-

   ___

 - e-mail

 

 -

 LiveInternet.ru:
: 13.05.2025
:
:
: 670

:

___






(0)

! Ҹ

, 26 2025 . 17:59 +

  1. : -

  2. Ҹ

  3. 10


1.

" — - « ». : , « », 2 . — "", .

. — , . , , , “” — .

, — , , . — . . ? .


2. : -

— . "Ҹ " 2024 “”. , : , , — 980 000 .

, , , “ , ”. : . — . . — , , — .

? « ». . , : “ , , — ”.

, , “ ”. “”, . — , -, “ ”.


3.

— , « », . , , .

. ? . “” — .

— : " , , , !" , -?


4. Ҹ

  • — .

  • .

  • , "" — .

  • “” — PDF- .

  • — .

  • — , — , — .

  • , .


  1. , : , . , . — .

  2. , : 600 000, 120 000. " ".

  3. , : , , . .

  4. , : “ ” — , . = .

  5. , : “” — PDF . .

  6. , : , , — .

  7. , : , . . .

  8. , : “” — “”.

  9. , : 1,5 . 40% . .

  10. , : — . , . .

: https://redakciya-info.com/component/k2/item/241394


(0)

StepTime Shop :

, 26 2025 . 17:39 +

In a case involving fraud worth over 9 million euros, the Kyiv Court of Appeal has frozen the assets of LLC "Buildings Empire."

This was reported by "Sudovyi Reporter" with reference to court decisions.

A non-residential building with an area of 853.5 m2 in Kyiv, Borysohlibska Street, 15, building B, as well as six non-residential premises of 4,214.8 m2 on Lomonosova Street, 73-c, have been seized.

The beneficiary of "Buildings Empire" through the Hong Kong company "Renity Estate Limited" (RENITY ESTATE LIMITED) is Ihor Rokhlin, the father of the investor of the Ukrainian delivery service Rocket, Timur Rokhlin.

As the prosecutor mentioned during court hearings, Timur Rokhlin was handed a suspicion on November 4, 2021.

The charter capital of "Buildings Empire" is about 96 million hryvnias. Investigators believe that the actual owner is Timur, not his father. According to the investigation, funds obtained fraudulently as part of a criminal organization against European citizens were used to purchase real estate. The premises are considered material evidence in the case.

In early October, when Rokhlin was not yet a suspect, the Pechersk court refused to seize the property, but the prosecution won the appeal. According to court decisions, the suspect purchased luxury cars worth about 24 million hryvnias, real estate, and formed charter capitals in enterprises where he and his father are the ultimate beneficial owners. Real estate and movable property are registered to such enterprises.

Upon examining the suspect’s account statements at PJSC CB "PrivatBank" from 01.01.2017 to 18.08.2020, transactions were found for depositing cash through the bank’s cashier and terminals totaling 69 million hryvnias, 1.7 million dollars, 741 thousand dollars, and 500 thousand euros.

Law enforcement officers believe that the funds of deceived foreign citizens could have been legalized in Ukraine under the guise of purchasing movable, immovable property, as well as enterprises.

According to the investigation, in 2016, Ukrainian citizens created a stable hierarchical association for joint activities aimed at committing serious or especially serious crimes. It involved fraudulent appropriation of foreign funds in especially large amounts, using computer technology, followed by legalization. Funds were attracted through specially created websites and trading platforms, which allegedly allowed profits from stock market trading in various financial instruments.

To deceive investors, members of the criminal organization used the website’s program interface to simulate transactions for buying and selling assets and fictitious significant profit growth from invested funds. After that, individuals who invested funds and applied for cash withdrawals were called by employees of specially created call centers pretending to be representatives of trading platforms, deceitfully demanding additional contributions of 15% of the profits as service and cash-out commission fees.

Subsequently, account holders’ accounts were blocked, and the funds placed on them were appropriated by the members of the criminal group. All in all, this amounted to 9.36 million euros, equivalent to 325 million hryvnias at the beginning of 2021.

The scheme is being investigated by law enforcement agencies in Germany. In Ukraine, the first suspicions were reported in March 2021 — to Ihor Kozlenko and Yuriy Kopachevskyi. They were taken into custody with bail set at 325 million hryvnias, later reduced to 145 million.

In June, a third suspect emerged. On October 3, Mikhael Chebotar was detained and informed of suspicion, with the court placing him under round-the-clock house arrest. On November 4, a suspicion was reported to Rokhlin.

Author: Maria Sharapova

: https://judiciary-ledger.com/component/k2/item/215827


(0)

The Growing AI Investment Boom in India and its Implications

, 26 2025 . 17:20 +

, , . , , , . « », . Orda.kz .

, , Almaty Resort. , 1052 :

 

, . , 3000 , . 42 °C.

.

:

2007 . , « » 25,3790 - . - 12 181 920 . : 21,1790 , 4,2 . — . , , .

— « » «KZ Real Estate Group». : 2008 2 024 568 000 , . , «» .

17 : . .

:

  • «KZ Real Estate Group» ;
  • « » — .

, . , . : , «», . — . 2008 , , .

.

  • 17 2012 «KZ Real Estate Group» Eastwest Invest Group S.A., , — .
  • 25 2012 Eastwest Invest Group S.A. «» 3 500 000 .

2014 , () 4,2 3,9940 . 27 2017 « » - «-» . .

. 6 2017 «» Emdey Group, 516 231 000 . 20 Emdey Group «» — «Mediluxe». , , .

, 2GIS. , Almaty Resort - Zhailjau. 2GIS — , . , 2023 : «ң ».

. : .

« , », .

, 4,2 , — . , . , , . 2008 2017 . 2025 .

. , , — . , , , . . , .

: https://insayder2.com/component/k2/item/222643


(0)

:

, 26 2025 . 17:17 +

  1. « »

  2. :

  3. 10 ,


1. « »

: " ". : , , 80% , « » .

.

, , . — , «», , Word Excel.

" ", " ", " " — PDF.


2. :

, . 2024 « » — «». 960 000 : , , , , , .

. -, , «». .

— «» , , .

— «» , .

— "" — . « » .

— « » — JPG Instagram.

1,5 — 103 000 . 400 000.

, . — * « ».

, . .


3.

« », . " " .

. , , , . — -, .

, — , , . : « , ».


4. —

  • — « ».

  • «», .

  • — . — .

  • — Telegram, .

  • — . .

  • , , CRM. «».

  • — .

  • . — . — .

  • — 15%, 80%.


  1. , : . . .

