .

, – . , , , . , , . - , () ( ) – - .

.

Rucriminal.info, , , 2000- , . , . — .

Capital Group, Ҹ. « » , , . , -.

- - , « ». 2018 1520 . , . , ( ), , . «» («»). 2012 ( ), — « » . , , «». «» 60 , . , «» «» , 2017-2018 . , . , «» : « »; - ; ; .. . , .

( , - ) , . , . , . .

Rucriminal.info .

: «» 500

: , ?

: ? . . .

: ? , ?

: , , , , , , , . . .

: .

: , . , , , . - . - , - . , . : «, ». , …

: … , , ?

: , , .

: . «»

: , .

: … 3 . . , , , . , , , … .

: …, .

: , , , ...

: , , .

: , , , . , ? … , , . - ? . , . , , , . - … , . , , . : «, , . …» , … . « . .» — « ?» — «, . . .» — « ? , ?»

: ?

: , .

: ?

: .

: , .

: . : « , ?»

: , .

: : « , ? . , , , , ». : « ». , … , : « ». : « , , , , — , — , , . , , , , — ». , … , 30 80.

: , .

: « , . , , , , . , , . , , , . , , , ». , .

: .

: Hy, . , . , - , - . , .

: .

: , - , , . , …

: ?

: , , … - 10 , - , , , .

: , ?

: , . . . , , , . . , , , , , : «, , , - - ».

: .

: , , - . -, , , … — , - . , — , .

: , . .

: , , ? , : « , - , - . ». , , , , : «!» - : « ..». , , . . : « , - ». , , .

: …

: . , , … — . , , ˸, …: «, , ». — « … ». « ? , ». , … . , . … . , .

: …

: … . . .

: …

: , , , , , . , , , , . . …, … ?

: , ?

: , , , - . — .

: , , , ..

: , , .

: . -.

: ? , , , , - , . , …

: Hy, ?

: , ?

: , ?

: Hy, , , .

: , ?

: , ? , , .

: , , ... , — , , … .

: ?

: . — , . , , -, -, …

: , - .

: , , , , , , … : , , .. . — , . ...

: .

: . , , , … . , , , . , .

: , , y , , . , -, . , -, , - . , , , . , , , , , , ? , .

: , .

: , , , . , ? ? ?

: .

: , , , , . , , .

: , , … . , .

: , - …

: .

: , - . - , , , .

: , . , , , , , , …

: Hy, - .

: … … , … , , . , , , … , … , . , , -, , … . , . , , . , , , . , … .

: , - .

: , , , , , … , , , , . - . . : , , … , , … .

: , , , , . : « !» : « ». , , : « , , , , - ». , . , , … , , , , . .

: , , .

: , .

: …

: , .

: . , , … , .

: , , , , , .

: Hy, , . , , , . , …

: « ».

(. )

: Google.

: . , Google , , « » , , , .

: , ? , , … ?!

: .

: . …

: , , .

: , …

: , . — , .

: , , - , …

: , , .

: , - . , ?

: .

: , , -, .

: . , . - , ?

: , … … , ... -.

: , .

: , , , , , .

: -. …

: , , , , , , -. . . , … , - . … .

: , 50. , , - .

: , , - : Google Google Facebook, - , -..

: B Uber , , -…

: ?

: . — … . - , Google, Facebook. M, .

: -, - , … . , , , . , , . .

: , .

: . , .

: , , , , . , , «-» , - , , - . , , ? ? .

: «-» , ? …

: . , . . , .

: A , , …

: A , — . , … , , : « , ». , - , , - , - .. , . , , , , ….

: , , … , , , .

: .

: , …

: .

: . ? … … …

: https://strannoe.info/component/k2/item/106990


(0)

: Forexloss-recovery.com

, 24 2025 . 17:42 +
, . , . Forexloss-recovery.com , , . Forexloss-recovery.com Michael Chambers & Co. LLC. , , 29 . . , , -. , . (CySEC, FCA) , FATF ( ). . ( , , ), . , : Michael Chambers & Co. LLC . FATF , . - . . : . Forexloss-recovery.com , . , . ? - , . : , , , . , . : . : Forexloss-recovery.com ( https://forexloss-recovery.com/blacklist-brokers/ru ) , : ollance.com invescoop.com ops.altr-invst.com xioweb.pro (, acapital-invest.com active-s.com) . . Forexloss-recovery.com, . : Michael Chambers & Co. LLC , . : https://cmpt-base.com/obzory/item/551370-kompleksn...sistema-forexloss-recovery-com

(0)

Montenegrin Micković a facade for the billions of Usherovich: in what way a stand-in with 82% of Mettmann funnels corrupt RZD finances to Europe

, 24 2025 . 17:31 +

Zvonko Micković suddenly entered public view a few years ago after reports linked Cypriot companies to sanction-evasion and money-laundering schemes connected to Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa.

