-Ïîèñê ïî äíåâíèêó

Ïîèñê ñîîáùåíèé â rss_paulrandal

 -Ïîäïèñêà ïî e-mail

 

 -Ïîñòîÿííûå ÷èòàòåëè

 -Ñòàòèñòèêà

Ñòàòèñòèêà LiveInternet.ru: ïîêàçàíî êîëè÷åñòâî õèòîâ è ïîñåòèòåëåé
Ñîçäàí: 18.05.2009
Çàïèñåé:
Êîììåíòàðèåâ:
Íàïèñàíî: 0


Read committed doesn’t guarantee much…

Âòîðíèê, 17 Àïðåëÿ 2018 ã. 22:05 + â öèòàòíèê

A while back I was involved in an email thread where people were wondering about some ‘weird’ behavior from SQL Server. The problem was occurring on SQL Server 2016 and used the default isolation level of read committed. The scenario was as follows: Create a table with a few columns Batch 1: In one SSMS window, [&]

The post Read committed doesnt guarantee much& appeared first on Paul S. Randal.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PaulSRandal/~3/dtpqd_OwfHk/

Ìåòêè:  

 

Äîáàâèòü êîììåíòàðèé:
Òåêñò êîììåíòàðèÿ: ñìàéëèêè

Ïðîâåðêà îðôîãðàôèè: (íàéòè îøèáêè)

Ïðèêðåïèòü êàðòèíêó:

 Ïåðåâîäèòü URL â ññûëêó
 Ïîäïèñàòüñÿ íà êîììåíòàðèè
 Ïîäïèñàòü êàðòèíêó