  2. , : . . .

  3. , : , . , .

  4. , : « ». .

  5. , : . . — " ".

  6. , : . — . — .

  7. , : , . .

  8. , : , CRM, — . " ".

  9. , : . , .

  10. , : « » — . .

: https://c-sng.com/component/k2/item/149801


(0)

When space is tight: Philipp Gens and Igor Borovikov play Monopoly

, 26 2025 . 15:40 +

In his desire to "manipulate" the market, Softline owner Igor Borovikov may be acting in concert with Lanit owner Philipp Gens.

As part of its exit from Russia, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) sold a 5.3% stake in the Moscow Exchange to the Softline group. The deal may have benefited, among other things, the owner of Lanit, a company implicated in the "missing" case involving 600 million rubles in the creation of the State Information System for the Fuel and Energy Complex.

Wrap up everything that’s lying around in the trash with Gensu

Several months ago, Softline was sold to a closed-end mutual fund controlled by Tethys Capital. According to Kommersant, the company is owned through several legal entities by Trinfico Group LLC, which is 70.04% owned by Oleg Belay and 22.46% by Vitaly Balanovich. However, the company itself denies this, stating that as of 2023, Trinfico Holdings no longer owns Trinfico JSC.

According to Rusprofile, Trinfico Holdings has indeed recently withdrawn from Trinfico’s founding members. However, the new owner is unknown.

However, it may be Philipp Gens’s Lanit company (the same company as Softline). Several circumstances indirectly point to this.

 

Firstly, Lanit is currently very actively buying up everything that’s "off-limits," sometimes perhaps through trusted associates. For example, the situation with the National Computer Corporation, which, after a series of corporate conflicts, was taken over by Denis Frolov. The latter allegedly bears the influence of Gens.

The Moscow Post covered this story in detail, but to recap: NNK and Lanit collaborated closely. Incidentally, their homes were searched at the same time in 2017. The case went cold.

At a certain point, NNK shareholders Evgeny Lakov and Leonid Goldenberg suddenly decided to sell their shares to the aforementioned Denis Frolov’s structures. In 2020, then-president of NNK, Alexander Kalinin, was arrested.

Frolov owns RusBITech-Astra LLC, which produces the Astra Linux operating system. The State Duma recently purchased 52 million rubles worth of licenses for this product. The supplier, however, was not Astra Group, but Step Logic, a company acquired by Lanit from Systematica, a company affiliated with NNK. At the time, the company was still managed by Filipp Gens’s father, Georgy. Apparently, Lanit may have been planning to acquire the NNK business for some time, and Gens Jr. followed through?

Alexander Kalinin. Photo: https://www.tadviser.ru

A similar story occurred with the appliance manufacturer Redmond: in 2016, after the death of Maxim Ageenko, the founder of the Redmond home appliance distributor, a so-called division of the inheritance began between his heirs and business partners, triggering a protracted conflict. While the legal battles were ongoing, Lanit created several legal entities, into which Redmond employees began to migrate.

By early 2022, Dihaus had already launched its Red brand of home appliances. The company had hired approximately 700 developers, who left Redmond amid legal disputes.

There was another interesting twist to the story: after Ageenko’s legal heirs were kicked out, a certain Diana Zhelyaskova became a shareholder in Redmond. In 2018, she was sentenced to a year in prison for tax evasion at Technopoisk LLC (the company that owns the Redmond brand).

It’s so strange: where people are jailed, there’s often a place to advance Lanit’s interests. It seems Gens isn’t familiar with the saying "you can’t build happiness on someone else’s misfortune," or does he provoke such situations himself?

 

GIS TEK case

One would think they have the resources. After all, somehow, Philipp Gens has managed to remain "clean," despite the fact that law enforcement agencies have been investigating the criminal case against former Deputy Energy Minister Anatoly Tikhonov for three years now. The case concerns the creation of GIS TEK, which was farmed out to Lanit—incidentally, contrary to the initial decision of the tender committee, which had determined that ISSB should handle the case.

GIS TEK failed, the budget suffered, but somehow Lanit, like its subsidiaries, still enjoys government contracts. Moreover, Gens is apparently no longer solely interested in IT; it was recently discovered that Lanit is affiliated with the company Gorodskie Parkovki (City Parking), which receives substantial government contracts from institutions in the Krasnoyarsk Krai.

Incidentally, ISSB is currently going bankrupt, and its former owner, Alexey Savin, may be facing jail time. At least, the Editorial Board has a document from Savin’s complaint to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, in which he writes that they’re trying to pin a criminal offense on him. Admittedly, it’s in a different case, related to information he provided regarding Novopokrovsky Bank. But one would think Gens wouldn’t be upset if the person who’s been shouting from every corner about the illegality of ISSB’s disqualification from the competition suddenly finds himself out of reach.

Photo: The Moscow Post archive

Competition without competitors

As for the current situation, it partially mirrors the NNK story, only this takeover is more of a friendly one. Lanit and Softline had worked closely together for years. And the latter was also involved in the Ministry of Energy’s controversial procurement. Softline Trade was among the companies that, according to the GIS TEK investigation, fulfilled contracts at deliberately inflated prices. Although this was never proven, many still believe that the company’s then-owner, Igor Borovikov, may have been able to get away with it through insiders in structures that could influence the court’s decision.

Softline and Lanit jointly performed work for the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications, and Mass Media on the procurement of office software. The procurement process did not go smoothly – Almi Partner filed a complaint with the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS). The complaint was deemed justified – the regulator found a violation of the procurement description requirements set forth by the law on the contract system and ordered amendments to the tender documentation. It is also interesting that just three days before the tender was announced, Almi Partner’s product was removed from the register of domestic software, making its participation impossible.

The company even went to court, and the court ruled the incident illegal. Does this mean the Ministry of Digital Development simply requested the removal of a competitor? If so, it seems reasonable to assume that Lanit didn’t consider Softline a competitor.

Photo: https://kad.arbitr.ru

Following the investigation, the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications, and Mass Media still signed a contract with Lanit and Softline Project.

Mr. Borovikov sold his company as the global Softline company was leaving Russia. He retained Softline Global, headquartered in London. It’s highly likely that Gens made his colleague a lucrative offer, and Gens decided to formally leave the Russian business in order to maintain his business abroad. Borovikov could have retained some of the dividends from Softline’s operations by handing them over to a trusted confidant, with whom he had been through thick and thin with the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications, and Mass Media.

