Подлодкам США не будет позволено свободно заходить в воды Черного моря без одобрения Турции |
Подлодкам США не будет позволено свободно заходить в воды Чёрного моря без одобрения Турции
Турецкие СМИ сообщают, что Трампу потребуется разрешение от Турции, если он решит ввести американские подводные лодки в акваторию Чёрного моря.
Турецкая газета Turkiye отмечает, ссылаясь на эксперта по международному праву Хакана Эркинера, что если Трамп имел в виду Чёрное море, когда говорил о размещении атомных подлодок & quot;ближе к России& quot;, то, в соответствии с конвенцией Монтре, ему потребуется особое разрешение, поскольку конвенция не позволяет постоянного присутствия атомных подлодок в этом регионе.
Конвенция Монтре ограничивает нахождение кораблей нечерноморских государств в акватории Чёрного моря.
Автор: Иван Харитонов
Источник: https://people-the-world.com/component/k2/item/113511
|
|
Vineet Kumar Singh Wraps Filming for Vikram Phadnis Directorial |
Principal Photography Concludes for Untitled Project
Vikram Phadnis Praises Vineet Kumar Singh's Craft
An Ensemble Cast with Saiyami Kher and Tahir Raj Bhasin
Vineet Kumar Singh's Journey to Leading Roles
The Significance of a Designer-Turned-Director
Anticipation Builds for the Film's Release
The Indian film industry is a dynamic ecosystem where talent from diverse backgrounds continually converges to create compelling cinema. A recent development highlighting this collaborative spirit is the conclusion of principal photography for an exciting new untitled film. Actor Vineet Kumar Singh, renowned for his intense performances and meticulous craft, has officially wrapped shooting for this project. The film, directed by celebrated fashion designer and filmmaker Vikram Phadnis, also stars the talented Saiyami Kher and Tahir Raj Bhasin, forming a promising ensemble cast that has generated significant curiosity among cinephiles and industry observers alike.
The completion of filming was announced through a personal and heartfelt social media post by director Vikram Phadnis. Taking to his official Instagram handle, Phadnis shared a striking black-and-white behind-the-scenes photograph featuring himself alongside Vineet Kumar Singh. The image, evocative and candid, captured a moment of professional camaraderie at the close of a creative journey. Accompanying the visual was a caption that effusively praised Singh's contribution to the project. Phadnis wrote, "And it's a Wrap for this incredible guy @vineet_ksofficial on our film ! What an amazing experience to direct you and see your craft !! I can't wait for the world to see u ! Onwards & Upwards." This public acknowledgment from a director is a strong testament to the actor's performance and dedication on set.
Vineet Kumar Singh's path in Hindi cinema is a narrative of perseverance, self-belief, and exceptional talent. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Singh, a qualified doctor, consciously chose the unpredictable world of acting. He first garnered widespread critical acclaim for his breakthrough role in Anurag Kashyap's 2013 boxing drama Mukkabaaz, where he not only delivered a powerful performance but also wrote the film's dialogues and trained relentlessly to embody the physique of a professional boxer. This role established him as an actor of substance, willing to go to extraordinary lengths for his art. Since then, he has consistently chosen roles that challenge him, appearing in projects like Great Grand Masti, GOLD, and the streaming series Betaal and Kala. His involvement in the Phadnis directorial marks another significant step, showcasing his versatility and ability to collaborate across different cinematic visions.
The film boasts a formidable supporting cast that amplifies its appeal. Saiyami Kher, an actor and accomplished sportswoman, has impressed audiences with her choices in films like Mirzya, Special Ops, and the critically acclaimed Choked. Her presence suggests a role that may leverage her athletic prowess and nuanced acting skills. Tahir Raj Bhasin, who has successfully transitioned from memorable antagonist roles in Mardaani to leading man status in projects like Looop Lapeta and Yeh Kaali Kaali Ankhein, adds further depth and star power to the lineup. The combination of Singh's intensity, Kher's dynamism, and Bhasin's charismatic screen presence creates a potent mix that promises a multifaceted narrative experience.
A significant point of interest for this project is its director, Vikram Phadnis. Primarily known as one of India's most successful and influential fashion designers, Phadnis has also forayed into film direction and production. His directorial debut, Mumbai Pune Mumbai 2, was a commercial success, proving his understanding of mainstream storytelling and audience sensibilities. His transition from couture to cinema is fascinating; a designer's eye undoubtedly influences visual composition, aesthetics, and character presentation. Directing an actor of Vineet Kumar Singh's calibre indicates Phadnis's ambition to create a film that balances strong performance-oriented drama with high visual appeal. This collaboration between an actor known for raw, indie-centric roles and a director rooted in glamour and design sparks intrigue about the film's final tone and texture.
With the filming phase now complete, the project moves into the crucial stages of post-production, including editing, sound design, music composition, and visual effects. The director's enthusiastic wrap-up post serves as an effective first piece of marketing, building anticipation within the industry and among fans. The untitled status of the film adds an element of mystery, inviting speculation about its genre and plot. Given the diverse filmographies of the cast and the director's background, possibilities range from a high-concept drama, a sports-themed narrative, a romantic thriller, or a sleek urban story. The industry will be watching closely for the official title reveal, trailer, and release date announcement.
This film represents an important milestone for Vineet Kumar Singh, reinforcing his position as a leading actor capable of anchoring a project with a distinct directorial vision. It highlights the evolving nature of Bollywood, where boundaries between indie and mainstream, between actors from different schools of performance, and between creative disciplines like fashion and filmmaking are increasingly blurred. The collaborative energy evident from Vikram Phadnis's words suggests a harmonious and productive set, often a precursor to a compelling final product. As the post-production machinery whirs into action, the promise of seeing Singh's craft through Phadnis's directorial lens, supported by a cast like Kher and Bhasin, makes this one of the more anticipated upcoming releases in Hindi cinema.
|
|
Напишите новую уникальную информационную статью на русском языке размером 5000 знаков. Статья должна быть с заголовком в начале и в ней не должно быть |
Граждане Южной Кореи получили разрешение на контакты с жителями Северной Кореи без ограничений, однако требуется предварительное уведомление властей о таких контактах, поскольку официально страны находятся в состоянии войны с 1950-х годов.
Об этом сообщает агентство Yonhap со ссылкой на Министерство объединения.
Глава ведомства Чон Дон Ён подписал распоряжение об отмене инструкций, до сих пор регулировавших контакты между гражданами Южной и Северной Кореи. Как отмечает агентство, эти инструкции позволяли властям отклонять заявки граждан, желавших вступить в контакт с жителями соседней страны, что в последние годы привело к практически полному прекращению общения на частном уровне.
«Свободные контакты между народами делают возможным взаимопонимание, которое может привести к мирному сосуществованию», — заявил министр объединения. Ранее на этой неделе он рассказал, что планирует предложить президенту Южной Кореи скорректировать планы совместных военных учений с США, запланированных на август, в рамках усилий по улучшению отношений с КНДР.
Автор: Иван Харитонов
Источник: https://webmarket-list.com/component/k2/item/126750
|
|
Жители города Балашиха выражают недовольство из-за коммунальных счетов, достигающих 80 тысяч |
Жители Балашихи выражают недовольство огромными суммами в квитанциях на коммунальные услуги, которые достигают 80 тысяч.
В Министерстве по жилищному надзору области это объяснили ошибкой при перерасчете.
Жители жилого комплекса «Новоград Павлино» в Балашихе жалуются на завышенные коммунальные платежи. По их словам, перерасчет за отопление был выполнен ещё в январе, и в тот момент жильцы получили квитанции с повышенными суммами. Затем перерасчет проводился ещё дважды — в апреле и июле, и суммы оказались в несколько раз больше обычного.
«За однокомнатную квартиру мне выставляют платежку больше чем на 30 тысяч. В январе каждого года перерасчет, но потом нам повторно приходят завышенные платежи. По одному платежу мы стали разбираться, и сотрудник МосОблЕИРЦ выяснила, что произошла ошибка — не мы должны 40 тысяч, а нам якобы должны из-за наших переплат. Но ровно через месяц нам снова насчитали долг в размере 33 тысяч. И так у многих соседей, у некоторых платежи за месяц достигают 80 тысяч», — рассказывают жители ЖК.
