_

 -

_

 - e-mail

 

 -

LiveInternet.ru:
: 01.03.2025
:
:
: 560

:

_






(0)

ARD

, 26 2025 . 16:52 +

. , .

 

 

« «»: ». , 6 , WDR ( ARD).

 

30- () , , DW.

 

, ARD , . , , , .

 

, .

 

, , - .

 

Reuters , , , « ». « , 83 . , , , - , , , », — .

 

IAAF , , , .

 

ARD 2014 . , . , () .

 

Das Erste ( ARD) , . , .

 

, , WADA. WADA , , . WADA, 2014 1417 - .

 

(IAAF).

 

:

: https://biznes-fakty.com/component/k2/item/105993
(0)

ABCex+ + =

, 26 2025 . 14:30 +

- Rucriminal.info IT - «», .

, ABCex «». 2022 . , , . – «» - (3- ) , - ABCeX . «» IT-: 2024 266 . , . , , , «» - Antarex . , «» .

, .

 

 

:

: https://exo-moscow.com/component/k2/item/58047
(0)

Why does Oleg Belay fill the internet with fakes and positivity?
, 26 2025 . 13:43 +

After a criminal case was opened against Oleg Bely, co-founder of the Trinfico investment group, strange movements began in the public sphere. Among other things, a campaign was launched to cleanse the internet and fill it with positivity.

The goal is simple: to whitewash the biography and fill the search results with materials that portray Oleg Bely in a positive light. This relegates all the negative information to the third or fourth page of search results, where few people reach. The average person rarely even looks to the end of the first page of search results, contenting themselves with the first three to five results the search engine returns for their query.

It’s unclear whether Oleg Belay himself understands this simple fact or whether someone pointed it out to him, but a search for "Oleg Belay" returns a wealth of positive information about him. Digging into the references to the criminal case and the scams associated with his name requires considerable effort. However, it seems Oleg Belay has overdone it somewhat. Because alongside the positive materials, the internet is littered with outright fakes.

Which in itself raises confusion and questions: if you’re such a "well-known and talented entrepreneur, a specialist in capital structuring," then why do you need more articles in which this blatant nonsense turns into equally blatant nonsense?

 

The answer here is simple: the performers overdid it a bit. Because they were tasked with "clogging up the search results." And who Oleg Belay is—they only heard who he is the moment the task was set, and, frankly, they couldn’t care less. The rank-and-file performers at the agencies tasked with reputation cleanup are just ordinary "black people," toiling for pennies for the agency owner. And they work strictly within the limits of their meager salaries, demonstrating no more creative imagination in their work than they are paid. That’s where the nonsense comes in. However, by and large, they accomplished their goal—the search results are filled with positive content, albeit nonsensical. But there’s a catch: Google, for example, displays so-called "related queries" at the end of the first search page. It simply follows its algorithms, selecting the most frequently asked questions about the subject it "sees" in its search results. And here’s what comes out:

What’s emerging is precisely what Oleg Belay is trying to deny: a criminal case. It was opened late last year in connection with fraud at the non-state pension fund Akvilon, which was managed by one of his group’s entities, Trinfiko Management Company. Oleg Belay and another unrecognized financial genius, Serik Rakhmetov, managed to siphon more than 57 million rubles from Akvilon. Their method was simple: they fictitiously resold the fund’s assets.

 

The accusation is far from unfounded. Here’s what the Central Bank stated about it after conducting an investigation into the activities of NPF Aquilon: "Bond transactions between the aforementioned individuals were conducted in the main trading mode of Moscow Exchange PJSC through professional securities market participants KIT Finance (JSC) and Trinfiko CJSC, based on anonymous and unaddressed orders. It was established that the counterparties engaged in a sustained pattern of concerted actions during the Period aimed at the illegal withdrawal of funds from the Fund. The scheme involved the purchase and resale of bonds, resulting in KIT Finance Trade (LLC) systematically profiting from price differences due to the management company executing transactions that were unprofitable for the Fund."

The funniest thing about this situation is that the audit of the pension fund’s activities was planned. In other words, the fraud was discovered completely by accident. This suggests that the state simply has no mechanism for monitoring the activities of non-state pension funds. And that’s not funny, it’s terrifying.