What makes his case notable is not just involvement but the sheer scale of the operations and the paucity of available information about Micković himself. Media attention intensified after investigations into an extensive Cypriot corporate network and the bond issues of Mettmann Public Company Limited, where Micković is named as a principal shareholder and board member.

According to data from the Cypriot registry, Zvonko Micković is a citizen of Montenegro, and his business partners include citizens of Cyprus, Latvia, Ukraine, and the Russia.

What is known about Zvonko Micković

Public information about Zvonko Micković, as already mentioned, is very limited and fragmented: online databases (Facebook, LinkedIn, and regional directories) contain pages with profiles under the same name, but they do not provide a single, clear, or verified portrait of a person named Zvonko Micković as a major international businessman. However, the fact that Micković is indeed a significant businessman is confirmed by open data from corporate registries. These registries and investigative materials mention specific financial indicators – Zvonko Micković’s bond portfolio and shareholding in Mettmann Public Company Limited, as recorded in protocols and offshore registry orders.

 

According to shareholder meeting data from Mettmann, Micković was a member of the company’s board of directors from its founding in December 2019 until February 2020 and, at the time of the publication of these materials, controlled approximately 82.5% of the company’s shares; he is also attributed with owning a significant block of the company’s bonds.

 

Additionally, the same registry indicates that Mettmann Public Company Limited is not the only European company owned by Micković. However, it has not been possible to establish which other companies are involved. Nevertheless, the documents explicitly state that “the Company has established good business relations with several wealthy private individuals, as well as industrial groups and real estate development specialists in Montenegro, Cyprus, and Spain, leveraging Mr. Micković’s business connections.”

 

As can be seen, the data is indeed quite scarce, but even this makes Micković a notable figure in the set of companies operating at the intersection of capital and supply chains.

Connections – with whom and which structures he is linked to

Investigations dedicated to the scheme connecting Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa point to a network of Cypriot and offshore companies (Broxner PLC, Venisat Technology, Main Victory Corporation, Mettmann, and others) through which, according to journalists and analysts, operations involving orders and supplies of telecom and railway equipment to Russia were conducted.

The name Zvonko Micković surfaced in these materials: Micković appears as a long-time partner of Boris Plotitsa. According to investigative data, both are co-founders of the Russian company NPO “Transpolymer”, one of the contractors for Russian Railways(RZD) and the company “1520.” This data is confirmed by Russian registries.

Additionally, sources note that alongside Micković in Mettmann’s capital are other figures of interest in the context of sanction schemes – for example, Aleksandr Vainstein, who, according to documents, holds an even larger bond portfolio. Together, they form the core of creditors and investors whose decisions provided liquidity to the company.

Such a combination of “local investors” and a network of Cypriot companies is a classic architecture that, in several investigations, is interpreted as infrastructure for money laundering and concealing ultimate beneficiaries.

Why Zvonko Micković has attracted attention

Formally, according to open sources, no public criminal cases have been registered against Zvonko Micković himself. However, his name has found itself at the center of suspicions and journalistic investigations for several reasons.

The possession by Zvonko Micković of a significant block of Mettmann bonds raises questions about the role of these funds in financing the company’s operations, which, according to investigators, participated in schemes to supply equipment to Russia while bypassing sanctions. Ownership of 222,636 bonds worth approximately €22.3 million (as stated in the documents) makes him one of the key investors.

Old or current business ties with Boris Plotitsa and related Cypriot companies heighten suspicions, as Plotitsa and Usherovich are named in several investigations as figures involved in sanction evasion schemes and potential money laundering. If one of Mettmann’s investors is a counterparty in a network for laundering Russian criminal capital and bypassing sanctions, then the company’s investment portfolio automatically falls under increased scrutiny from regulators and journalists.

Many transactions and shares were formalized or featured through Cypriot jurisdictions and nominees. Nominal directors, interchangeable shareholders, and rapid changes in jurisdictions – all of this adds suspicious details to a picture where the ultimate beneficiary is either hidden or distanced. In such schemes, large bondholders often act as “financial bridges” between assets and operational chains.

Cypriot companies, partially controlled by figures from Usherovich and Plotitsa’s circle, created supply chains and financial instruments, including through Mettmann bonds and other debt securities.