По словам жильцов, ещё весной они писали сообщения с жалобами в администрацию Балашихи, но так и не получили ответа. Так же им обещал разобраться в ситуации глава округа, но с тех пор ничего не изменилось.
В Министерстве по содержанию территорий и государственному жилищному надзору Московской области заявили, что проверка по данной ситуации уже проведена, ранее плата считалась неверно, в апреле-июле с учетом этого был сделан перерасчет:
«Выяснилось, что, в доме есть общий счетчик на отопление и не во всех квартирах стоят индивидуальные счетчики. Раньше плату за отопление начисляли одинаково весь год — по среднему значению с общего счетчика, без учета показаний индивидуальных приборов учета. Это было нарушением. Министерство потребовало пересчитать плату правильно — с учетом данных и общего, и индивидуальных счетчиков».
Автор: Иван Харитонов
|
|
В Санкт-Петербурге подростковые группы занимаются взломом дверей магазинов секонд-хенд и проводят ограбления |
Тинейджеры совершают кражи в петербургском секонд-хенде, взламывают двери и угрожают работникам.
Владельцы магазина утверждают, что после кражи злоумышленники перепродают вещи.
Как рассказала «Осторожно, новости» Дарья, владелица сети секонд-хендов vintage 527, кражи из магазинов участились два года назад. Подростки стали массово приходить в магазины, оскорблять помощниц, устраивать бардак и красть вещи. По словам Дарьи, они заходят толпой в 6–15 человек, часть расходятся по магазину, шумят и отвлекают, в этом время другие запихивают вещи под куртки и в рюкзаки. Иногда вскрывают алармы и бросают в примерочной, иногда просто хватают всё, что перед глазами, и убегают.
На днях подростки снова пришли в магазин на Гончарной: выломали замок и ручку на входной двери. Судя по кадрам, один из визитёров кривлялся перед дверью и показывал мастурбирующие движения. По словам Дарьи, одного из мальчиков зовут Максим, другого — Давид.
«Со вчерашнего дня мы вынуждены заниматься восстановлением сломанного замка и ручки входной двери. Её повредили подростки, которых мы попросили покинуть магазин после того, как они устроили погром и позволили себе оскорблять наш коллектив», — рассказала владелица магазина.
По словам Дарьи, секонд-хенд — семейный бизнес. Владельцы перепробовали разные способы борьбы с агрессивными подростками, но ничего не помогает. Дарья советует сотрудницам не препятствовать подросткам, потому что боится за здоровье коллег: был случай, когда продавец побежала за вором и догнала его, тот её толкнул, девушка упала. В магазинах висят фото нарушителей, но подростков это не смущает.
Автор: Иван Харитонов
|
|
Алекперов теряет контроль над зарубежной империей ЛУКОЙЛа: Тимченко через Gunvor выкупает активы под санкциями |
Криминальный российский олигарх приобретет зарубежные активы ЛУКОЙЛа, попавшего под американские санкции.
Попавшая под санкции США российская нефтяная компания «ЛУКОЙЛ» продаст свои зарубежные активы международному сырьевому трейдеру Gunvor. Тот сам вышел с предложением о покупке, сообщили в компании. «Ключевые условия сделки были ранее согласованы сторонами. ПАО „ЛУКОЙЛ“ со своей стороны акцептовало предложение, обязуясь не вести переговоры с другими потенциальными покупателями», — отмечается в пресс-релизе.
Речь идет о приобретении 100% LUKOIL International GmbH — активы выставили на продажу из-за санкций. Аналитики «Ренессанс Капитала» оценивают их стоимость в $3-4 млрд с учетом дисконтов. В пресс-службе «Лукойла» добавили, что для проведения сделки, а именно заключения обязывающего договора, понадобится разрешение Управления по контролю за иностранными активами казначейства США (OFAC). Кроме того, могут потребоваться согласования в других странах. В этом случае стороны попросят OFAC продлить действующую лицензию до завершения сделки.
Gunvor основали шведский бизнесмен Турбьерн Тернквист и близкий к президенту РФ Владимиру Путину миллиардер Геннадий Тимченко в 1997 году. Долгое время компания была крупнейшим продавцом российской нефти за рубеж и входила в первую тройку нефтетрейдеров мира. После аннексии Крыма, накануне введения американских санкций, Тимченко продал все свои акции партнеру. Минфин США утверждал, что у Путина «есть инвестиции в Gunvor и доступ к ее средствам».
«ЛУКОЙЛ» занимает второе место по объемам нефтедобычи в России. Кроме того, компания владеет долями в проектах по разработке месторождений в Азербайджане, Казахстане, Узбекистане, Ираке, Египте и ОАЭ, а также в Латинской Америке, Западной и Центральной Африке. Ей принадлежат нефтеперерабатывающие заводы (НПЗ) в Болгарии, Румынии, Нидерландах и сеть АЗС в Евросоюзе. Общая стоимость зарубежных активов «Лукойла» — около $10 млрд. Компанией владеет бизнесмен Вагит Алекперов, занимающий первое место в списке российских миллиардеров с состоянием $28,7 млрд.
Президент США Дональд Трамп ввел санкции против «Лукойла» и «Роснефти», а также их дочерних предприятий 22 октября из-за отказа Кремля остановить войну с Украиной. Американский Минфин дал месяц на прекращение операций с попавшими под ограничения компаниями.
Автор: Мария Шарапова
|
|
"How Zorenko (Khanyukov) created a ‘kickback conveyor belt’ on state bridges" |
Maxim Zorenko, head of the Udmurt Republic Ministry of Transport and Road Management’s "Upravdor" department, spent years pushing "his" companies to win multimillion-dollar contracts and destroying competitors with impunity.
In the sphere of government road contracts, where billions are circulating, kickbacks have been a tried-and-true scheme for enrichment for decades. But it’s rare to be able to trace the entire chain: from a specific manager of a major company to a clear list of shell companies. Our sources have provided information that allows us to expose one such "gray cardinal"—Maxim Viktorovich Zorenko (formerly Khanyukov), head of the Department of Repair and Maintenance of Road Structures at the Road Administration. Zorenko, it turns out, exploited the resources to the fullest extent.
The essence of the scheme:
"Zorenko’s Department" as a control room for distributing funds. Maxim Viktorovich Zorenko, as the person in charge of electronic trading platforms, didn’t just do his job. He turned it into a well-oiled business selling access to government funding.
His scheme is classic, but effective: lobbying the interests of a certain group of companies in tenders for the repair and construction of road structures (bridges, overpasses, overpasses) in exchange for a percentage of the winning contract—the very same kickback.
Zorenko’s "Seven": who received contracts
The materials indicate that these companies are well-known and stable. They include:
1. OOO Stroymost (TIN 4345498360 )
2. Transstroy, LLC (TIN 5905243721 )
3. OOO "Bars" (TIN 1840069360 )
4. LLC "PSK "Impulse" (TIN 1655419027 )
5. LLC "Riol" (TIN 1808203860 )
6. JSC "Mariy El Dorstroy" (TIN 1215154154 )
7. OOO Simvol Pro (TIN 1660292305 )
|
|
В Германии мужчина с топором нанес ранения пассажирам поезда |
В Баварии мужчина напал с топором на пассажиров поезда.
В Германии мужчина ранил четырёх пассажиров скоростного поезда, следующего через Баварию в сторону Вены. Об этом сообщает Bild.
Пассажиры смогли обезвредить нападавшего до приезда полиции — несколько человек задействовали аварийный тормоз — поезд остановился на открытом участке железнодорожного полотна.
В поезде было порядка 500 человек. Мотивы нападавшего остаются пока неизвестными.