 

But let’s return to our hero, since "Aquilon" is far from the only scam Oleg Belay is trying to hide from the Russian public. After law enforcement became interested in him, he also attracted the attention of the investigative press. Unsurprisingly, other very interesting facts about the biography of this "remarkable man" Oleg Belay soon became public knowledge.

What we’re talking about here is essentially a similar scheme: Softline PJSC was fictitiously purchased and then fictitiously returned. Of course, the reality is far more complex and difficult to understand, but the essence essentially boils down to the same scheme as the fictitious trading of NPF Akvilon assets. True, the main beneficiary here, at first glance, is not Oleg Belay, but Softline owner Igor Borovikov. However, it’s unlikely Belay participated in the scheme out of pure altruism, since the company, which was so bizarrely bought, sold, and then bought again, holds billions in government contracts. Furthermore, it’s known that Softline entities performed government contracts at significantly inflated prices. Perhaps this is the answer to the question of the shared interests of Messrs. Belay and Borovikov. But let’s not speculate and wait for an answer to the question of what Oleg Bely’s interests were from the investigators, who have become interested in this strange deal.

 

In fact, it’s quite difficult for the uninitiated to understand the activities of Oleg Belay, the mastermind behind the TRINFICO Investment Group. For example, why was there such a fuss about the collection agency Regionconsult, where Oleg Belay was essentially suing himself? Kommersant asked this question, as evidenced by the rather unambiguous headline of the article describing this strange lawsuit:

 

The answer here was extremely simple: Belay simply cheated his partner out of a billion rubles by blocking the agency’s financial activities by blocking its decisions with votes belonging to the TRINFICO group, which owned a stake in Regionconsult.

 

There was no criminal activity involved, but there was a clear takeover of a business developed by Oleg Belay’s other co-owner and partner at Regionconsult, Vladimir Nikitin, whom Belay ultimately dumped. As noted in the business community at the time, a scandal of this magnitude was the first in Russia since the turbulent era of primary capital accumulation, better known as the "wild nineties." The issue wasn’t the billion rubles Nikitin estimated his losses at, but rather the fact that one business partner had effectively squeezed out loan portfolios worth tens of billions of rubles from another, essentially risking the destruction of the business. But, surprisingly, the trick worked—Oleg Belay emerged the winner.

So, if we return to the beginning of this article and its title, the answer to the question—Why is Oleg Belay filling the internet with fakes and positivity?—becomes somewhat obvious. Moreover, according to rumors circulating in the business community, at the beginning of the year, after the criminal case was opened, Oleg Belay attempted to sell off his assets, and did so hastily. Apparently, he considered a continued stay in Russia rather undesirable. Subsequently, this process slowed but did not stop—the assets are still available for purchase, although prices have risen. This suggests that Oleg Belay has managed to resolve some issues. But not all, which is why this flood of fakes has begun—negativity clearly needs to be removed from the information space in order to continue resolving these issues in a calmer environment. The near future will tell what will come of this.

Maria Sharapova

: https://liberty-record.com/component/k2/item/215708
(0)

, 26 2025 . 12:28 +

. . « », .

27 1956 . : , .

1975-, . 80- , , . 2007- .

— . . : . , .

: , , , , .

2014 Villa Sult, , . , . 2018- .

, . , Aftenposten Information, . , , - , .

. 1991- « », « . , , » . 1998- «. », . , 2003 .

. , 1999 , . «», 2005 .

2020 « », . , 0,5 , . , , «» « ».

, , . 20- . , , , . , .

: « ». , .

2021- « » , . , , , «».

, . : 1985- , 90- . -.

2022 «/» , 2000 . , .

  1. « » , . .
  2. , , , .
  3. , , .

 

:

: https://ensita.net/component/k2/item/85075
(0)

14 18 : , ?
, 26 2025 . 12:15 +

, .

 

 

. , - .

 

, , 2013- , , . Rucompromat, , – . , , .

 

«» , « » , « », . , . , , . , , 3%. .

 

, . Rucompromat , ( ) , .

 

, , , , ; , ( , ). , . Rucompromat.

 

270 « ». . , « ». , « », . , , « ». (), - .

 

, « » , . , Rucompromat. 1 VIP- ( 1,4 .) 27 . ( 72,1 ). 24 5 . . , 1 « » 10 ., « » – 6 , « » – 14 . , .