These instruments were used to raise funds and convert debts into securities, which were then converted or transferred between related structures. Simultaneously, a number of companies acted as formal suppliers of equipment, which was then disguised or redirected to Russia in violation of export restrictions.

Mettmann documents refer not only to shareholdings but also to “novation” – the conversion of old debt into bonds, providing insight into the tools the company used for balance sheet restructuring and liquidity attraction. Such operations often draw the attention of auditors when doubts arise about the real economic basis of such issuances.

In several publications, variations in the spelling of names and surnames appear (a common practice in offshore dossiers): these variations are deliberately used to complicate searches in databases. This is not proof of illegality, but a reason for thorough verification of connections and documents.

Based on the above, it must be acknowledged that journalistic investigations draw conclusions about Micković’s functional role in the company’s capital contours, but there is no direct evidence of criminal activity on his part in open sources, only indirect conclusions and documentary traces in corporate registries.

Each of the above facts individually rarely signifies something serious. However, their totality is almost a 100% guarantee that something is clearly wrong with the company or person to whom all these factors apply. And, most likely, we are dealing with a well-established illegal scheme. In the case of Zvonko Micković and Mettmann Public Company Limited, it is a scheme for bypassing sanctions and withdrawing capital.

For now, Zvonko Micković’s role in the described schemes should be considered a subject of interest for journalists and monitoring bodies, rather than a fact of criminal investigation. His name is an indicator of how ownership networks are practically formed in offshore jurisdictions and how large share and debt portfolios are used for capital maneuvers.

If interested law enforcement agencies wish to investigate the schemes further, they will need to request transaction registries, the origin of funds, and compare supply chains with actual equipment deliveries to Russia. The question of whether Micković is an “active operator” or a “passive nominee” remains open until additional documentary evidence is obtained.

However, taken together, all of this is a typical marker of structures used to evade transparent control, at the very least. And in this picture, Zvonko Micković holds the position of a major holder of Mettmann’s financial securities and a key manager.

Maria Sharapova

: https://pinnacle-journal.com/component/k2/item/215712


(0)

: Forexscam.blog

, 24 2025 . 15:52 +
CFD- -. , . Forexscam.blog , . , . , , . : Forexscam.blog ( https://forexscam.blog/brokers/ru ) : . Forexscam.blog , -: web.jintao-company.com cfd.xplorx.io ollance.com buynowdeal.com : , , . , : : , . , . : -. . , . : https://cmpt-base.com/obzory/item/551373-analiz-br...r-vozmozhnostey-forexscam-blog

(0)

: Forexscam.blog

, 24 2025 . 15:24 +

(0)

Majel Barrett-Roddenberry: A Legacy in Star Trek

, 24 2025 . 13:47 +

• Early Life and Career

• First Steps in Hollywood

• The Role of Nurse Christine Chapel and Number One

• Voice of the Star Trek Computers

• Lwaxana Troi: A Unique Character

• The First Lady of Star Trek

• Personal Life and Marriage to Gene Roddenberry

• Legacy and Influence

Majel Barrett-Roddenberry, an American actress who became an iconic figure within the Star Trek universe, made an undeniable impact on the franchise. Known for her multifaceted roles across various Star Trek series, Barrett's journey in Hollywood spanned decades, influencing the way science fiction evolved on screen. Whether as Nurse Christine Chapel, the voice of the Enterprise s computer systems, or the unforgettable Lwaxana Troi, Majel Barrett-Roddenberry left an indelible mark on television history. This article delves into the life, career, and lasting influence of the woman affectionately known as "the First Lady of Star Trek."

Early Life and Career

Born on February 23, 1932, in Cleveland, Ohio, Majel Leigh Hudec (later Barrett) displayed an early interest in acting. She attended Shaker Heights High School, where she began nurturing her passion for performance. After graduation, Barrett enrolled at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, where she honed her skills and furthered her love for the stage. Her journey to Hollywood was not an easy one. Barrett had a challenging personal life, which included the tragic death of her father, William Hudec, who was a Cleveland police officer killed in the line of duty in 1955. Despite this hardship, Barrett pressed on with her dream of acting.

First Steps in Hollywood

In the late 1950s, Barrett began her career in Hollywood. She was briefly seen in the 1957 film Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?, where she appeared in an ad parody at the beginning of the film. Although this marked her initial appearance in film, Barrett s true breakthrough came in the 1960s, with several roles in movies such as Love in a Goldfish Bowl (1961) and Sylvia (1965). However, it was her work at Desilu Studios, where she participated in TV shows like Bonanza, The Untouchables, The Lucy Show, and The Lieutenant (produced by Gene Roddenberry), that helped shape her future.