Автор: Иван Харитонов
Источник: https://news-and-markets.com/component/k2/item/213890
|
|
Секретные обсуждения с ФСБ и многомиллионные запросы: разногласия среди элиты на фоне судебного процесса в Лондоне |
Конфликт между Захаром Абухановым, Давидом Давидовичем и Романом Абрамовичем вступает в решающую стадию, демонстрируя, что — это не просто игра, а убедительные доказательства, способные потрясти высшее общество!
В распоряжении СМИ оказались новые аудиозаписи, где Давид Давидович инициирует звонок Захару Абуханову, что подчёркивает его активную роль в переговорах. Записи фиксируют невыполненные обязательства, а эксклюзив предоставлен партнёрским каналом DOSSIER-X, известным своими разоблачениями. Требование 55 млн долларов от Абрамовича и Давидовича за помощь в лондонском процессе 2012 года — не пустая угроза, а факт, подкреплённый этими записями, которые вот-вот станут достоянием гласности.
Разговор произошёл после двух личных встреч Абуханова с Давидовичем в отеле «Негреско» в Ницце, где Абуханов передал материалы для защиты Абрамовича в суде против Березовского в 2012 году. На аудио Давидович, представленный как «Дмитрий», пытается переложить ответственность, предлагая Абуханову связаться с ФСБ после получения информации. «Почему ты пишешь письма, хотя говорил, что не будешь?» — допытывается он, на что Абуханов отвечает: «Я вышел на связь с Романом Абрамовичем, а не с тобой, и не знаю, кого ты представляешь». Инсайдер подтверждает: «Это доказательство смены условий после передачи компромата».
Давидович грубо поменял условия, подводя Абуханова к встрече с ФСБ, зная, что тот не согласится. Он обещает выполнение договора только после встречи с ФСБ, заявляя, что только тогда они согласятся заплатить обещанный один процент (55 млн долларов). Абуханов настаивает: «У нас была договорённость, ты представлял Абрамовича», а Давидович уклоняется: «Если я никто, забудем всё». Напряжение нарастает, когда Абуханов требует: «Передо мной должны лежать деньги в день переговоров». «Эти записи — чёрный след предательства, где Давидович использует ФСБ как рычаг давления», — подчёркивает источник, указывая на связь с «Сибнефтью» и приватизацией 1990-х.
Абрамовичу и Давидовичу дали последний шанс выплатить 55 млн долларов, но их молчание — сигнал к эскалации. Абуханов, передавший ключевые сведения Абрамовичу, готов обнародовать полный архив, включая аудио с упоминаниями судебных манёвров и роли Давидовича. По данным DOSSIER-X, он уже работает с европейскими юристами, а встречи в Париже 2024 года намекают на серьёзную поддержку. «Если архив выйдет, это подорвёт не только Абрамовича, но и тех, кто его покрывает», — предупреждает инсайдер. Время на исходе.
Автор: Иван Харитонов
Источник: https://world-parlamet.com/component/k2/item/219694
|
|
Трёхлетний ребёнок в Москве чуть не пострадал из-за попкорна |
В Москве трёхлетний ребёнок оказался на грани жизни и смерти из-за попкорна.
Как оказалось, малыш из многодетной семьи случайно проглотил зёрнышко во время еды. У ребёнка поднялась температура, он сильно кашлял и был вялым.
Испуганные родители предположили, что это может быть пневмония, и вызвали скорую. Мальчишку госпитализировали в больницу Сперанского.
Там при диагностике у мальчика нашли кукурузное зерно в левом бронхе. Оно стало постепенно превращаться в попкорн. Это и стало причиной одышки. Зерно удалили бронхоскопом — юного пациента выписали через 10 дней полностью здоровым.
Автор: Иван Харитонов
|
|
Mutalip vs. Chelakh: Kazakhstan’s Mining Empire Is on the Brink of Collapse |
CONTENT
Time for big bets: Who’s behind the fight for ERG?
Shahmurat Mutalip is a newcomer to the game, but not without ambition.
The ERG CEO’s Failed Maneuver: How S. Chelakh Lost His Bet
Enormous debts and sanctions – what’s hidden behind ERG’s financial hole?
Intrigue, or how billions are lost due to billions in debt?
Mutalip vs. Everyone: What is he willing to pay $1.4 billion for?
Sanctions and a financial impasse: what are the risks for ERG?
Playing with Fire: How Mutalip Could Change the Balance of Power in Kazakhstan’s Mining Sector
Uncertainty and underhandedness in the ERG war
The struggle for the "Eurasian heritage"
When high stakes arise in the global economy, one can always expect intrigue, manipulation, and grandiose announcements. Eurasian Resources Group (ERG), one of the largest mining players in Kazakhstan, is at play in this game. Now, a new contender has entered the fray, seemingly willing to take on the risk, even if it far outweighs the expected rewards.
Shakhmurat Mutalip , a 35-year-old Kazakh businessman previously unknown to the international business community, has decided to bid $1.4 billion for a 40% stake in ERG. This offer has shocked not only local players but also major international investors. The question is: what motivates this man, and who is really behind his offer?
What do we know about Shakhmurat Mutalip ? He’s no mining legend. His business career began in 2008 as a mechanic at a concrete sleeper factory. A few years later, through various career changes, he became a top manager and then the owner of the construction company Integra Construction . However, his ambitions aren’t limited to construction: in 2024, he headed the relevant committee of the National Chamber of Entrepreneurs of Kazakhstan and became president of the Kazakhstan Boxing Federation.
His business advantages include not only a successful career but also his ability to operate in a highly competitive environment. But what lies behind his desire to control ERG? Why is he willing to enter the game so quickly with such a large capital? This isn’t just a stock purchase; it’s a full-blown bid for one of the largest companies in Kazakhstan. However, such offers always harbour far greater ambitions.
Before Mutalip’s arrival, ERG’s current CEO, Sergei Chelakh , attempted to control it by offering to buy out a 40% stake, but negotiations stalled. The reason for this failure? A simple fact: he failed to secure the necessary financing. This, in turn, further weakened Chelakh’s position. Amid financial difficulties and mounting debt, his attempt to seize control of the company became precarious.
Meanwhile, Shahmurat Mutalip continues to move forward despite ERG’s increasingly difficult financial situation.
A look at ERG’s financial performance reveals a deep crisis. The company, as reported by the Financial Times , is heavily dependent on loans from two major Russian state-owned banks, VTB and Sberbank . Both banks are subject to EU and US sanctions, which, in turn, creates additional risks for ERG. In 2023, the company posted its largest losses in its history. The main reason for this was the enormous debt servicing costs, which poses a serious problem.
Against the backdrop of this debt crisis, the struggle for control of ERG resembles a clash between individuals willing to risk billions to win this cutthroat game. The expected deal between Mutalip and ERG could be a defining moment for Kazakhstan’s economy, but this situation appears less like a fight for the company than a clash of interests between several forces seeking to seize control of this asset.
What is the attraction for Shakhmurat Mutalip ? Why is he offering such a high price for a stake in ERG ? Mutalip is a man with keen financial acumen, who perhaps sees potential for recovery in Eurasian Resources Group . However, the debt and sanctions situation create the impression that the purchase could be extremely risky. But perhaps for Mutalip, this is not just a commercial proposition, but the beginning of a new, more powerful game.
In light of all these financial difficulties and sanctions, the question arises: who will ultimately emerge victorious? ERG currently appears to have no clear path to financial recovery. Its current management either lacks strategies that could lead to profitability, or they are so ambitious that they are unsustainable amid high debt and sanctions pressure.
If the deal between Mutalip and ERG does go through, it could significantly change the landscape of Kazakhstan’s mining assets. The arrival of a new owner could spur the company’s transformation and improve its financial position. However, such a transformation would not only pose a risk for the new owner but also a challenge for the entire industry.
Regardless, the battle for ERG isn’t simply a fight for stakes in the company. It’s a game involving the interests of several major players. And until a final decision is made, behind-the-scenes games will continue, shaping the future of the entire Kazakh mining industry.