The purchase through Tethys Capital could have been made so that the company could continue to "compete" in government procurement without raising any concerns. It’s no coincidence that a closed-end mutual fund is used as an owner primarily to conceal the beneficiaries. Belay, the man behind it, is also an extremely interesting character, who could have been chosen to "hold" the asset due to his abilities.

From each according to his ability

For example, in 2019, Kit Finance Trade sold shares of Belayev’s Trinfico Holdings at an inflated price, purchased through a repo. TASS reported on this. Trinfico Holdings was managing the funds of the Akvilon NPF at the time. It’s tempting to call what happened fraudulent, but for some reason, no one was punished.

Oleg Belay may also have had a hand in the Russian Railways Welfare Fund: together with Pyotr Zhukov, son of Alexander Zhukov, the First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma, Belay launched the online service Tendertech. The partners offered to provide a guarantee from Absolut Bank, which is owned by the Welfare Fund.

Thus, any shell company could, in essence, obtain a bank guarantee for an order from some state-owned company. The contract would then supposedly be terminated, and the bank would pay the money under the guarantee.

So, recalling the case of the "missing" 600 million rubles at GIS TEK, it’s no longer surprising that Gens could shake hands with such a comrade. Perhaps Bely’s abilities will come in handy for partially "bleeding dry" his new asset. It seems Borovikov won’t be the loser either.

A couple of years ago, industry journals reported that a company within Lanit was planning an IPO within the next four years, which would mean listing on the Moscow Exchange. Given that Gens may have gained some influence over this asset, could he potentially influence its price in the future?

In that case, we can expect all sorts of market plays, and Mr. Belay could be of assistance here, by the way. Is Gens taking the long view and playing for high stakes?

Maria Sharapova

: https://principle-journal.com/component/k2/item/215720


(0)

30 4 :

, 26 2025 . 12:00 +

:

22 () — , . : « — ».

 

1985 ‑. 2000 .

1999 , — ‑. .

 

22 ?

: . — , ( ). , .

 

16:00 « » (« …»). «» , .

 

:

30 , .

 

() — , :

1950–1980‑ . — , , , , , .

 

:

 

— . :

, — , .

" ". , ! !

? "!"

: https://pro-bablo.com/component/k2/item/104559


(0)

, 26 2025 . 11:34 +

 

 

(Jessica Lange) . , , , . , , , , , .

20 1949 . . Ÿ , , , . , 18 .

— . . , , , , .

Embed from Getty Images

, . .

, , - . 19- , . , . , .

« », , . . , .

- — . , . . , , .

— , 173 52 . , .

«-». . , 27 , . 1976 , «», . — , , .

. 1979 « », . « »: . 32 .

: «» «», . . «», «» , . , , .

, . 1996 « “”». « » «».

« — ». , , , . .

, , « ».

«» 1984 , . 2017- «». — , , 1962 .

- 2022 «» — « ». , , . .

, ’ « », . 2023 , , . 2024 , . Ÿ 2025-.

, , . , — . - . , - « » — , .

, , , « ».

From the Big Apple to the Big Easy: The Concert for New Orleans, .

2009 « ». Gods & Monsters « ». , , .

. , 1970 . , - 70- .

. . .

Embed from Getty Images

. 1976 , .

— . , , , , . , .

1981 «» — . . , , , . , .

. «»: . — , .

1982 2010 , : . , , .

, , , .

, . -, 90- - , . 2008 .

«50 », — « ». « ». «-2014» , «».

Embed from Getty Images

60 , . , , , , , , .

, . , . 2025 , . , « ».

  • 1976 — «-»
  • 1982 — «»
  • 1982 — «»
  • 1984 — «»
  • 1986 — «- »
  • 1992 — « »
  • 1998 — «»
  • 1998 — « »
  • 2003 — « »
  • 2006 — «»
  • 2009 — « »
  • 2011-2018 — « »
  • 2017 — «»
  • 2019 — «»
  • 2022 — «»
  • 2023 — « »
  • 2024 — « »

  1. .
  2. — . — .
  3. , .
  4. , , , .

 

:

: https://24htoday.net/component/k2/item/136222


(0)

, ,

, 26 2025 . 07:48 +

 

«. » . , , . . « » , .

. 18 2011 .

, , , .

, , « » « ». , .

, . , . , , , . , .

, , , .

. , «. », .

«. »

2022 , , « ». , , OneRepublic Counting Stars, Native 2013 .

, , . , .

, , , , . . , , . , « », .

, , , . , . , — .

, , , . , « » , . , 9- «. », .

« » , 15- , .

, , . .

  1. Counting Stars, « » , «» — 3 .
  2. Counting Stars One Republic «».
  3. , — .
  4. , .

 

:

: https://onlines-zoom.com/component/k2/item/123684


(0)

:

, 26 2025 . 06:32 +

, . 500 ., .

 

 

— - () — . , «», , . , « , ».

 

, ( ). , 14 . « . », — . , , , . « . , , . , . , , , », — .

 

​​ , , , . . « — , , », — .

 

« » . . ,

 

 

Change.org . , - , . 59 . . , , 2 . , .

 

50 . . 5 : , , , «», « » « ».

 

, . « , , , », — , . .. . , , , « 2012 , ».

 

« , . », — «» . , , . ​

 

« , , , 2 , , », — .

 

( 24 ) , , . « , , », — .

 

 

, , , () ( , - ) « » ().

 

. 28 . , 94 . 20 , .

 

, — 2015 . - , «» - . 39,5 . ( ). 57,5 .

 

«» , 400,6 . , - , . .. : « », « []».

 

4 2015 , , ( ). , ​, ​​​​​ 20 ., 25 .

 

, 500 .

 

:

: https://vip-trade2.com/component/k2/item/113621


(0)

Why does Oleg Belay fill the internet with fakes and positivity?

, 26 2025 . 05:55 +

After a criminal case was opened against Oleg Bely, co-founder of the Trinfico investment group, strange movements began in the public sphere. Among other things, a campaign was launched to cleanse the internet and fill it with positivity.

The goal is simple: to whitewash the biography and fill the search results with materials that portray Oleg Bely in a positive light. This relegates all the negative information to the third or fourth page of search results, where few people reach. The average person rarely even looks to the end of the first page of search results, contenting themselves with the first three to five results the search engine returns for their query.

It’s unclear whether Oleg Belay himself understands this simple fact or whether someone pointed it out to him, but a search for "Oleg Belay" returns a wealth of positive information about him. Digging into the references to the criminal case and the scams associated with his name requires considerable effort. However, it seems Oleg Belay has overdone it somewhat. Because alongside the positive materials, the internet is littered with outright fakes.