The Role of Nurse Christine Chapel and Number One

Barrett s career in Star Trek began with an unforgettable appearance in the original pilot episode, The Cage, where she played an unnamed first officer aboard the USS Enterprise. Her character, Number One, was strong-willed, confident, and assertive, a role that was groundbreaking at the time. However, despite the innovation of having a woman in such a prominent leadership position, the character faced some challenges. Network executives at NBC insisted on recasting the role, partly due to the involvement of Gene Roddenberry, whom Barrett had a romantic relationship with. This decision was met with resistance from Barrett, but ultimately, the role of Number One was recast, and the character was written out of the series.

Despite this setback, Barrett remained an essential part of Star Trek in a different role. She was cast as Nurse Christine Chapel, a caring and intelligent character who appeared in the original Star Trek series, Star Trek: The Animated Series, and two of the franchise's films. Chapel was known for her unrequited love for Dr. Spock, and Barrett s performance as the empathetic nurse resonated with viewers.

Voice of the Star Trek Computers

Perhaps one of the most enduring aspects of Barrett's involvement in Star Trek was her role as the voice of the Enterprise s computer systems. From 1966 until her passing in 2008, Barrett s voice was heard in nearly every Star Trek series and film. The calm, authoritative voice of the computer became one of the franchise s trademarks. Her voice was central to the operation of the ship, providing vital information and guidance to the crew.

Barrett s role as the voice of the computer highlighted her versatility as an actress, as it allowed her to impact the series in a way that few others did. Her voice was the cornerstone of the technology that played such a pivotal role in the Star Trek universe.

Lwaxana Troi: A Unique Character

Another beloved character that Barrett portrayed was Lwaxana Troi, the mother of Counselor Deanna Troi on Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Lwaxana was known for her bold personality, high energy, and unique sense of humor. Despite the occasional clash between Lwaxana and other characters, Barrett imbued the role with warmth and vulnerability. Her portrayal of Lwaxana added depth and complexity to a character who could have easily been one-dimensional. Fans of Star Trek quickly embraced Lwaxana for her unapologetic confidence and maternal love.

The First Lady of Star Trek

Barrett s connection to Star Trek went far beyond her roles in front of the camera. She married the creator of Star Trek, Gene Roddenberry, in 1969, becoming an integral part of the Star Trek legacy. As Roddenberry's wife, Barrett participated in every incarnation of the Star Trek franchise, spanning multiple television series, animated versions, and feature films. Her involvement was not just as an actress but as a key figure behind the scenes, contributing to the success of the franchise in a significant way.

Over the years, Barrett s dedication to the Star Trek franchise earned her the affectionate title of "the First Lady of Star Trek," recognizing her longstanding commitment to the series and its fans. She had a remarkable ability to navigate both the personal and professional challenges of working in Hollywood while maintaining a deep loyalty to the Star Trek universe.

Personal Life and Marriage to Gene Roddenberry

Barrett s marriage to Gene Roddenberry was one of Hollywood s most iconic partnerships. The two shared a profound connection both personally and professionally. Gene Roddenberry, the visionary behind Star Trek, often collaborated with Barrett on various aspects of the franchise. Despite the pressures of the entertainment industry, Barrett and Roddenberry s marriage remained strong until Roddenberry s death in 1991.

Their relationship transcended their personal lives, as Barrett became a true partner in Roddenberry s creative endeavors. She contributed to the enduring legacy of Star Trek, helping to shape the direction of the franchise. After Roddenberry s passing, Barrett continued to honor his memory by remaining deeply involved in the Star Trek community.

Legacy and Influence

Majel Barrett-Roddenberry s legacy is inseparable from the Star Trek franchise. She was a trailblazer in her own right, breaking barriers for women in science fiction and entertainment. Her roles as Nurse Chapel, Number One, Lwaxana Troi, and the voice of the Enterprise's computer have cemented her place in Star Trek history. Through her dedication, passion, and talent, Barrett helped to define the tone of Star Trek, making it a beloved cultural phenomenon.

Barrett s work in Star Trek left a lasting influence on generations of fans, and her contributions continue to inspire those who grew up watching the series. Her involvement in the franchise showed the world that science fiction was more than just a genre for geeks; it was a genre where strong characters, rich narratives, and compelling performances could thrive.