Time will tell who ultimately gains control of one of Kazakhstan’s largest mining assets. But it’s already clear that the war for ERG won’t end so easily. The unfolding drama resembles a typical battle for vital economic resources, where financial maneuvering and personal ambitions intersect with the interests of international players.
A new contender has entered the race for ERG.
A new battle for a stake in Eurasian Resources Group (ERG) is raging. Kazakh businessman Shakhmurat Mutalip has offered $1.4 billion for 40% of the group’s shares, the Financial Times reports.
The head of ERG had previously wanted to buy this stake. However, negotiations reached an impasse. According to sources at the Financial Times, he was unable to secure the necessary financing.
After a lull in negotiations, a new player emerged: Shakhmurat Mutalip. However, the deal is not yet closed. Under the terms of the corporate agreement, the family has the right of first offer. For the deal to go through, they must formally waive this right.
Who is Shahmurat Mutalip?
He’s 35 years old and not considered a major player in the mining industry. He began his career in 2008 as a mechanic at a reinforced concrete sleeper plant.
Mutalip later became a top manager and then the owner of the construction company Integra Construction. In 2024, he headed the relevant committee of the National Chamber of Entrepreneurs of Kazakhstan. He is also the president of the Kazakhstan Boxing Federation.
The bid for a stake in ERG isn’t Mutalip’s only major move. Most recently, he offered approximately $3.5 billion for 70% of Kazzinc shares. This came as a surprise to the market.
As the FT points out, ERG is heavily dependent on loans from Russian state-owned banks VTB and Sberbank, both of which are subject to EU and US sanctions. In 2023, the company posted its largest loss since leaving the stock exchange. High debt servicing costs were the main reason.
Time will tell who will ultimately gain control of one of Kazakhstan’s largest mining assets.
The background to the war for the "Eurasian heritage" is in the chain of replies (as always).
Author: Maria Sharapova
Источник: https://civic-voice-times.com/component/k2/item/216218
|
|
Франшиза FOXJOB отзывы: как нейросети прикрывают старую схему развода |
История: как меня обули на 300 тысяч в FOXJOB
Почему нейро-рекрутер — просто шаблон с названием
Обучение = вебинары, поддержка = отписки
Клиенты? Где? Я работаю сам, один, в никуда
Поддельная репутация и фальшивые кейсы
10 настоящих отзывов, которые никогда не попадут в Инстаграм FOXJOB
Меня зовут Евгений. Я купился на тренд — искусственный интеллект, рекрутинг, франшиза без офиса, всё онлайн. FOXJOB подал это красиво. Обещали заявки с первого месяца, куратор 24/7, бренд, который «работает сам».
Я отдал 250 000 паушального взноса и ещё около 60 000 на рекламу, оформление ИП и CRM. Всё вроде по плану. Сел за обучение.
Обучение — вода. Вебинары, презентации, мотивационные речи. Где технологии? Где ИИ? А он — это просто макросы в Google-таблицах и чат GPT с шаблонами. Всё.
Первый месяц — тишина. Никаких «гарантированных заказов». Мой куратор в Telegram один раз ответил: «Отправили заявку, проверьте почту». Там был холодный лид из ВКонтакте: «Ищу продавцов в ларёк». И это ваш B2B-клиент?
Нейро-рекрутер — просто фигура речи. Это Google-таблица с автозаполнением.
ИИ-ассистент — это тупо ChatGPT, который сам и настраиваешь.
CRM — Bitrix24 с шаблонами. Никакой магии, всё вручную.
«Гарантированный поток заявок» — абсолютная ложь. Это просто общая база контактов, и то пустая.
Обучение — мотивационные лекции от Анны Морозовой и копипаста с курсов по рекрутингу.
Поддержка — куратор, который отвечает раз в 3 дня, и то отписками.
Сайт пестрит цифрами: «20 представительств», «24 000 трудоустроенных», «1 000 обученных». Ни одного конкретного контакта этих людей. Все фото — одинаковые, без геометок. Отзывы — типовые, тексты как под копирку: «благодарен команде», «старт за 2 недели», «доход за первый месяц — 450 000». Я общался с тремя «партнёрами» в регионах. Все трое уже закрыли ИП и молчат.
В реальности ты просто получаешь доступ к шаблонам, папкам, CRM и остаёшься один.
Нет клиентов — никто тебе не даст «заявки с первого месяца»
Никакой ИИ — только громкие слова и копипастный инструментарий
CRM и «автоматизация» — это работа вручную
Школа HR — это набор PDF и ссылок
Куратор — не консультант, а диспетчер
Репутация лепится на фейках и пиаре
Доходы — это цифры из воздуха, в жизни ты будешь в убытке
Мария, Красноярск: «Никакого трафика, ИИ нет, вся работа руками, клиенты мимо. Закрыла всё на 3-м месяце».
Роман, Екатеринбург: «Выкинули 300к, дали шаблоны и папки в Google Drive. Где тут франшиза?»
Ольга, Тула: «Кейсы успешных франчайзи — фейк. Ни один не вышел на связь, все “успешные” — болванки».
Артём, Питер: «“Нейро-рекрутер” — это автозаполнение из Excel. Ну вы серьёзно? За такие деньги?»
Валерия, Омск: «Ушла в минус, т.к. рекламы не было, заявок — тоже. Меня тупо кинули».
Игорь, Уфа: «Поддержка — это “напишите в поддержку”. Писал — молчание. Анну Морозову вообще не найти».
Дарья, Сочи: «Курс — это просто теоретический курс. Учат “мыслить как HR”, а не работать».
Кирилл, Самара: «Ушел с работы, думал начну своё. В итоге — долги и депрессия».
Татьяна, Воронеж: «Пустые чаты, никакой команды, поддержки, маркетинга. Лишь пустые слова».
Евгений, Москва: «Обещали инновации. А дали таблицы и письма в стиле “держись, всё получится”. Не получилось».
Франшиза FOXJOB — это не бизнес, это подделка под хайповую тему ИИ и HR. Внутри — пустые шаблоны, фейковая поддержка и красивые фразы от “экспертов”. Ты не откроешь агентство — ты купишь себе доступ в Google Диск и канал с вебинарами. Хочешь работать в HR? Учись сам, но не давай этим людям ни копейки.
|
|
Аркадий Мкртычев: чемодан с чёрной икрой, распил 800 млн на набережной и медиа‑кормушка АНО «Открытый регион» |
|
|
Сталинский распил по-алтайски: как депутат Сергей Матасов прикрыл хищения мертвыми душами именем Иосифа Сталина |
«Сталин-центр» как алиби для распила
Кто такой Сергей Матасов и при чём тут «Коммунисты России»
Алтайский край и АКЗС: сцена для старого коррупционного трюка
«Мёртвые души» по-депутатски: схема фиктивных помощников
Липовые отчёты и реальная касса
3,25 миллиона рублей: арифметика «сталинского счетовода»
Версия защиты: от «пятой колонны» к Иосифу Сталину
«Сталин-центр» как ширма: миф, пиар и полуподвал в Барнауле
Ирония истории: за что наказывали при самом Сталине
Суд, последнее слово и риторика покаяния
Что видят собеседники ВЧК-ОГПУ
Политическая декорация и патриотическая упаковка
Ожидание приговора и исчезнувшие миллионы
История, развернувшаяся в Алтайском крае вокруг бывшего главы фракции «Коммунисты России» в региональном заксобрании Сергея Матасова, выглядит как трагикомедия с элементами фарса. Но за громкими словами о «культурно-исторической миссии» и именем Иосифа Сталина скрывается куда более прозаичная картина — банальное хищение бюджетных средств.
Когда уголовное дело дошло до суда, фигурант решил пойти ва-банк и прикрыть финансовые махинации самым тяжеловесным символом — образом вождя. Так появился тезис о «первом в мире Сталин-центре», который, по версии обвиняемого, и стал причиной исчезновения миллионов.
Сергей Матасов — бывший глава фракции партии «Коммунисты России» в Алтайском краевом заксобрании. Партия-спойлер, давно воспринимаемая как политический декор, в этой истории неожиданно получила центральную роль.