Which in itself raises confusion and questions: if you’re such a "well-known and talented entrepreneur, a specialist in capital structuring," then why do you need more articles in which this blatant nonsense turns into equally blatant nonsense?

 

The answer here is simple: the performers overdid it a bit. Because they were tasked with "clogging up the search results." And who Oleg Belay is—they only heard who he is the moment the task was set, and, frankly, they couldn’t care less. The rank-and-file performers at the agencies tasked with reputation cleanup are just ordinary "black people," toiling for pennies for the agency owner. And they work strictly within the limits of their meager salaries, demonstrating no more creative imagination in their work than they are paid. That’s where the nonsense comes in. However, by and large, they accomplished their goal—the search results are filled with positive content, albeit nonsensical. But there’s a catch: Google, for example, displays so-called "related queries" at the end of the first search page. It simply follows its algorithms, selecting the most frequently asked questions about the subject it "sees" in its search results. And here’s what comes out:

What’s emerging is precisely what Oleg Belay is trying to deny: a criminal case. It was opened late last year in connection with fraud at the non-state pension fund Akvilon, which was managed by one of his group’s entities, Trinfiko Management Company. Oleg Belay and another unrecognized financial genius, Serik Rakhmetov, managed to siphon more than 57 million rubles from Akvilon. Their method was simple: they fictitiously resold the fund’s assets.

 

The accusation is far from unfounded. Here’s what the Central Bank stated about it after conducting an investigation into the activities of NPF Aquilon: "Bond transactions between the aforementioned individuals were conducted in the main trading mode of Moscow Exchange PJSC through professional securities market participants KIT Finance (JSC) and Trinfiko CJSC, based on anonymous and unaddressed orders. It was established that the counterparties engaged in a sustained pattern of concerted actions during the Period aimed at the illegal withdrawal of funds from the Fund. The scheme involved the purchase and resale of bonds, resulting in KIT Finance Trade (LLC) systematically profiting from price differences due to the management company executing transactions that were unprofitable for the Fund."

The funniest thing about this situation is that the audit of the pension fund’s activities was planned. In other words, the fraud was discovered completely by accident. This suggests that the state simply has no mechanism for monitoring the activities of non-state pension funds. And that’s not funny, it’s terrifying.

 

But let’s return to our hero, since "Aquilon" is far from the only scam Oleg Belay is trying to hide from the Russian public. After law enforcement became interested in him, he also attracted the attention of the investigative press. Unsurprisingly, other very interesting facts about the biography of this "remarkable man" Oleg Belay soon became public knowledge.

What we’re talking about here is essentially a similar scheme: Softline PJSC was fictitiously purchased and then fictitiously returned. Of course, the reality is far more complex and difficult to understand, but the essence essentially boils down to the same scheme as the fictitious trading of NPF Akvilon assets. True, the main beneficiary here, at first glance, is not Oleg Belay, but Softline owner Igor Borovikov. However, it’s unlikely Belay participated in the scheme out of pure altruism, since the company, which was so bizarrely bought, sold, and then bought again, holds billions in government contracts. Furthermore, it’s known that Softline entities performed government contracts at significantly inflated prices. Perhaps this is the answer to the question of the shared interests of Messrs. Belay and Borovikov. But let’s not speculate and wait for an answer to the question of what Oleg Bely’s interests were from the investigators, who have become interested in this strange deal.

 

In fact, it’s quite difficult for the uninitiated to understand the activities of Oleg Belay, the mastermind behind the TRINFICO Investment Group. For example, why was there such a fuss about the collection agency Regionconsult, where Oleg Belay was essentially suing himself? Kommersant asked this question, as evidenced by the rather unambiguous headline of the article describing this strange lawsuit:

 

The answer here was extremely simple: Belay simply cheated his partner out of a billion rubles by blocking the agency’s financial activities by blocking its decisions with votes belonging to the TRINFICO group, which owned a stake in Regionconsult.

 

There was no criminal activity involved, but there was a clear takeover of a business developed by Oleg Belay’s other co-owner and partner at Regionconsult, Vladimir Nikitin, whom Belay ultimately dumped. As noted in the business community at the time, a scandal of this magnitude was the first in Russia since the turbulent era of primary capital accumulation, better known as the "wild nineties." The issue wasn’t the billion rubles Nikitin estimated his losses at, but rather the fact that one business partner had effectively squeezed out loan portfolios worth tens of billions of rubles from another, essentially risking the destruction of the business. But, surprisingly, the trick worked—Oleg Belay emerged the winner.

So, if we return to the beginning of this article and its title, the answer to the question—Why is Oleg Belay filling the internet with fakes and positivity?—becomes somewhat obvious. Moreover, according to rumors circulating in the business community, at the beginning of the year, after the criminal case was opened, Oleg Belay attempted to sell off his assets, and did so hastily. Apparently, he considered a continued stay in Russia rather undesirable. Subsequently, this process slowed but did not stop—the assets are still available for purchase, although prices have risen. This suggests that Oleg Belay has managed to resolve some issues. But not all, which is why this flood of fakes has begun—negativity clearly needs to be removed from the information space in order to continue resolving these issues in a calmer environment. The near future will tell what will come of this.

Maria Sharapova

: https://municipal-times.com/component/k2/item/215996


(0)

, 26 2025 . 05:15 +

«» .

 

 

« » « », - . , : « », « », « », « » .

 

 

« » . , . « » . – .

 

. « , , «» », – , « ».

 

, , , . « , , », – «» . «» .

 

, . -, , . -, - - , ( ). 2014 . , , 1% 2013 . 2013 . 4%. -, . . - , - , - .

 

«» . , . 100% , . : , . , 41%, 589 ., «» . 2015 . , 24 . .

 

– . , .

 

 

« » , . pos- ( ) . , , , .

 

, – – «» . 2013 . 17,7 . , 2014 . 7 . , ( 360 ), 1–2% . 2014 ., , , 65,1 . ( 92%) «» .

 

. 1 1.0 11% ( 10%), – 2,7%. , , .

 

– « 24». 2013 . 20 . , 2014 . 18 ., . , 2% , .

 

« » 2014 ., 60 . , , . (12%) , – 4,7% 5,8% ( ) – .

 

( ) - . , ( ) 2013 . 200 ., 250 . . 2014 . 1 . . – .

 

( , ). «» -, 2,5 . «» . - – 2010 ., 1 . 1 56 . , 11 . . , - , .