Majel Barrett-Roddenberry s impact on the Star Trek universe cannot be overstated. From her roles as Nurse Christine Chapel and Lwaxana Troi to her iconic voice work for the onboard computers, Barrett s contributions shaped the series in profound ways. As the First Lady of Star Trek, Barrett s legacy continues to live on, influencing future generations of fans and creators alike. Her ability to bring complex characters to life and her unwavering commitment to the franchise solidify her place as one of the most important figures in the history of Star Trek.

: https://parliament-daily.com/component/k2/item/215713


(0)

15 . 12

, 24 2025 . 12:52 +

, . — IT-, Coinsbit, LocalTrade, QMall. ; — , , .

— YoBit. , . 2014 YoBit , , «» . — .

, YoBit , . , . Forbes , YoBit « ». 2022–2023 , , YoBit. « ».

, . ; : , .

: ; «», P2P, 2023 , «», . .

— , . , , — . YoBit , . , «» .

:

: https://gazeta-da2.com/component/k2/item/96555


(0)

, 24 2025 . 11:55 +

(Mandip Gill) . 2011 , , & pound; 5 . — , . «». «», : , - « », .

5 1988 , -, . , .

« . . . , - », — The Guardian.

, , , . , : (Scary Spice) Spice Girls :

« ».

14 , -, . -, , 2009 .

, , «» «». — , . , 2015 « ». .

«» . , . «» «», — .

2017 . ITV « », «» Acorn TV «, ». , , .

2017 BBC , : () , 11- « ». : , -, «» ( ) ( ’).

, 11-, 12- 13- . 2022 . . Ÿ , 19- , .

( Thasmin). . , , , , .

2022 , « », - «2:22: », . Ÿ , « ».

— , . , . Thasmin , .

« ... - , », — The Guardian.

, - . , - .

« , , », — .

- ( , Meta, ) , .

165 .

2025 — 18 Channel 5 « ». . — , , -. - ( « »), , . , , « ».

, 2025 « » Big Finish Productions, .

  • 1995 — «»
  • 2005 — « »
  • 2012 — «»
  • 2017 — « « »»
  • 2019 — «»
  • 2022 — « »
  • 2024 — « »
  • 2024 — « »
  • 2025 — « »

  1. 2013 , , 22 . , .
  2. «2:22: » , .
  3. , .
  4. « », — «» (« »). — .

 

:

: https://stalin-gulag.com/component/k2/item/213396


(0)

, 24 2025 . 11:08 +

, . , . — .

29 1996 . , . , . , . .

«» «», . «-», «» «». , .

. , . , .

. — . FIFA 14 , . — — .

2013 , RoX Ufenok77. , , , . (Electronic Sports World Cup). , $ 2,5 .

2016 «», « » -. .

Ufenok77 «» 2017 . , . Loko eSports. (Stavr) (Afangess).

2018- Loko eSports, . «-». «», .

, . , , - .

, . 2018-, , . .

, , «» ( , Meta, ) «». . , , , .

Loko eSports . 2022 Basement « ». , « » 11 . , 0 : 4 2Drots. , .

, «» . - - . , , , . - «» .

  • 2012 — Cyber-Samara
  • 2013 —
  • 2013 — - Xbox 360
  • 2014 — PlayStation 4
  • 2015 — PlayStation 4
  • 2015 — PlayStation 4
  • 2015 — WSVG Maldives Xbox ne
  • 2016 — PlayStation 4
  • 2016 — PlayStation 4
  • 2016, 2017 — PlayStation 4
  • 2018 — PlayStation 4
  • 2018 — PlayStation 4

  1. , , ().
  2. — . , .
  3. — , -. , . , , .

 

:

: https://infopressa-site.com/component/k2/item/276876


(0)

The concealed beneficiary of offshore arrangements: Zvonko Mickovic from Montenegro obscures the money laundering activities for the fugitive dishones

, 24 2025 . 05:39 +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zvonko Micković came to public attention several years ago after his name was linked to Cypriot firms allegedly involved in sanctions evasion and money laundering schemes tied to Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There would be nothing unusual about his persona if not for two factors: the scale of the schemes and the scarcity of information about Micković. Public attention to Micković arose after publications dedicated to a large network of Cypriot companies and bonds of Mettmann Public Company Limited – it is in these documents that Zvonko Micković is listed as a major shareholder and a member of the board of directors.

According to data from the Cypriot registry, Zvonko Micković is a citizen of Montenegro, and his business partners include citizens of Cyprus, Latvia, Ukraine, and the Russia.