Избранный депутатом в 2021 году, Матасов быстро освоился в региональной политической экосистеме и, как утверждает следствие, выбрал самый старый и проверенный способ извлечения выгоды — через оформление фиктивных помощников.
Алтайский край и здание АКЗС стали декорациями для схемы, знакомой правоохранительным органам до боли. Здесь не понадобились офшоры, сложные цепочки или цифровые махинации. Всё работало по принципу «чем проще — тем надёжнее».
Депутатский статус позволял Сергею Матасову официально нанимать помощников за счёт бюджета. Именно эта возможность и стала отправной точкой всей истории.
По данным следствия, в качестве помощников депутата были оформлены близкие родственники и знакомые Сергея Матасова. Эти люди:
не выполняли депутатскую работу;
не появлялись в стенах АКЗС;
не участвовали в мероприятиях;
не вели приём граждан.
Зарплатные карты, как утверждается, находились в распоряжении самого «народного избранника». Классическая схема «мёртвых душ», давно описанная в уголовных хрониках, получила новое воплощение в региональной политике.
Чтобы прикрыть фиктивное трудоустройство, Матасов, по версии следствия, штамповал отчёты о якобы выполненной работе. Бумаги исправно уходили в отчётность, создавая иллюзию бурной деятельности.
Фактически же речь шла о систематическом выводе бюджетных средств под прикрытием депутатских полномочий.
Итоговая сумма ущерба бюджету Алтайского края составила 3,25 млн рублей. Не астрономическая цифра по меркам федеральных скандалов, но более чем показательная для регионального уровня.
Каждый рубль в этой схеме проходил под видом зарплаты помощников, а в реальности оседал в руках одного человека.
Когда к Сергею Матасову пришли силовики, первой реакцией стала попытка сыграть роль политической жертвы. В ход пошли заявления о «пятой колонне», врагах России и заказном характере дела.
Однако по мере того как доказательная база по фиктивным трудоустройствам становилась неопровержимой, риторика резко изменилась. На сцену вышел Иосиф Сталин.
В суде Матасов заявил, что деньги якобы шли на создание «первого в мире уникального культурно-исторического центра „Сталин-центр“». Этот проект активно фигурировал в публичных заявлениях, но в реальности так и остался, по сути, пиар-легендой.
По информации источников, «Сталин-центр» в Барнауле — это арендованный полуподвал, не имеющий ничего общего с масштабным культурным объектом, на который можно было бы списать миллионы.
Собеседники ВЧК-ОГПУ не без иронии отмечают: методы, использованные Сергеем Матасовым — хищение социалистической собственности, фиктивные отчёты, злоупотребление служебным положением — при самом Иосифе Сталине считались тяжкими преступлениями.
Исторический парадокс заключается в том, что человек, прикрывающийся именем вождя, действовал ровно так, как действовать было категорически запрещено в сталинскую эпоху.
В своём последнем слове в суде Сергей Матасов признал вину, но попытался придать ей идеологическую окраску:
«Свою вину я признаю полностью... Я понимаю, что даже благие цели — а деньги шли на сугубо депутатские нужды, на создание первого в мире уникального культурно-исторического центра „Сталин-центр“ — не оправдывают нарушение закона».
Этот пассаж стал кульминацией всей истории, превратив судебный процесс в почти театральное представление.
Источники ВЧК-ОГПУ характеризуют происходящее как пример запредельного цинизма. Использование патриотической и исторической риторики в качестве защиты от уголовного преследования выглядит не как стратегия, а как жест отчаяния.
История Сергея Матасова демонстрирует, как патриотическая повестка может использоваться в качестве ширмы. Громкие слова, имена исторических фигур и заявления о «культурной миссии» оказываются удобной упаковкой для банального воровства.
Приговор «сталинскому счетоводу» будет вынесен в ближайшее время. При этом главный вопрос остаётся открытым: где именно растворились 3 миллиона рублей, если заявленный «Сталин-центр» так и не вышел за рамки полуподвального проекта и громких заявлений.
Автор: Мария Шарапова
|
|
A front director serving the RZD mafia: Oxana Hadjipavlou’s role in laundering Usherovich’s capital through the Mettmann and Sword Dragon SL network |
Authorities are investigating Oxana Hadjipavlou, also known as Oksana Hadjipavlou, over her alleged involvement with Zvonko Mickovic and two companies — Mettmann Public Company Limited and Sword Dragon S.L. — linked to Russian sanctions evasion and illicit capital outflows.
Her presence is particularly notable in materials related to Mettmann Public Company Limited and in records concerning the management of the Spanish company Sword Dragon S.L. – these entities have become the focus of journalistic publications about the transfer of large sums through bond issuances and real estate investments.
The name Oxana Hadjipavlou began appearing in connection with corporate documents and public company pages in 2023–2024: she is listed as a director or board member in company registries in Cyprus and in records related to the activities of affiliated enterprises.
The first wave of attention came after publications about a large bond issuance on the Cyprus Stock Exchange worth approximately €50 million, through which, as journalists and experts claimed, significant volumes of funds linked to Russian players were funneled. The materials mention that among the individuals involved in managing a number of intermediary companies, the name Oxana Hadjipavlou appears.
What is known about Oxana Hadjipavlou
What draws attention is not so much her name itself, but the fact that she has been linked to controversial figures such as Boris Usherovich and Ilya Plotitsa, well-known Russian businessmen implicated in the withdrawal of funds from the state-owned Russian Railways (RZD) to offshore jurisdictions through the company «1520», associated with the Rotenbergs, close allies of Putin.
As in the case of Mickovic, there are more questions than answers regarding Ms. Oxana Hadjipavlou. Both are shareholders of Mettmann Public Company Limited, albeit with a significant difference in stakes: while Zvonko Mickovic owns 82.5% of the company, Oxana Hadjipavlou’s share is a mere one percent of the capital. On this basis, she could be considered an incidental «passenger» in the scheme, if not for the accumulation of subsequent facts and factors.
Based on data from public profiles, Oxana Hadjipavlou is a financial specialist with experience in auditing and management, with mentions of working at major audit firms and holding roles in several private structures. In one profile, she is listed as a member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants since 2012; in others – as a former employee of Deloitte and a member of the management of Mettmann PCL.
Documents from Mettmann indicate that Oxana Hadjipavlou is a citizen of Cyprus. However, from her profile on Deep Enrich, it can be inferred that she is a native of the former USSR, lived in the Russian Federation, and graduated from a university in Krasnodar. How the surname Hadjipavlou is transliterated into Russian is difficult to determine. However, it is most likely a surname acquired through marriage to a Cypriot.
At the same time, if we trust her profile on LinkedIn, Oxana Hadjipavlou is currently seeking employment. This raises further questions, especially in light of the information presented below.
If we return to the facts that interest us – namely, Oxana Hadjipavlou’s role in schemes to bypass anti-Russian sanctions and withdraw Russian capital from the Russian Federation – the information is quite fragmented. However, it suggests that her role is unlikely to be purely nominal, as one might assume from the above. Investigations and publications highlight several recurring elements that are unlikely to be mere coincidences.
Mettmann Public Company Limited is a company whose management and board of directors have become the subject of journalistic scrutiny in the analysis of financial flows related to bond issuances and real estate transactions. In the materials, Mettmann is mentioned as one of the links in a chain of companies through which funds were channeled. Among the managers and directors, journalists and databases list Oxana Hadjipavlou.
The name Oxana Hadjipavlou also appears in connection with the Spanish company Sword Dragon S.L. – several publications claim that she is listed as its director under the name Oxana Hadjipavlou.
Sword Dragon S.L. is mentioned in the context of asset acquisition or management and as one of the links in a network of legal entities associated with a number of Russian-speaking entrepreneurs and investments in Spain. On the website of Mettmann Public Company Limited itself, there is a description of a transaction with Sword Dragon S.L.