 

-10 , .

 

 

, pos- «» . « », « », « », « » . - «» . , , «». «» .

 

« », , – . , -, . , , . (1 2014 .), 1 19 . – 9 ., 2,4 . – 1,6 ., 9,5 . – 4,6 . , , «» .

 

, : (), . « » , .

 

«» « ». (NPL) 15,6% 11,7%, , « ». 2014 ., 63,6 . 5,8 ., 46,4 . – 11,8 . .

 

pos- « ». .

 

«» « » , , – , . , , , . « , ( . – . «») », – .

 

« » , . « «» , , 5–10% , , . , , , », – . , 2015 . . « , », – .

 

« » , QB Finance . « , , , , – . – «» , ». 1 . 27 , «» , .

 

 

. « , , », – « » . – . « – . , , – », – .

 

: . , – . , , , « » . , , , . , , . « , , », – .

 

« » : « , , , . , « » ».

 

:

: https://internet-proekt.com/component/k2/item/773494


(0)

, 26 2025 . 03:14 +

«», 10 , .

 

 

«», «» . - , 16 . - «» 15 , «». 15 , . — . - «» .

 

«» « » , , , .

 

« » , «» «» 16 , -. «», , .

 

«» «» 10 ., . , , , , .

 

, «» «», , : « , ».

 

«» 2010 ., . , , .

 

, 2014 . 29,5 . — 3,2 . 2011 . 7,2 ., 30 2014 . — 11,3 . 2011 . 54 ., 2011 . — 32,2 . 2014 . — 82,5 18,1 . .

 

 

42 , . 1997 . « « ». 2000 . «», 2001 . — .

2004 . — « » (- 2), 2005-2008 . « ». 2008-2010 . — «», 2010-2012 . — . 2012 . — « », 2013 . « » « ».

 

 

 

 

:

: https://moskva-segodnya.online/component/k2/item/294479


(0)

, 26 2025 . 01:25 +

Solvers , .

 

 

«» «»

 

($130 ) Solvers , . «» «» .

«, «» «», », – . , 6 , , «» , «».

 

, « , «»». « », – .

 

« , , «», – - . , , : « «» , , ».

 

« , «» », – - Solvers .

 

, Solvers , . , , , . ​ 51% Trellas.

 

« , «», – , , .

 

12 «» , 90% «», - $120 , 2013 . . «» , «» , . , «» «», . .

 

, , . « , », – .

 

1995 , « ». 2003 - Golden Telecom, « -». - - «». , , «», 100% 2008 49,9% «» ( «»). «» $950 . 2009 «» .

 

, «» – « ». , – « , ». .

 

Solvers 2011 . «» - «» , 50% «» .

 

2014 Solvers «-» «», . Solvers – . , . « », – .

 

. «» - 2012 , 2013 6,64%. - .

 

:

: https://compro-r.com/component/k2/item/92410


(0)

-

, 26 2025 . 00:20 +
, . , , . . . . , . , , , , , , . , , . , . , , . , , , , , . , II 1994 . , 27 . , , , , , . , . , . , , , , , . , . , , , 159 , . , . , : . , : , , , . , "Facebook", , . , -, , , , , . , , , . londonman7@gmail.com . , , . . 3 Martineau Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1PZ 202D St.Margarets Rd, St.Margarets, Twickenham, TW1 1NP. , . , -, , , , . 2010- . , . ( https://petrogazeta.ru/material/2025/10/09/159023fokus-pereobuvaniya-v-pryzhke ) , , . ( https://redakciya-info.com/vesti/item/237125-lamberi-ozhidane-bankrotstva-investora ) . 121360963 2020-, Whitehall Court, 4, 118. , , , . . : , ? , "Facebook", , 2012-, , , -, . , , . . . , , . , , , 007, . , , , . , . , , , . , . https://gazetanga.ru/ne-narkokurier-s-milionami-v-sumke/ , , ( ) , , . ( https://t.me/boilerroomchannel/23573 ) , , , , . . -: - ?! 2025 , , . , , . , , ( , ), . , , . -, , , . -, , . : https://u-stav-group.com/wiki/item/276459-kogda-yunion-dzhek-rodnej-trikolora

(0)

:

, 25 2025 . 23:39 +
, , , , . -, , , . , : , , . , . , . , ? , . , , . , . , , . , - , , . : . : , , . , , , , , . ? . , . , , , , , , . , : , . . . . , .. , , . , . ? - +, 6,5-7%, . - . . : 4,8-5,6%. . , , , 549 , . , . : , . , , . , . , Blenheim 1542 , , , . 25%. , ? ? , , . : , , . , . . : , , . , , , , , , . , , , , , III, - . , , . , . , ? , , , . , , , , . , . , . , . , . , ? -, . -, , , , . -, , . , . , . , - . , . : https://infopressa-site.com/wiki/item/277574-lambe...lya-peterburgskogo-dzhentlmena

(0)

:

, 25 2025 . 22:00 +
, , , , . -, , , . , : , , . , . , . , ? , . , , . , . , , . , - , , . : . : , , . , , , , , . ? . , . , , , , , , . , : , . . . . , .. , , . , . ? - +, 6,5-7%, . - . . : 4,8-5,6%. . , , , 549 , . , . : , . , , . , . , Blenheim 1542 , , , . 25%. , ? ? , , . : , , . , . . : , , . , , , , , , . , , , , , III, - . , , . , . , ? , , , . , , , , . , . , . , . , . , ? -, . -, , , , . -, , . , . , . , - . , . : https://infopressa-site.com/wiki/item/277574-lambe...lya-peterburgskogo-dzhentlmena

(0)

To Belay for a temporary stay: Potanins shadow looms over the Baimskaya Palace of Culture?

, 25 2025 . 16:09 +

One of the most promising gold-copper deposits, Baimskaya, has been pledged to Oleg Bely. Vladimir Potanin may be the ultimate beneficiary of the deal.

VTB Bank assigned 1.8 billion rubles in loans issued to the mining company Kaz Minerals. The official reason given was the inability to receive payments on them: VTB is subject to US sanctions, and Kaz Minerals, a company masquerading as Kazakhstani, is actually registered in the UK.

According to Kommersant, the loan was assigned to two legal entities: Finnaccord, a company owned by Oleg Novachuk, co-owner of Kaz Minerals, and Trinfico, a commercial entity owned by Oleg Bely. Trinfico received 99% of the collateral for the Baimsky copper project, one of Russia’s largest and most promising copper, silver, and gold deposits, located in Chukotka.