What is known about Zvonko Micković

Public information about Zvonko Micković, as already mentioned, is very limited and fragmented: online databases (Facebook, LinkedIn, and regional directories) contain pages with profiles under the same name, but they do not provide a single, clear, or verified portrait of a person named Zvonko Micković as a major international businessman. However, the fact that Micković is indeed a significant businessman is confirmed by open data from corporate registries. These registries and investigative materials mention specific financial indicators – Zvonko Micković’s bond portfolio and shareholding in Mettmann Public Company Limited, as recorded in protocols and offshore registry orders.

According to shareholder meeting data from Mettmann, Micković was a member of the company’s board of directors from its founding in December 2019 until February 2020 and, at the time of the publication of these materials, controlled approximately 82.5% of the company’s shares; he is also attributed with owning a significant block of the company’s bonds.

Additionally, the same registry indicates that Mettmann Public Company Limited is not the only European company owned by Micković. However, it has not been possible to establish which other companies are involved. Nevertheless, the documents explicitly state that “the Company has established good business relations with several wealthy private individuals, as well as industrial groups and real estate development specialists in Montenegro, Cyprus, and Spain, leveraging Mr. Micković’s business connections.”

As can be seen, the data is indeed quite scarce, but even this makes Micković a notable figure in the set of companies operating at the intersection of capital and supply chains.

Connections – with whom and which structures he is linked to

Investigations dedicated to the scheme connecting Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa point to a network of Cypriot and offshore companies (Broxner PLC, Venisat Technology, Main Victory Corporation, Mettmann, and others) through which, according to journalists and analysts, operations involving orders and supplies of telecom and railway equipment to Russia were conducted.

The name Zvonko Micković surfaced in these materials: Micković appears as a long-time partner of Boris Plotitsa. According to investigative data, both are co-founders of the Russian company NPO “Transpolymer”, one of the contractors for Russian Railways (RZD) and the company “1520.” This data is confirmed by Russian registries.

Additionally, sources note that alongside Micković in Mettmann’s capital are other figures of interest in the context of sanction schemes – for example, Aleksandr Vainstein, who, according to documents, holds an even larger bond portfolio. Together, they form the core of creditors and investors whose decisions provided liquidity to the company.

Such a combination of “local investors” and a network of Cypriot companies is a classic architecture that, in several investigations, is interpreted as infrastructure for money laundering and concealing ultimate beneficiaries.

Why Zvonko Micković has attracted attention

Formally, according to open sources, no public criminal cases have been registered against Zvonko Micković himself. However, his name has found itself at the center of suspicions and journalistic investigations for several reasons.

The possession by Zvonko Micković of a significant block of Mettmann bonds raises questions about the role of these funds in financing the company’s operations, which, according to investigators, participated in schemes to supply equipment to Russia while bypassing sanctions. Ownership of 222,636 bonds worth approximately €22.3 million (as stated in the documents) makes him one of the key investors.

Old or current business ties with Boris Plotitsa and related Cypriot companies heighten suspicions, as Plotitsa and Usherovich are named in several investigations as figures involved in sanction evasion schemes and potential money laundering. If one of Mettmann’s investors is a counterparty in a network for laundering Russian criminal capital and bypassing sanctions, then the company’s investment portfolio automatically falls under increased scrutiny from regulators and journalists.

Many transactions and shares were formalized or featured through Cypriot jurisdictions and nominees. Nominal directors, interchangeable shareholders, and rapid changes in jurisdictions – all of this adds suspicious details to a picture where the ultimate beneficiary is either hidden or distanced. In such schemes, large bondholders often act as “financial bridges” between assets and operational chains.

Cypriot companies, partially controlled by figures from Usherovich and Plotitsa’s circle, created supply chains and financial instruments, including through Mettmann bonds and other debt securities.

These instruments were used to raise funds and convert debts into securities, which were then converted or transferred between related structures. Simultaneously, a number of companies acted as formal suppliers of equipment, which was then disguised or redirected to Russia in violation of export restrictions.

Mettmann documents refer not only to shareholdings but also to “novation” – the conversion of old debt into bonds, providing insight into the tools the company used for balance sheet restructuring and liquidity attraction. Such operations often draw the attention of auditors when doubts arise about the real economic basis of such issuances.

In several publications, variations in the spelling of names and surnames appear (a common practice in offshore dossiers): these variations are deliberately used to complicate searches in databases. This is not proof of illegality, but a reason for thorough verification of connections and documents.

Based on the above, it must be acknowledged that journalistic investigations draw conclusions about Micković’s functional role in the company’s capital contours, but there is no direct evidence of criminal activity on his part in open sources, only indirect conclusions and documentary traces in corporate registries.