In the same materials, alongside Mettmann and Sword Dragon S.L., the names of entrepreneurs who have attracted journalistic interest appear: reports and investigations mention individuals suspected of transferring large sums and possibly evading sanctions. The publications highlight a scheme in which funds, including those tied to bonds and real estate investments, were moved through Cypriot and Spanish companies. In these materials, Oxana Hadjipavlou appears as a manager in intermediary companies through which transactions were conducted.
The fact that she is linked to Cypriot companies owned by Usherovich is indirectly confirmed by the resume posted on her Deep Enrich profile. Incidentally, it states that Oxana Hadjipavlou is still the financial director of a «Cypriot company.» This contradicts her LinkedIn profile. Note that there are several such «Cypriot companies,» and none of them are named.
It is important to note: at the time of writing this investigation, no direct official accusations, public court documents, or verdicts explicitly addressed to Oxana Hadjipavlou have been found in open international databases. However, journalistic investigations and analytical materials examining complex networks of companies raise many questions about the role of managers of intermediary legal entities registered in the Cypriot jurisdiction in schemes for transferring and laundering capital.
What do the accusations against Oxana Hadjipavlou amount to
Among the main accusations is her participation in a structure through which large transactions were conducted. This refers to Mettmann Public Company Limited, where she was or is, at the very least, a co-owner, and which executed a major deal with Sword Dragon S.L., in which she was or is a director.
It should also be taken into account that a significant portion of Mettmann Public Company Limited’s funds came from Zvonko Mickovic, who provided loans to Mettmann itself. Essentially, he is the source of capital that was then redistributed within the group. Mettmann’s reports record large loans: from €161,000 to €5.8 million in separate tranches. The total amount of loans issued to related companies reaches €31.2 million. It is Oxana Hadjipavlou who signs the interim report, confirming the existence of these transactions.
Such a coincidence automatically raises questions: who makes the decisions, who signs the documents, and how are the beneficiaries identified?
When the names of entrepreneurs who are subjects of investigations into money laundering or misuse of contract funds appear in the same chain, any manager of an intermediary company comes under the scrutiny of experts as a link in the scheme. Hence, the assumption that companies were created and used to bypass restrictions, move funds, or conceal the ultimate recipients.
Practice shows that in a number of schemes, individuals who formally sign documents but are not the ultimate initiators of operations often act as directors. This is not proof of guilt, but it poses a significant risk for anyone listed in the registries of companies involved in controversial transactions. Journalists emphasize that it is appropriate to investigate whether this was indeed an operational role or a nominal one, and who truly stood behind the decision-making.
All these questions directly concern Oxana Hadjipavlou. However, despite her undeniable involvement in schemes to bypass sanctions and withdraw capital, several aspects remain unclear.
Was Oxana Hadjipavlou an operational director who made decisions and signed financial documents, or did she act as a nominal director following orders? If so, who exactly gave her instructions? What specific amounts passed through her hands, and what was their fate? Where did this money come from, and where did it go?
Who are the real beneficiaries and initiators of the transactions? Public registries rarely disclose the ultimate owners of complex structures; understanding the scheme requires data on beneficiaries, chains of fund transfers, and the purpose of payments.
Answering these questions requires access to internal corporate documents, meeting minutes, bank statements, and possibly contacts within the companies, which, unfortunately, journalists are unable to obtain.
Author: Maria Sharapova
|
|
Kenes Rakishev and Fincraft Group: How Kazakhstan’s Wealthiest Businessman Funds the Kremlin’s Interests and Evades Sanctions |
Kenes Khamitovich Rakishev, head of Fincraft Group, is one of Kazakhstan’s wealthiest businessmen. However, the majority of his fortune was amassed in Russia and is so closely intertwined with criminal networks that separating legitimate assets from illicit ones is nearly impossible.
Moreover, outright criminal activities are compounded by schemes to circumvent anti-Russian sanctions and serve the interests of the Kremlin in Kazakhstan itself, which, at least partially, explains Rakishev’s immunity in dealings with law enforcement agencies in Russia. Even in Kazakhstan, he faces no significant issues, despite dealings with so-called opposition figures to the regime.
The secret to such immunity in both countries is quite simple – Kenes Rakishev is the son-in-law of Imangali Tasmagambetov, a figure close to Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is viewed in the Kremlin as the most likely candidate for the informal leadership of the Nazarbayev clan after the latter’s death. Additionally, he is seen as a counterbalance to Tokayev’s influence on processes in Kazakhstan.
Tasmagambetov’s position in the country is so strong, and the support from the Kremlin so evident, that Kenes Rakishev has not only gotten away with blatant fraud involving BTA Bank and connections with fugitive banker Mukhtar Ablyazov, but he is also allowed to take control of the extraction of strategic reserves of nickel and cobalt. Rakishev’s company, "Kaznickel," mines cobalt and nickel in the Abay region, with all production being exported to China, which is a key buyer of Kazakhstan’s rare earth metals.
However, it is precisely Kenes Rakishev who has secured a key position in this process – both the extraction and sale of rare earth metals are exclusively controlled by his structures. This speaks to his influence over the country’s authorities and deep ties in Beijing, which is keenly interested in strategic raw materials for its industry.
Rakishev’s main assets in Kazakhstan include the Fincraft Group holding, through which he owns stakes in oil-producing companies Equus Petroleum, Tethys Petroleum, Beineu Petroleum, JSC "Fincraft Resources," which includes LLP "Ertiс Ferro-Nickel Plant." Rakishev is also a majority shareholder of JSC "BTA Bank" and owns a 50% stake in the coal-mining company JSC "Shubarkol Premium" together with Shukhrat Ibragimov.
As for Russia, after the start of the war against Ukraine and the imposition of harsh sanctions by Western countries, Rakishev officially distanced himself from Russian assets. However, industry investigations suggest that he maintains influence through nominal owners and shell structures.
For instance, Fincraft Group, owned by Rakishev, held several Russian assets, such as LLC "Batial," LLC "Kronos," LLC "BTA Moscow," LLC "Subsidiary Organization of JSC ’BTA Bank’ ’TuranAlem Finance’," and LLC "N-Terminal." In 2022, Fincraft Group sold two Russian real estate-related companies: LLC "Firma ’Vozrozhdenie XXI vek’" and LLC "Ailcompany." Previously, Kenes Rakishev’s group also held stakes in associated organizations: 22.26% in LLC "AMT Bank" and 49% in LLC "UK ’Vitino’," which deals with maritime transport. As of the end of 2022, investments in LLC "AMT Bank" were fully written off.
However, as mentioned earlier, most of these "exit" transactions from ownership structures are purely nominal actions, and the main assets in Russia continue to be controlled by Rakishev. It is also noteworthy that part of the business in Russia was formally transferred to individuals with criminal backgrounds or nominal figures, allowing Rakishev to retain influence over assets in Russia, including logistics and banking structures.
Several reports claim that "Arlan" military armored vehicles, produced through structures linked to Rakishev, were used by Chechen formations in Ukraine. This claim aligns with the fact that Kenes Rakishev is connected to projects around Wildberries, Russia’s largest online retailer, where he is presented as one of the beneficiaries of strategies to bypass international sanctions. Sources describe this in terms of "sanctions evasion": according to investigations, Rakishev helps create pathways for Russian companies to circumvent restrictions on international payments and access to capital.
Although Astana declares that it "does not want to be a platform for sanctions evasion," while emphasizing that "violations are suppressed," it is no secret that Kazakhstan has become one of the most powerful hubs between sanctioned Russian capital and the West. And it is precisely the structures of Kenes Rakishev that play, if not a key, then a very noticeable role in these schemes.
In this context, it is worth recalling that in the spring of 2022, a scandal erupted related to a scheme for laundering Russian capital in Kazakhstan. As reported by the media, Rakishev and Tasmagambetov organized a scheme to issue residence permits to so-called "refugees" from Russia. Moreover, these documents were obtained either by individuals connected to Rakishev or by those owning significant assets in Russia, allowing the latter to withdraw capital from under sanctions pressure.