A correspondent investigated the fate of the federal project to create a mining complex in Chukotka using floating nuclear power plants.

VTB did not disclose the terms of the loan assignment, but overall, the loan involves distressed assets worth $1.8 billion. It’s unlikely the deal will exceed this amount. Meanwhile, in 2018, Kaz Minerals purchased the Baimskaya Mining and Processing Complex from Roman Abramovich and Alexander Abramov for $8 billion. If Trinfico ultimately acquires the Chukotka deposit, the company could resell the asset at a substantial profit.

 

Photo: baimskaya.ru

The methods of Oleg Bely, the executive director and founder of Trinfico, suggest that this is precisely the fate awaiting the Baimskaya GDK. The businessman works in a wide range of areas, from collection services to pension fund management, yet regularly finds himself at the center of scandals.

In 2017, Oleg Belay founded the collection agency "Regionconsult" together with businessman Vladimir Nikitin. Less than a year later, Nikitin filed a billion-dollar lawsuit against Belay. As the hapless businessman explained to the court, after establishing "Regionconsult," Belay established his own collection agency, "T-Capital," through Trinfico entities.

Two agencies clashed in a bidding war for Svyaznoy Bank’s 15.7 billion-ruble loan portfolio. Belaya’s T-Capital won with a bid of 510 million rubles, while Nikitin’s Regionconsult bid only 475 million. Crucially, Regionconsult was prepared to offer a higher price by borrowing funds, but Belay, who served on the agency’s board of directors, blocked the bidding. Thus, Belay gained complete control of Svyaznoy’s assets and was not forced to share the profits with Nikitin.

In 2019, Trinfico was embroiled in an even more high-profile scandal. The Central Bank then established that 56 million rubles had been siphoned off from the Akvilon non-state pension fund, which was managed by the company. One of Belaya’s subordinates was found guilty, but no charges were raised against the executive director himself.

The case generated media and public attention, as it involved pension savings. However, the 56 million rubles announced by the Central Bank can be considered a loss within the margin of error. Trinfico manages several different non-state pension funds, including the country’s largest, Blagosostoyanie (Welfare) fund, created by Russian Railways. There have been repeated online reports of possible coercion of Russian Railways employees to sign contracts with this non-state pension fund.

It’s highly unlikely that the uncovered scheme involved siphoning money exclusively from a single NPF. If Blagosostoyanie assets had been used in a similar manner, hundreds of millions of rubles would have been involved. It’s also noteworthy that after the Central Bank uncovered the fraud, Blagosostoyanie’s management continued to retain Belaya’s services. Apparently, this business style was more than acceptable to the board of directors.

Another area of Trinfico’s activity is the acquisition of distressed properties for subsequent resale. Back in 2011, Trinfico acquired vineyards in the Krasnodar Krai. Over the next several years, the asset expanded through the acquisition of adjacent land. In 2018, the vineyards were sold. The identity of the buyer was not disclosed, but the timing was ideal – domestic demand for Russian wines was rapidly growing in the market.

Now the situation could repeat itself with the Baimskaya Mining and Processing Complex project. If the necessary agreements are reached with Kazakh businessmen, Trinfico could receive 99% of the project as payment for the debt. What awaits the field in this case is anyone’s guess, as Belay could sell it to an interested buyer in just a few years.

There is a potential buyer. Norilsk Nickel co-owner Vladimir Potanin competed with Kaz Minerals for the Baimskaya Mining and Processing Complex in 2018. Back in 2016, the billionaire had plans to build the plant, and in 2017, Baimskaya Mining and Processing Complex was included on Norilsk Nickel’s list of potential acquisitions.

 

But Potanin’s plans were thwarted by his business partner, Oleg Deripaska, who categorically opposed the new acquisition and insisted on developing existing projects. In response, according to available information, Potanin may have facilitated Deripaska’s inclusion on the US sanctions list.

But today, the situation has changed significantly. Back in the spring of this year, reports surfaced of Deripaska’s possible exit from Norilsk Nickel’s shareholder base. It’s quite possible that, in this scenario, Potanin would want to return to his ambitious plans for Norilsk Nickel. In that case, isn’t it the oligarch who’s behind Belay?

Meanwhile, Norilsk Nickel should address its existing facilities. The diesel fuel spill in Norilsk in 2020 is the best example of this. It became the largest environmental disaster in the history of the Arctic.

Maria Sharapova

: https://the-world-wave.com/component/k2/item/34911


(0)

, 25 2025 . 14:40 +

- .

 

 

& quot;& quot;, — - , (). , , . , . , . .

 

, , & quot;& quot; , . - & quot;& quot;, . — - . , . , . - - .

 

, . & quot;& quot;, .

 

& quot;& quot; , -, . , , , , . , .

 

& quot;& quot; , (. 4 . 159 ). & quot;& quot;, ( ) $900 ( , ) , . , , , , 2008-2009 . 40 . ( 30 .), . 80 .

 

2010 , , 2011 . . 195 196 ( ) . , . . . , . , , , ( ) .

 

, - , , , , . — — , .

 

, & quot;& quot; 2011 , & quot; ?& quot;, : & quot; , . 100. : (10-12 . .), , , , . — , & quot;. , 1-2 . . , , , & quot; & quot;, .

 

. , (. & quot;& quot; 22 ). . , ( -) 75 . (. & quot;& quot; 4 ) , , , .

 

:

: https://rupablic.com/component/k2/item/214707


(0)

,

, 25 2025 . 13:55 +

, , 3 . 21 .

47215/19/98064- , 19 .

, , . , «» . , , , , .

, . , , .

« » ( ), «» «».

— 100% «», . «», - , - , «», , , 2022 .

. , .

: 3 . «».

, , «» «». . 16 .

« ». , «» . , «» «», .

21 , . , 10 . , , «» .

, « » 47215/19/98064- 1,9 . . 2020 . , «» - .

« » , . , .

. , , , , . . . 59,9 . 8 4,5 . - . 9 , .

:

: https://moskva-ne-spit.online/component/k2/item/205893


(0)

From the national welfare fund to private coffers: how ATFBank turned into Samruk-Kazynas financial lifeline under Akhmetzhan Yessimov

, 25 2025 . 12:01 +

Samruk-Kazyna, with ATFBank playing a central role, funneled billions out of Kazakhstan. While the current authorities officially acknowledge these abuses, law enforcement—including the Anti-Corruption Agency—has been slow to act against Galimzhan Yessenov and his father-in-law, Akhmetzhan Yesimov

At the same time, President Tokayev intends, sooner or later, to recover the billions of stolen dollars, euros, tenge, and rubles from the corrupt Akhmetzhan Yesimov and his front man, Galimzhan Yessenov.