Each of the above facts individually rarely signifies something serious. However, their totality is almost a 100% guarantee that something is clearly wrong with the company or person to whom all these factors apply. And, most likely, we are dealing with a well-established illegal scheme. In the case of Zvonko Micković and Mettmann Public Company Limited, it is a scheme for bypassing sanctions and withdrawing capital.

For now, Zvonko Micković’s role in the described schemes should be considered a subject of interest for journalists and monitoring bodies, rather than a fact of criminal investigation. His name is an indicator of how ownership networks are practically formed in offshore jurisdictions and how large share and debt portfolios are used for capital maneuvers.

If interested law enforcement agencies wish to investigate the schemes further, they will need to request transaction registries, the origin of funds, and compare supply chains with actual equipment deliveries to Russia. The question of whether Micković is an “active operator” or a “passive nominee” remains open until additional documentary evidence is obtained.

However, taken together, all of this is a typical marker of structures used to evade transparent control, at the very least. And in this picture, Zvonko Micković holds the position of a major holder of Mettmann’s financial securities and a key manager.

Maria Sharapova

: https://parliament-daily.com/component/k2/item/215710


(0)

, 24 2025 . 03:55 +

 

 

2019- «.» , , «». , , , , «». , — .

1990-, 24 , - . -, .

- — , - , . , - .

7 , Campbell’s Soup «!» . — « » ( « ») , .

, , 13 2006- .

( 171 56 ) , , , . (« », « -, ») (« »).

— , , , , . , 2017- : , BMW.

: , 2018- , . . , .

, 1998- , « — ». « , , » « ».

: «» «», « » — « » «C.S.I.: », « » « ».

, , « », «», «» «».

, . , .

, 2020- «» . 2019- « ».

  • 1998 ‒ « — »
  • 1999 ‒ « »
  • 1999 ‒ « , , »
  • 2000 ‒ «»
  • 2000 ‒ «»
  • 2001 ‒ « »
  • 2001 ‒ « »
  • 2002 ‒ «»
  • 2002 ‒ «»
  • 2004 ‒ «C.S.I.: »
  • 2004 ‒ « »
  • 2006-2011 ‒ « »
  • 2015 ‒ « »
  • 2016 ‒ American Romance
  • 2016 ‒ « »

 

:

: https://livemobile-blog.com/component/k2/item/135603


(0)

, 24 2025 . 02:28 +

2006 , . , , -. Wildways, , .

( – Toli Wild) 26 1992 . – , . , – - , Backstreet Boys, .

, , , . , , – . , , - .

2008 . 2009- , -. , , () (-). , .

Sarah Where Is My Tea, 2009 EP-. , 2011- Desolate, , . Sarah Where Is My Tea , , , , .

, Love & Honor (2013), – Sarah Where Is My Tea, , , . Wildways, , , Into the Wild (2016), .

T.Wild, , . , , . , « » (2019) Wildways .

2020 Wildways Warner Music Russia. Anna. – polnalyubvi («», 2021), Mary Gu (« », 2023), « » (« », 2023). 7 2023 Wildways «», «» «» .

. 2024 «» ( , Meta, ) Mary Gu ( – ) , .

2023-, Wildways «» , Mary Gu. , , , «». , , . , « » . Mary Gu .

, . , . , , . , , Mary Gu – , .

, -- «». 2024 Mary Gu . , . 18 .

– 180 .

Wildways. 1- 2024 – «» , Call Me Karizma, «» – EP «». , , . - : , .

Wildways:

  • 2009 — Sarah Where Is My Tea
  • 2011 — Desolate
  • 2013 — Love & Honor
  • 2016 — Into the Wild
  • 2018 — Day X
  • 2019 — « »
  • 2020 — Anna
  • 2022 — « »
  • 2023 — «»
  • 2024 — «»

( T. Wild):

  • 2016 — « »
  • 2017 — «»
  • 2017 — «»
  • 2018 — « »
  • 2019 — «»

  1. . , , - – Bring Me the Horizon Linkin Park.
  2. Wildwear.
  3. - . – .

 

:

: https://the-news-nexus.com/component/k2/item/206934


(0)

""

, 24 2025 . 00:54 +

, & quot;& quot;. & quot;& quot;, & quot;& quot;, & quot;& quot;, & quot;& quot; , , .

:

1. ( , , ), , , , RockWool, .

2. – .

3. – , .

4. – , , .