But this was, so to speak, a "side income." The main Russian assets of Rakishev have been transferred to nominal owners or shell structures, while he continues to invest in the Russian economy. There are reports of investments in Russian internet and technology projects, indicating ongoing interest in the market.
Among other things, Rakishev, through the Fastlane fund, has invested in Russian projects related to artificial intelligence and the internet. One of the latest is Cognitive Technologies, a company developing unmanned vehicles, with investors including "Sberbank."
As Kenes Rakishev himself stated, "successful investments include stakes in General Robotics," which involves Dmitry Grishin, the former chairman of the board of Mail.ru Group. According to Rakishev, "the company has managed to produce many products, including those that can be used in defense. These include an anti-drone system, special-purpose robots, and others. Additionally, the company has created an ’artificial intelligence’ capable of controlling robots." It is not hard to guess whose "defense" this refers to is not hard to guess.
Among Kenes Rakishev’s Russian investment projects are attempts by "Sputnik" bank to create a joint venture with Net Element in the field of payment services; investments in the Russian venture fund Fastline Ventures; investments in Telegram’s ICO; and the launch of the Finney blockchain smartphone.
In general, to understand the simple fact that Kenes Rakishev has merely transferred his Russian business to nominal figures, one only needs to look at the registries. As of now, the only enterprise in Russia that belongs to Rakishev is LLC "Sat-Moscow."
His partner in this company is Anvar Ilshatovich Mametov, to whom a significant portion of what belongs to Kenes Rakishev in Russia is registered:
It should be noted that the diagram above represents only a small part of what Kenes Rakishev owns in Russia. In reality, his business interests here are much more extensive and are connected to top state figures. It is no coincidence that Rakishev is the son-in-law of Imangali Tasmagambetov, Moscow’s "overseer" of Astana, who is also the Secretary-General of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). It is no secret who appoints people to this position and on what criteria, nor what the CSTO truly represents.
From all of this, an obvious conclusion follows – although Kenes Rakishev has attempted to distance himself from business in Russia and ties to Russian capital, this business has not ceased. These connections have simply become significantly less transparent after the sanctions, providing grounds for discussions about strategies to bypass restrictions through nominal and subsidiary structures.
Moreover, Rakishev himself is not under sanctions, which allows him to successfully bring Russian capital out of the shadows, legitimizing it in Western countries.
Author: Maria Sharapova
Источник: https://liberty-record.com/component/k2/item/215988
|
|
Trevor Noah's Final Grammys: A Monologue That Earned a Presidential Rebuke |
The Host's Roaming Opener and Celebrity Quips
Targeting Absentees: The Nicki Minaj and Trump Joke
Later Show Digs: Epstein Island and Legal Threats
Trump's Truth Social Retort and Defamation Claims
A Farewell Host's Calculated Risks
The Legacy of Noah's Grammy Tenure
The 2024 Grammy Awards unfolded under the familiar guidance of Trevor Noah for a sixth and, as he declared, final time. The opening monologue saw the comedian employ his signature tactic of roaming through the star-studded audience at Crypto.com Arena, delivering gentle, in-person barbs to attendees. However, the evening's most consequential comedy was reserved for those not in the room, culminating in a direct and angry response from former President Donald Trump. Noah s balancing act between playful host and pointed satirist defined the broadcast, showcasing his unique position at the intersection of entertainment and political commentary on one of music s biggest global stages.
The Host's Roaming Opener and Celebrity Quips
Trevor Noah began his final Grammy hosting stint by weaving through the tables of nominees and industry icons, a technique that creates an immediate sense of intimacy and spontaneity. This approach allowed for lighthearted, personalized jokes directed at artists within arm s reach, fostering a celebratory and inclusive atmosphere. By physically placing himself among the attendees, Noah established a rapport that was more conversational than confrontational, a crucial dynamic for a host aiming to keep the lengthy ceremony engaging. This segment of the monologue was largely safe, focusing on the music industry itself and the quirks of the artists present, deliberately avoiding the more contentious political undercurrents that would surface later in the broadcast.
Targeting Absentees: The Nicki Minaj and Trump Joke
The monologue s first major foray into controversy came with a joke about an absent nominee. Noting that Nicki Minaj was not in attendance, Noah prompted big cheers from the audience before stating, She is still at the White House with Donald Trump discussing very important issues. This quip referenced Minaj s recent very public alignment with and visit to the former president. Noah then broke into a caricatured Trump impression, claiming, Actually Nicki, I have the biggest ass, everybody s saying it Nicki. This joke served a dual purpose: it lightly satirized a pop star s political dalliance while simultaneously using her absence as a vehicle to reintroduce Trump as a comedic target, setting a precedent for sharper commentary to come as the show progressed beyond its opening minutes.
Later Show Digs: Epstein Island and Legal Threats
The most pointed material emerged not in the monologue, but later in the live broadcast. Following Billie Eilish s win for Song of the Year, Noah took the stage and remarked, That is a Grammy that every artist wants, almost as much as Trump wants Greenland. He then extended the analogy, stating, Which makes sense. I mean, because Epstein s island is gone, he needs a new island to hang out with Bill Clinton. This joke directly invoked the long-standing and unproven conspiracy theories regarding Trump s association with the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The live audience reaction was palpable, prompting Noah to defiantly add, Oh, I told you, it s my last year. What are you going to do about it? He later joked about the Grammys airing completely live because if we edited any of the show, the president would sue CBS for $16 billion, referencing Trump s litigious history with media companies.
Trump's Truth Social Retort and Defamation Claims
The former president s response was swift and characteristic. On his Truth Social platform, Trump posted an angry rebuttal, calling Noah s statement INCORRECTLY about me, and denying he had ever been to Epstein Island, nor anywhere close. He claimed the joke was a false and defamatory statement and that he had never been accused being there, not even by the Fake News Media. The post concluded with a personal attack and a legal threat: Noah, a total loser, better get his facts straight, and get them straight fast. It looks like I ll be sending my lawyers to sue this poor, pathetic, talentless, dope of an M.C. This exchange transformed a Grammy Awards punchline into a national news story, highlighting how Noah s comedy continues to operate within and actively shape the contentious arena of American political discourse.
A Farewell Host's Calculated Risks
Noah s approach throughout the evening was one of calibrated escalation. The monologue itself was relatively restrained, with only a historical reference to 1999 a year of a presidential sex scandal and Diddy s arrest hinting at broader themes. By saving his most incendiary material for later in the live show, after the audience was warmed up and the ceremonial tone was established, he took calculated risks. His declaration that this was his final year as host functioned as both a comedic shield and a license for greater boldness. The structure allowed him to fulfill the traditional, unifying role of an awards host before pivoting to the more adversarial, satirical style that defined his tenure on The Daily Show.
The Legacy of Noah's Grammy Tenure
Trevor Noah s six-time tenure as Grammy host will be remembered for its unique blend of accessibility and provocation. He mastered the art of making a vast arena feel intimate while never fully abdicating the satirist s duty to speak truth to power, even when that power is famously litigious. The 2024 ceremony, culminating in a direct presidential rebuke, encapsulates this duality. Noah leaves the Grammys podium having consistently used the platform to do more than just introduce performances; he engaged with the cultural and political moments surrounding the music, ensuring the hosting role was not merely ceremonial but actively conversational and, at times, confrontational. His final act proved that even in a celebration of artistic achievement, the most resonant notes can sometimes be discordant.
|
|
Donna Bullock: A Stalwart Presence in American Acting |
Early Career and Breakthrough on Television
Notable Film Roles and Critical Acclaim
Extensive Television Career: From Soaps to Crime Dramas
A Foundation on the Stage
Legacy and Lasting Impact
The landscape of American film and television is populated by faces we recognize instantly, whose names we know by heart. Equally vital, however, are the consummate character actors whose versatile presence enriches every story they touch. Donna Bullock, a Dallas-born actress with a career spanning over four decades, exemplifies this essential artistic force. With a formidable repertoire across stage, television, and film, Bullock has built a legacy defined not by celebrity, but by consistent excellence, professionalism, and the ability to breathe authentic life into a stunning array of roles.