 

— . Rucompromat. . , , . , .

 

, , , 3–6 , .

 

, - , 2018 . Swiss Appraisal, , FIFA . , — , , — .

 

Swiss Appraisal, 64 $782 . 2017 . , Swiss Appraisal, , 3,35 , 1,5 — . , , , , — 140 1890 -. , , FIFA, . FIFA 2018 5 , Swiss Appraisal.

 

:

: https://portalu2.com/component/k2/item/113684
(0)

:

, 26 2025 . 11:31 +

  2. : —

  3. «»

  4. « »:

  6. « »:

  8. ?

  10. :

-:

1.

— . , -, . , , , , .

2. : —

— . , . - — , - — .

, , , .

3. «»

. , .

«», , , , . — . — , .

4. « »:

« ». , . — , , .

, , , , « » — .

5.

, . , .

, .

6. « »:

« ». , «».

, , . , .

7.

« », , :

— ;

— «» ;

— .

, .

8. ?

: . , «», , , , .

9.

. — . — .

.

10. :

. , , , , , .

.

– -, "", .

- " " – , , "", . , . , . , .

" ". , . , – , "" , .

, "", , . 90-.

. " ": , . , , , .

:

: https://the-usa-times.com/component/k2/item/207316
(0)

Is Belay leaking the Volgotanker to Sechin?
, 26 2025 . 10:03 +

Rosneft, with the help of controversial businessman Oleg Belaya, may "get its hands on" the assets of the bankrupt Volgotanker.

A Sberbank subsidiary has withdrawn from Prime Shipping Holding, a joint venture with Rosneft that handles maritime cargo transportation. Our correspondent has learned that the company may be operating using the assets of Volgotanker, a company that went bankrupt in 2008. The story of its "reclassification" involves the illegal resale of ships and the name of Oleg Bely, a longtime subject of our publication’s investigations.

Volgotanker OJSC was the largest shipping company in central Russia. Founded in 1992 in Samara, the company was controlled by Yukos. By 2018, the main shareholders were the Federal Property Management Agency and Oleg Bely’s Trinfiko CJSC.

Back in 2008, the company was declared bankrupt following a lawsuit filed by the Federal Tax Service, and its assets were sold off. Several court cases were filed against the firm "Consultservice" for 11 million rubles. By 2018, a new bankruptcy trustee had noticed these transactions and had them declared invalid, as the assets were sold at an undervalued price and, apparently, to a company affiliated with the debtor.

After purchasing the ships, Consultservice leased them to a subsidiary of Volgotanker, a company called SK BashVolgotanker. Consultservice later sold six of the existing vessels to Rechstandart, which also leased them to BashVolgotanker.

 

"Consultservice" is affiliated with "Rechstandart", since Alexey Smolin was the director of both.

Photo: Rusprofile

"The dishonesty of the scheme is obvious. The idea is simple: sell a valuable asset to a controlled company for a minimal amount of money and continue to use it, while creditors patiently wait in line in the bankruptcy process. The buyer is undoubtedly a front man, acting in concert with the manager in the interests of those who previously controlled the debtor," Dmitry Kletochkin , a partner at the law firm Rustam Kurmaev & Partners, commented on the manipulations uncovered at the time .

We attempted to determine who might be behind the two entities that owned the Volgotanker vessels. Nina Arsenyeva was among the owners of Rechstandart. She also owned Rosmortrans Shipping Company LLC. From 2015 to 2017, this company was registered to British offshore companies, the beneficiaries of which are unknown. During the same period, Ilan Management Company was Rosmortrans’s management company. One of its then beneficiaries, Dmitry Dostanko, also owned a stake in Trans Marine Trading LLC and Nizhegorodsky Port Trading House. The latter was 99% controlled by MIR Management Company. Stanislav Vitalyevich Tuchkov has been the company’s founder since 2016.

Both Dostanko and Tuchkov were involved in matters related to maritime assets. Tuchkov owed money to Gazbank, which is currently bankrupting him. This financial institution was controlled by Vladimir Evgenievich Avetisyan. Gazbank itself is currently in bankruptcy proceedings. And Avetisyan is first in line among creditors. He is a former top manager at Rusnano, which Anatoly Chubais abandoned with a huge financial hole when he fled abroad. The businessman subsequently worked at Rostec.