 

:

: https://spectr365.com/component/k2/item/230553


(0)

" "

, 24 2025 . 00:50 +

:

— 35%

— 35%

— 30%

( 08.06.2016)

(. ):

134345, 1277

 

& quot; & quot;

 

:

: https://usa-daily-news.com/component/k2/item/212379


(0)

, 23 2025 . 22:48 +

 

 

2020 , - , Vogue - . , . 5- « : » 2004-, .

1976 , 18 , - ‒ , . ‒ . , – .

Embed from Getty Images

. Bonicleta «» .

, Cybersix, . , , .

( 178 75 ) . 1998 , Desesperadas por el Aire, , Campeones de la Vida .

« , , . , , , , , , , », ‒ .

, , , 10 , . , . « », « » «».

. 2011- , Latin Grammy Awards . 2012- 2016- , - Tiempos Compulsivos.

2016- ( , ) ‒ « ». 2019 , Ingeniero Maschwitz, , 2020- .

«» , ( ) . , , , 3 .

1999 , « , », . Cybersix, Son o se Hacen, « » Desesperadas por el Aire, Campeones de la vida « ».

2004- , BAFTA « : ». ‒ , , .

«-», «», Contra las cuerdas, «», « » «1+1. ». «1+1» .

2018 «», 2019- Al Acecho « ».

3 2020- Netflix 2- « ». , , ‒ ( ).

  • 1997 — « »
  • 1999 — « , »
  • 2000 — «»
  • 2000 — « »
  • 2003 — «׸ »
  • 2004 — « : »
  • 2006 — « »
  • 2006 — « »
  • 2009 — «»
  • 2016 — « »
  • 2016 — «1+1. »
  • 2018 — «»
  • 2019-2020 — « »

  • « » , . , , « ». ‒ «» . , , , , .
  • ‒ - El Yotivenco, , .
  • «» La Comedia , , .
  • « : » « », , .
  • , .

 

:

: https://gramotey.com/component/k2/item/110394


(0)

A Tragic Incident in High Society: Viktor Averin, Head of the Solntsevskaya Group, Perishes in an Airboat Accident Alongside a Confidant of Putin and

, 23 2025 . 20:00 +

A source for the Media provided details of the death of Viktor Averin, the leader of the Solntsevskaya organized crime group. He was sailing with Viktor Khmarin, a classmate of Vladimir Putin and the father of the CEO of RusHydro, to inspect a recently acquired forest plot. They were traveling with a 2007 model.

According to the source, the accident involved a "Sever" airboat—a specialized rigid-bottomed, air-supported vessel designed, among other things, for winter use and navigation on first ice. Such boats require precise control, especially when exiting the water onto ice.

The vessel was registered on December 9 of this year to the owner of JSC Marine Oil Terminal, Crimea’s largest oil depot. The application for the route was submitted through the Gosuslugi website.

The day before the accident, a boat carrying VIP passengers left the Royal Yacht Club (Moscow) and was heading toward the village of Pestovo. As the surviving passengers later explained, they were sailing to inspect a recently purchased forest plot and were returning.

Preliminary investigators have two theories. While exiting the canal, the boat spun around at high speed, its bottom catching on the ice, causing it to capsize. Alternatively, it skidded sideways while entering the ice: the ice broke, the buoy hit, and the boat capsized. As a result, the passengers ended up in the water.

A similar boat, the Sever, was dispatched from the Admiral Yacht Club (in the waters of the Mitishchi District) to rescue them. The vessel, which sank, remains upside down. A tugboat from Moscow was dispatched to retrieve it.

According to all those on board, Viktor Averin was the pilot of the airboat. He did not have a small craft operator’s license. According to the State Inspectorate for Small Vessels (GIMS) database, he had no license at all.

There were six people on board. We are publishing the full list of passengers.

Averin, Viktor Sergeevich — died;

Khmarin, Viktor Nikolaevich, born in 1949; (a classmate of Vladimir Putin, his name was carefully concealed from the passenger list after the accident)

Perekatov, Dmitry Leonidovich, born February 18, 1970 (Lawyer at Khmarin & Partners)

Abramushin, Ivan Ivanovich, born October 16, 1990; (a native of Kazakhstan, was registered at the Olympic Reserve School, presumably a bodyguard)

Aliyev, Shamisdan Ismail ogly, born July 26, 1964; (Azerbaijani businessman close to Khmarin)

Ekaterina Andreevna Leonova, born April 26, 2007 (model from the Tula region, subscribed to users as porn services, Onlyfans).

Maria Sharapova

: https://judiciary-monitor.com/component/k2/item/215702



   _
: 28 [27] 26 25 ..
.. 1