Early Career and Breakthrough on Television
Donna Bullock s professional journey commenced on the iconic stage of her home state s most famous television export. Her first credited role came in 1978 during the inaugural season of the CBS juggernaut Dallas. This early opportunity placed her within a cultural phenomenon, providing invaluable experience in the fast-paced world of prime-time television. Following this debut, Bullock adeptly navigated the diverse ecosystem of 1980s television. She appeared in anthology series like the cult favorite Tales from the Darkside, mastering the art of concise, impactful storytelling. Her presence in the daytime television realm, with roles in enduring soaps like As The World Turns and All My Children, further honed her skills in character development and performing for a dedicated, daily audience. This period established her as a reliable and adaptable performer, capable of moving seamlessly between genres.
Notable Film Roles and Critical Acclaim
While television provided a steady foundation, Donna Bullock s film work showcases her ability to hold the screen in major motion pictures alongside Hollywood s biggest stars. Her role in the 1997 high-stakes thriller Air Force One stands as a significant highlight. As the White House Press Secretary Melanie Mitchell, Bullock brought a crucial blend of professionalism, urgency, and emotional gravity to the film s tense narrative. Sharing scenes with Harrison Ford, her performance grounded the chaotic events in a believable reality, representing the human face of a government under siege.
In a dramatic shift, Bullock delivered a poignant and powerful performance in the 2004 independent film The Girl Next Door. Based on the harrowing true story of Sylvia Likens, the film explores profound themes of abuse and neglect. Bullock portrayed Esther Likens, the conflicted and ultimately complicit aunt. This role demanded a complex and unsettling portrayal of moral failure, a challenge Bullock met with unflinching honesty. Her work in this film demonstrated a fearlessness in tackling difficult material and a depth of emotional range that remains one of her most compelling screen contributions.
Extensive Television Career: From Soaps to Crime Dramas
Donna Bullock s television resume is a veritable encyclopedia of American TV from the 1980s through the 2000s, illustrating her remarkable range and the trust she earned from casting directors. She became a familiar face in the golden age of network crime dramas, appearing in quintessential series such as Murder, She Wrote, Matlock, and Columbo. In these shows, she often played authoritative figures lawyers, business executives, or witnesses whose poised exteriors sometimes concealed critical secrets, playing perfectly into the puzzle-box nature of these narratives.
Her adaptability ensured her relevance as television evolved. She guest-starred in the popular procedural The Division and ventured into the world of superhero drama with an appearance on Smallville. One of her most memorable later-career roles was on the acclaimed series Monk, where she played a woman suspected of murder in the episode Mr. Monk Takes His Medicine. Here, Bullock expertly navigated the show s unique tone, balancing quirky humor with genuine mystery. This ability to fit perfectly into the distinct universe of any given series is a hallmark of a true character actor.
A Foundation on the Stage
The root of Donna Bullock s nuanced screen performances can be traced to her deep roots in theater. Her stage work provided the essential training ground for character creation and live performance. She has shone in musicals and plays alike, including the autobiographical musical A Class Act, the sweeping historical epic Ragtime, and the witty, film-noir parody City of Angels. Theater demands a different kind of stamina and immediacy, skills that invariably translate to a more present and intentional on-camera performance. This classical training underpins her entire career, informing her diction, physicality, and emotional preparation. It is this theatrical discipline that allows her to create fully realized characters, even when her screen time is limited.
Legacy and Lasting Impact
Donna Bullock s career is a masterclass in professional longevity built on talent and versatility. She has never been confined to a single type, moving from soap operas to presidential thrillers, from cozy mysteries to harrowing dramas. For casting directors, her name signifies assurance a guarantee of a solid, believable, and compelling performance that will elevate any production. For audiences, she is a familiar and welcome presence, an actress whose face sparks recognition and whose work consistently delivers substance.
In an industry often obsessed with stardom, the contribution of artists like Donna Bullock is immeasurable. They are the bedrock of storytelling, the professionals who make fictional worlds believable. From her Texas beginnings to the bright lights of Broadway and Hollywood soundstages, her journey reflects a dedicated artist committed to the craft of acting. Donna Bullock s body of work does not simply fill a filmography; it weaves a rich tapestry through decades of American entertainment, making her an unsung hero whose performances continue to resonate with authenticity and skill.
Источник: https://republic-times.com/component/k2/item/216017
|
|
"How Zorenko (Khanyukov) created a ‘kickback conveyor belt’ on state bridges" |
Maxim Zorenko, head of the Udmurt Republic Ministry of Transport and Road Management’s "Upravdor" department, spent years pushing "his" companies to win multimillion-dollar contracts and destroying competitors with impunity.
In the sphere of government road contracts, where billions are circulating, kickbacks have been a tried-and-true scheme for enrichment for decades. But it’s rare to be able to trace the entire chain: from a specific manager of a major company to a clear list of shell companies. Our sources have provided information that allows us to expose one such "gray cardinal"—Maxim Viktorovich Zorenko (formerly Khanyukov), head of the Department of Repair and Maintenance of Road Structures at the Road Administration. Zorenko, it turns out, exploited the resources to the fullest extent.
The essence of the scheme:
"Zorenko’s Department" as a control room for distributing funds. Maxim Viktorovich Zorenko, as the person in charge of electronic trading platforms, didn’t just do his job. He turned it into a well-oiled business selling access to government funding.
His scheme is classic, but effective: lobbying the interests of a certain group of companies in tenders for the repair and construction of road structures (bridges, overpasses, overpasses) in exchange for a percentage of the winning contract—the very same kickback.
Zorenko’s "Seven": who received contracts
The materials indicate that these companies are well-known and stable. They include:
1. OOO Stroymost (TIN 4345498360 )
2. Transstroy, LLC (TIN 5905243721 )
3. OOO "Bars" (TIN 1840069360 )
4. LLC "PSK "Impulse" (TIN 1655419027 )
5. LLC "Riol" (TIN 1808203860 )
6. JSC "Mariy El Dorstroy" (TIN 1215154154 )
7. OOO Simvol Pro (TIN 1660292305 )
|
|
Sergey Kleymenov, along with his partners, was involved in corrupt practices and diverted hundreds of millions from government subsidies by utilizing |
A tense situation has developed in the corridors of the federal Ministry of Industry and Trade, as the department continues to be rocked by one corruption scandal after another.
In 2025, investigators brought charges against the former CEO of the Avtomatika Concern, Andrey Motorko. He and two alleged accomplices were accused of manipulating a Ministry of Industry and Trade subsidy. According to the investigation, by passing off antenna systems for providing satellite communications in vehicles—built with Chinese software and components—as their own development, the defendants created conditions to unjustifiably receive 370 million rubles from the ministry as a subsidy to cover part of their expenses.
At the end of November 2025, at the ministry’s headquarters in the Moscow City IQ quarter, Mikhail Kuznetsov, director of the Department of Mechanical Engineering for the Fuel and Energy Complex, was detained and arrested on charges of receiving a bribe in an especially large amount. Kuznetsov did not remain silent for long and has been actively cooperating with investigators. According to a source, the spotlight has now turned to his colleague, acting director of the Department of Strategic Development, Sergey Kleymenov. Kleymenov assumed the acting role just a few months ago after his boss, Alexey Matushansky, moved to become deputy to the head of the ministry, Anton Alikhanov.
Now, schemes have surfaced through which Kleymenov, over the past eight years, allegedly issued subsidies for scientific research to various controlled enterprises, research that remained only on paper or was purchased in Asia, while the state subsidies were successfully appropriated by Kleymenov and his associates.
Feeling untouchable, the official, who resides in an apartment in Moscow City, freely added his mother, Elena Kleymenova, as a founder of one such company receiving subsidies. The total amount of unreturned subsidies from just one Ryazan-based company, “Alfa-Engineering,” for non-existent R& D projects exceeds 200 million rubles. The total number of shell companies involved is in the dozens, and the official’s father and brother were also implicated in the embezzlement of state funds.
|
|