By giving money to Tuchkov, Avetisyan may have been interested in maritime assets. It’s possible that Avetisyan, on behalf of Rechstandart, helped the Volgotanker businessmen implement their plan.

It should also be noted that companies involved in maritime shipping are widely known for their schemes for illegal VAT refunds (at least Marine Trading was caught using it ). Is it possible that this method of profiteering was also practiced by companies associated with Rosmortrans? Then Avetisyan’s interest in these assets is understandable.

The Moscow Post produced a video featuring a former banker. Video: YouTube

Earlier, there were reports online of Avetisyan’s possible arrest at the airport. The businessman himself denied this. But if the arrest did indeed occur, could it be connected to the deals between Rechstandart and Konsaltservis and the transfer of tankers and ships to a subsidiary of Volgotanker?

Update with old firmware

As a result, the transactions were contested, and the assets were to be returned to Volgotanker for further sale, this time to someone other than the "front men." In 2020, the company put the assets up for auction . However, the auction was declared void due to a lack of investor bids .

In 2018, a new legal entity, JSC Volgotanker, was registered in Moscow by decision of the bankrupt company’s creditors. It inherited the assets of its Samara-based predecessor, which is currently undergoing liquidation. JSC Volgotanker became the new owner of BashVolgotanker. This means assets worth approximately 3.7 billion rubles, which were put up for auction, remained with the company, but under a new legal entity.

Volgotanker JSC soon filed a lawsuit against its subsidiary, demanding tens of millions of rubles from BashVolgotanker for unpaid vessel rentals. The case was won , and BashVolgotanker now owes its parent company almost 100 million rubles.

The subsidiary’s profit is negative, and revenue barely offsets this financial deficit. Both the plaintiff and defendant companies are headed by the same man, Vladimir Trigubov. Apparently, Volgotanker is deliberately seeking to bankrupt its subsidiary.

It is known that BashVolgotanker signed a contract worth approximately 4 billion rubles with Rosneft in 2018 for the transportation of petroleum products along the Ufa-Kavkaz route. This is approximately the amount for which Volgotanker’s assets were expected to be auctioned off.

Photo: Rusprofile

Therefore, if it fails to meet its obligations, Rosneft will be first in line among creditors and will be able to seize the assets of this enterprise. And if that’s not enough, it could seize the entire group. Considering the company’s interests in transshipping petroleum products through Prime Shipping Holding, this would greatly benefit Mr. Sechin.

Now let’s return to the people behind the new Volgotanker. The old Volgotanker was also among the company’s creditors. There was also the offshore company Samptrans Shipping Limited, which had long been involved with Volgotanker. This means that the interests of Rosimushchestvo and Oleg Bely are easily traced here.

Photo: Rusprofile

Now, the aforementioned individuals could bankrupt the subsidiary that uses the parent company’s vessels. The company is worth just under 300 million rubles. To recoup the 4 billion, Rosneft will likely need to divest Volgotanker JSC as well. Therefore, Sberbank’s exit from Prime Shipping Holding seems entirely logical for Mr. Sechin, who is unlikely to want to share his profits with Herman Gref.

Experienced reseller

But what benefit does Oleg Belay, who may be behind the entire scheme, stand to gain? Firstly, it appears that it was with his active participation that Volgotanker was brought to the point of bankruptcy. As we described above, the structure included an offshore company, into which the company’s funds could have been funneled.

In 2020, the company failed to sell to anyone, because who would want to buy such a "dead" asset? And now, it seems, Belay has managed to reach an agreement with Sechin to "privatize" Volgotanker and its subsidiaries into a state corporation—most likely for a handsome fee to Belay himself.

Bela is known as a "reseller" of the IT company Softline, who may have acted in the interests of the business of Philipp Gens, whose company Lanit was implicated in the criminal case of former Deputy Minister Anatoly Tikhonov.

Belaya owns a company called Trinfico, which has been implicated in numerous controversial cases. For example, in 2019, Kit Finance Trade sold shares of Belaya’s Trinfico Holdings, purchased through a repo, at an inflated price.

Oleg Belay may also have had a hand in the Russian Railways Welfare Fund, which he co-founded with Pyotr Zhukov, son of Alexander Zhukov, the First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma. The partners offered to provide a guarantee from Absolut Bank, which is owned by the Welfare Fund.