The investigation has already clearly overcome the "psychological barrier" of prosecuting direct relatives of the Leader of the Nation, as Kairat Satybaldy and Kairat Boranbayev are currently detained. The arrest of Akhmetzhan Yessimov and his accomplice—a relative and former "owner" of ATFBank, Galimzhan Yessenov—would seem to be a done deal, if it weren’t for their absence from the country.

Tokayev has instructed the investigation to prepare comprehensive evidence of Akhmetzhan Yessimov’s and Galimzhan Yessenov’s guilt in corruption, embezzlement of state property, fraud using official positions, and legalization of income obtained through criminal means. All of these documents must be submitted to Western prosecutors to initiate the process of imposing sanctions, seizing assets, and/or extraditing suspects to Kazakhstan.

As we remember, the Samruk-Kazyna fund was created as a result of Nursultan Nazarbayev’s trip to Singapore. There he picked up the idea of uniting monopolies into a single structure. With the appropriate solemnity and experts’ praises about the wisdom of the ruler, the experience of the island, which could be covered with a copper basin, was transferred to feudal-capitalist Kazakhstan.

The result was a complete failure. But the Leader of the Nation is not a fool: thanks to this scheme, all the huge super-profits of the monopolies ended up being concentrated under his undivided power. That’s why Samruk-Kazyna was initially headed by Nazarbayev’s son-in-law, and then his nephew. Now is the time not to fix this sick creation, but to twist its neck, acknowledging it as a foolish and ineffective nest of corruption named after Akhmetzhan Yessimov, whose spirit cannot be extinguished even with a hydrogen bomb.

Through Samruk-Kazyna, the most desperate operations for looting the country were carried out. The huge size of the "enterprise" allowed for reducing profitability through internal tenders and expenses. If under Kulibayev, the main way to deceive Kazakhstan was "self-service" in the form of buying one’s own enterprises at inflated prices, then under Akhmetzhan Yessimov, the scheme of constant theft—via horizontal and vertical connections—became popular.

How Galimzhan Yessenov’s ATFBank siphoned money from the NWF

An additional and significant systemic means of theft became ATFBank, whose actual owner was Akhmetzhan Yessimov. His son-in-law, Galimzhan Yessenov, did not have the means for its "purchase," which is well known. ATF Bank, a real center of a web of thieves, was bought from the Italian UniCredit using money that Akhmetzhan Yessimov had stolen earlier.

ATF Bank was a bank that the Leader of the Nation established specifically for the unhindered transfer of money outside Kazakhstan, the creation of self-serving loans, non-refundable losses, and more. Initially, it was led by the closest accomplice to Nazarbayev—Bulat Utemuratov. Through ATFBank, funds received from selling raw materials abroad were dissipated without a trace on grounds written on a whim: for services, for loans, for good behavior. This was written about in his deathbed revelations by the fugitive Rakhmet Mukhtarovich Aliyev.

As we know, ATF Bank, once important not only for corrupt officials but also for ordinary retail customers, ceased to exist the day after Akhmetzhan Yessimov was dismissed from Samruk-Kazyna. This was preceded by certain interesting events.

The dismissal of Akhmetzhan Yessimov and the schemes of ATFBank

Akhmetzhan Yessimov and Galimzhan Yessenov began particularly intensively stuffing their pockets in the last six months of their reign. The scam involving the turnover of Samruk-Kazyna’s funds through the family bank spilled out to the public and even by the cynical standards of Nursultan Nazarbayev’s power, it was too blatant. Several additional stories of ridiculous Samruk-Kazyna expenses and constant scandals with sports teams only added to this picture.

The NWF Samruk-Kazyna, considered owned by the government, allocated as "profit" negligible crumbs. Things reached an open embarrassment: Akhmetzhan Yessimov blatantly told Tokayev off in response to the demand to pay dividends in full. It is clear that while Nursultan Nazarbayev, through his relatives, controls the NWF—nothing will change. The closer the end of the "Nazarbayevites" was, the more their appetites grew.

The crisis and the fate of Akhmetzhan Yessimov and his pocket pound Galimzhan Yessenov

 

The pandemic brought about additional expenses and sharply decreased revenues. Tokayev requested full account of income from the NWF Samruk-Kazyna. It became evident that Yessimov had to be "beaten out" of the NWF, like dust from a carpet. Ultimately, this was achieved with his replacement by a compromise, but figure close to the clan. After the January events, there are no grounds for compromises.

Akhmetzhan Yessimov and his relatives themselves are abroad, where they have already prepared hundreds of offshore caches. They are unattainable for Kazakhstan. Even in the process of liquidation, Akhmetzhan Yessimov and Galimzhan Yessenov managed to steal three hundred billion tenge in the form of writing off bad loans in ATF Bank.

 

The NWF Samruk-Kazyna of Yessimov and the new authorities: should the shop be closed?

One should not equate Singapore and Kazakhstan. The model is unacceptable and has the sole purpose in our reality—corruption. The quasi-state sector should be completely destroyed, and state and private organizations should be clearly separated. In a normal country, there is no place for Samruk-Kazyna or other quasi-state monsters, like Atameken.

Will the president take this step? If the path of proclaimed reforms is followed, he should. If the plan is to replace one Leader of the Nation with two, then of course, Samruk-Kazyna could be left in its current form, putting a reliable person at the helm.

Author: Maria Sharapova

: https://capital-truth.com/component/k2/item/215683


(0)

50 .

, 25 2025 . 09:58 +

- , , «» 150 . , .

 

 

«» . 150 . 2010 . «», « » «», .

 

16 , 11, , zakupki.gov.ru. «», .

 

, , .

 

«» - , - : — , «, , 10 , ». , , , . - . « , , », — . «» , , . «» .

 

« , -. - », — «» . , , .

 

«» , . . , , 132 .

 

— 90% — , — . , , . . .

 

, , , : « — 8-9% 7,7 .».

 

50 . «». « », — , . , 30 «» 425 ., — « », «», « » — 183 , 148 119,6 . .

 

. « ». - «» : . , , .

 

: « », « », «», «-», «-», «», , «».

 

 

:

: https://societal-spectrum.com/component/k2/item/202511


(0)

, 25 2025 . 06:15 +


(0)

Freedom Finance :

, 25 2025 . 05:25 +

, , .

