Adam Lofting: Something special within ‘Hack the snippet’ |
Here are a couple of notes about ‘Hack the snippet‘ that I wanted to make sure got documented.
Behind these observations, something special was happening in ‘Hack the snippet’. I can’t tell you exactly what it was that had the end-effect, but it’s worth remembering the effect.
Same audience, same engagement rate, same ask… but triple the conversion rate (most regular snippet traffic converted ~2%, ‘Hack the snippet’ traffic converted ~7%).
Something within that experience (and likely the overall quality of it) makes the Webmaker proposition more appealing to people who ‘hacked the snippet’. It could be one of many things: the simplicity, the guided learning, the feeling of power from editing the Firefox start page, the particular phrasing of the copy or many of the subtle design decisions. But whatever it was, it worked.
We need to keep looking for ways to recreate this.
Not everything we do going forwards needs to be a ‘Hack the snippet’ snippet (you can see how much time and effort went into that in the bug).
But when we think about these new-user experiences, we have a benchmark to compare things too. We know how much impact these things can have when all the parts align.
This is a quicker note:
Again, this doesn’t give us an immediate thing we can repeat, but it gives us a benchmark to build on.
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/adamlofting/blog/~3/u7RaSKTvEHc/
Êîììåíòèðîâàòü | « Ïðåä. çàïèñü — Ê äíåâíèêó — Ñëåä. çàïèñü » | Ñòðàíèöû: [1] [Íîâûå] |