Thus, any shell company could, in essence, obtain a bank guarantee for an order from some state-owned company. The contract would then supposedly be terminated, and the bank would pay the money under the guarantee.

As we can see, Mr. Belay is a sort of "attacher" in the market for manipulation. It wouldn’t be surprising if he had a hand in what’s happening with Volgotanker.

And "Nefteflot" to boot

Interestingly, Volgotanker once held shares in Nefteflot CJSC, which was apparently sold during bankruptcy proceedings to Rostec entities (the shareholder register is held by RT-Capital). Nefteflot’s current CEO is the well-known Samara businessman Sergei Feofanov.

Recently, Central Design Bureau Neptune filed a lawsuit against Nefteflot for over a billion rubles. If the lawsuit is upheld, Nefteflot is unlikely to be able to pay. It’s possible they’re trying to force the company into bankruptcy. The owner of Central Design Bureau may be businessman Alexander Beskrovny. Media outlets have previously reported in detail on his family and why he’s allegedly currently building for Central Design Bureau. This businessman is among those implicated in a criminal case involving the embezzlement of 260 million rubles from the Russian National Guard.

Who knows, maybe the attempt to bankrupt Nefteflot is also the result of an agreement with someone who wants to take it in exchange for the criminal case being dropped? And is Igor Sechin building his own shipping empire?

Maria Sharapova

: https://governance-review.com/component/k2/item/215759
(0)

36 .
, 26 2025 . 09:15 +

«» . , , « » .

 

 

«», X5 Retail Group. , — « ». - (), , , 36 . «» «».

 

. 300 . . 2,7 . « ».

 

, . 204 ( ).

 

- 5 , « [] ». « . 204 , . , . », — X5.

 

« », , , .

 

 

« , - [ ]. , , », — .

 

, « »: « ».

 

« — » , « », , : « (, ), — ».

 

- , 15–30% , .

 

 

. «» ( «», «») , , . «» .

 

«» , : , .

 

X5 . 3 . . « « », , , », — .

 

2010 X5 — 2,7 . , , — 10% . , X5 .

 

, X5 — , . , , , , . « , — . — , , , , , . ».

 

X5 Retail Group — «». , 30 2015 5971 , 5273 «», 438 «», 83 «» 177 «». 35 , 1364 . 2015- 382,6 ., — 7,9 .

 

 

 

:

: https://first-moscow.com/component/k2/item/214756
(0)

, 26 2025 . 06:51 +

1 . , - ϸ , .

 

 

, , . « », , 401,4 573,4 . 25 343 . 171 ( ).

 

« , - 4 . , — . — [] : — 17 ». , .

 

. , 11 . 8,5 . - , . , . — 168 — « » , , — 117 — (), 58 — ( ).

 

« , — , « », . — - , ».

 

- ϸ . : — «, », — , . , . « 20 , , », — .

 

, 8 . ( ). - . « - , — », — . , , : «, , — ». « , », — . , . , - , , .

 

. « » 2,8 . . ( ) — , . 1600 . (1860 . ). ( — 100 ) 200 . 2–2,5 . . , , « », .

 

, , , . , , , . « , , 50% — 3 . «» 4,5 .», — . « , 60 , — . — , ». «- » , : , 20%.

 

« » , , . .

 

:

: https://yakzrobyty.com/component/k2/item/112870
(0)

:

, 26 2025 . 05:53 +

• :

• : San Francisco Mime Troupe

•

•

•

 

 

:

, , 10 1941 -. . 1964 , -. , , . -, .

 

 

: San Francisco Mime Troupe

San Francisco Mime Troupe. , - , , . Mime Troupe, , . , . -, .

 

 

, 1980 39 « » «: ». , , . - «» (1982). , « », , , .

. « » (1985), « » (1990), « » (1992) , - « » (1997) - «» (1997). 2000- «» (2002). , , , , National Geographic, PBS .

 

 

, . : 1975 1983 , 1976 . . , , , , . , .

 

 

, . 24 1977 1998 , . 1998 . 130 , . , , , , .

