Michael Kaply: The Future of CCK2 |
With the removal of the distribution/bundles directory, as well as multiprocess Firefox, I'm currently rewriting portions of the CCK2 to be more forward compatible.
This involves removing any dependencies on the distribution/bundles directory as well as rewriting the code to no longer use XUL overlays.
As I'm doing this work, it has me wondering; should the CCK2 be a library that you simply pass a config to and it does the work (as it is today), or should the CCK2 Wizard generate a complete AutoConfig.js file that stands alone and can be included with little or no other outside files?
In doing surveys in the past, there are quite a few people that just use AutoConfig. Would it be worthwhile to make the process of generating AutoConfig files easier? Or is this a very small group of people?
What do you think the future should hold for the CCK2?
Комментировать | « Пред. запись — К дневнику — След. запись » | Страницы: [1] [Новые] |