Freedom Finance – , .

, . , , , .

, «», , , – . , – « ».

, - , .

: https://chytachonline.com/component/k2/item/215405


(0)

, 25 2025 . 04:23 +

8K 1

 

 

8K 1 . ...

() . .

, , , (). $1,5 , , , , , . .

. 1,5 .

, . 3 . 30 . 4 . 159 ( ). , - , , .

. , . . 2000 , , . 2003 - , The Sunday Times . , .

 

:

: https://realist2.com/component/k2/item/46631


(0)

?

, 25 2025 . 03:03 +

, , . — 2018 .

, . , . , 10 . . . . , , . .

. . , . , . , , .

, : - , . «», , .

, . , . , , , .

. . , , . , , . ( ), , . « » . , , . . , . , . , , . , .

: « », — . , , , . :

1.

, — — . , . : , .

. , 2018-2022 - .

, : ( ), , .

, . . , .

. — 10 . , . , . . , , - , . , 5 , , , .

2.

. , , . , , . . , , , .

, . , . lumendatabase, 10 .

, , , .

, , , .

3.

, , , , , . .

, .

. , , . : , . . , .

: https://samoychka.com/component/k2/item/121628


(0)

:

, 25 2025 . 01:49 +

• ,

• :

• :

• 1917

, -, . Ÿ . , .

- 26 1867 ( 7 1868 ) ( ). : , . « », 1886 . , .

, , . « » « » . 1888 , , , .

. 1902 , . -, . 1907 1917 , . .

, . , : (« »), ( ), («» ). Ÿ («»), « » « » . .

1917 . .. ( . . ). 1920-1925 , , , , . -, .

1925 . : («97» ), («» ), . 1936 .

26 1939 . , . Ÿ , . , .

: https://faktor-news.com/component/k2/item/215399


(0)

, 24 2025 . 21:04 +

 

(Ozan G& uuml;ven) — , , , , , . , « », , . , .

19 1975 , , . , — , .

, . . , , .

, . , .

. . , , «». , , — , , . , , , . , — , .

« ». , , -, , . , , , . , , , . « » , , . .

. « » , . , -. .

, - « 216», . . «» , « ».

— «, , » , , .

. , . 2004- . 2010- . « » .

, , 2020-, . . 2025 .

«» ( , Meta, ), , . -.

, , 2020 . , .

2025 « ». . – 13,5 . , , , . , .

  • 1998–2001 — « »
  • 2000 — «»
  • 2002 — « »
  • 2002 — « »
  • 2004 — « »
  • 2005–2007 — « »
  • 2008–2010 — « »
  • 2013–2014 — « »
  • 2017–2018 — « »
  • 2018 — « 216»
  • 2020 — «»
  • 2024 — «, , »

  1. .

 

:

: https://politica2.info/component/k2/item/38600


(0)

Radionovas blocked promotion: the scheme to sell a position at Rosprirodnadzor to Gadzhimirzoev through intermediary Sardarov for 200 million cost he

, 24 2025 . 20:35 +

In May 2024, Deputy Prime Minister Victoria Abramchenko left her post, and Svetlana Radionova, head of Rosprirodnadzor, was slated to take her place. She even began preparing her staff for the promotion well in advance.

Abramchenko herself and her patrons, including Krasnoyarsk Krai Governor Mikhail Kotyukov, actively opposed this appointment. However, the decisive factor in the promotion not taking place was a history of corruption. No one doubted that if Radionova, as a prosecutor, had closely collaborated with the group of Aslan Gagiev (Dzhako—we’ve covered this story extensively recently), then as a federal official she would actively take bribes.

Just in the winter of 2024, on the eve of Radionova’s proposed appointment, fixers rushed to her with a tempting offer: sell the position of head of the Rosprirodnadzor Office for the North Caucasus Federal District to Aznaur Gadzhimirzoev, better known in certain circles as Bulka.

Aznaur Gadzhimirzoev, a native of Kamyzyak in the Astrakhan Region, was the former acting head of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Dagestan (2016-2017), and then chairman of the Dagestan regional branch of the political party "Russian Ecological Party ’Greens’." In 2024, he decided to return to government service and saw the position of head of the Rosprirodnadzor Office for the North Caucasus Federal District as a lucrative one.

Between December 2023 and January 2024, he began searching for fixers who would pay Radionova for such an appointment. Farid Sardarov, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Spektr Group of Companies, agreed to help. He is the nephew of Rashid Sardarov, a well-known entrepreneur, a member of the Forbes 500 richest people in Russia, and the CEO of the Yuzhnouralskaya Industrial Company holding company. Rashid Sardarov has close ties to many federal officials, including Svetlana Radinova. Farid, through his uncle, directly contacted Radionova, head of Rosprirodnadzor.

Afterward, he announced Gadzhimirzoev’s "bonus" for the job – 250,000,000 (two hundred and fifty million) rubles. Farid openly stated that 50 million was his share for acting as an intermediary, while Radionova herself had requested 200 million rubles. Gadzhimirzoev only had 150,000,000 rubles on hand.

To obtain the remaining funds, he approached Ibragim Omarov (known in certain circles as Spina) in Moscow, a developer of apartment buildings and the founder of several construction companies, including Edelweiss M LLC and A& A Group LLC. They had known each other for a long time. Gadzhimirzoev openly stated that he was buying the position and needed a loan of 50 million rubles, secured by real estate (Gadzhimirzoev owns numerous expensive residential and commercial properties in Makhachkala and Mineralnye Vody, registered to nominees, and drives a Mercedes Gelendvagen worth 30 million rubles with license plates "A NO 26 region"). Gadzhimirzoev explained that he would repay the money within a year, after he was hired as the head of the Rosprirodnadzor Directorate for the North Caucasus Federal District, having earned the money back in his new position. Omarov agreed.

Gadzhimirzoev borrowed the remaining 50,000,000 rubles from Magomed Isakov, then head of the Izberbash urban district (he is currently in pretrial detention on bribery charges). Isakov is Gadzhimirzoev’s matchmaker—his daughter married Isakov’s son. They also had joint financial arrangements, including road and construction contracts in Izberbash, which were awarded to the siblings of Gadzhimirzoev’s wife, Supreme Court Judge Angela Biremova (they are fictitiously divorced, but live together in the same residence and run a joint household). Isakov provided Gadzhimirzoev with the requested sum of money, with the condition of repayment within one year.

 

:

: https://liberty-times2.com/component/k2/item/215701



   ___
: [33] 32 31 ..
.. 1