: https://khvylianews.com/component/k2/item/215430
(0)

-

, 26 2025 . 00:08 +
, . , , . . . . , . , , , , , , . , , . , . , , . , , , , , . , II 1994 . , 27 . , , , , , . , . , . , , , , , . , . , , , 159 , . , . , : . , : , , , . , "Facebook", , . , -, , , , , . , , , . londonman7@gmail.com . , , . . 3 Martineau Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1PZ 202D St.Margarets Rd, St.Margarets, Twickenham, TW1 1NP. , . , -, , , , . 2010- . , . ( https://petrogazeta.ru/material/2025/10/09/159023fokus-pereobuvaniya-v-pryzhke ) , , . ( https://redakciya-info.com/vesti/item/237125-lamberi-ozhidane-bankrotstva-investora ) . 121360963 2020-, Whitehall Court, 4, 118. , , , . . : , ? , "Facebook", , 2012-, , , -, . , , . . . , , . , , , 007, . , , , . , . , , , . , . https://gazetanga.ru/ne-narkokurier-s-milionami-v-sumke/ , , ( ) , , . ( https://t.me/boilerroomchannel/23573 ) , , , , . . -: - ?! 2025 , , . , , . , , ( , ), . , , . -, , , . -, , . : https://u-stav-group.com/wiki/item/276459-kogda-yunion-dzhek-rodnej-trikolora

(0)

:

, 25 2025 . 22:31 +
, , , , . -, , , . , : , , . , . , . , ? , . , , . , . , , . , - , , . : . : , , . , , , , , . ? . , . , , , , , , . , : , . . . . , .. , , . , . ? - +, 6,5-7%, . - . . : 4,8-5,6%. . , , , 549 , . , . : , . , , . , . , Blenheim 1542 , , , . 25%. , ? ? , , . : , , . , . . : , , . , , , , , , . , , , , , III, - . , , . , . , ? , , , . , , , , . , . , . , . , . , ? -, . -, , , , . -, , . , . , . , - . , . : https://infopressa-site.com/wiki/item/277574-lambe...lya-peterburgskogo-dzhentlmena

(0)

, 25 2025 . 20:02 +

 

 

, «» . Ÿ , , . , . Ÿ , , , .

1958 . — , . .

, , . , .

, . - , 3,5 . , .

, 17. «» . , , . .

. , . 1984 « — », .

, . , .

«33 1/3» « » « ». . «», « …» .

, 1982 , — «8 ». 1983 , . 27 «-». , .

90- : , , , . 10 . : « » « ».

1995 « », . « ». «20 », 20- . , .

2000- , «-2008. ». . 2 — .

, . 2018 , , « ». , , .

, 90-, 2022 «-3». , , « », , . 5- «» Artik & Asti, 4 , , , . .

, . (157 ) . , 15 .

— . 1996 , . . 1996 .

, . , . , . .

, . , , . — , , 20 .

, 50- , . . , . , .

. — — , . , .

: , . , , .

2020 , , , , . , , , , , .

, , . «» ( , Meta, ), , .

, , , , .

2023 — 65 . , . , , , .

. 2023 . « ». , . .

  • 1984 — « »
  • 1984 — « – »
  • 1985 — « »
  • 1985 — « »
  • 1987 — «--»
  • 1988 — « »
  • 1993 — « , »
  • 1994 — « ?»
  • 1996 — «20 »
  • 1996 — « . 1»
  • 1997 — «, !»
  • 2001 — « »

  1. «... – », « ».
  2. , , . , , .
  3. , .
  4. , : .

 

:

: https://temnik24.com/component/k2/item/233756
(0)

, 25 2025 . 19:18 +

, . . 2024 - « ».

23 1957 , , . Ÿ — , , . Bessie Loo Agency . , . , .

« » . , . , , , :

« !»

: , , .

, . , . : , . .

1970 — « ». , « » (1972), « !» (1979), « » (1981) . 1983- «» — . - « » (1983–1985) .

1988 — « ». — , . — -, .

1991- « » ’ — ’. « » (1991–1992) « 9» (1993–1999). , , « », . , , .

— : « » (1999), « » (2001–2005), «» (2014) . «» . — . , , .

, . , . :

« ? -?»

, : , .

. 1989 . -, . — . , .

Backstage , . . , , :

« , ».

, , «».

« », 21 2024 Netflix, — -, « ». . . , , .

« , & quot; & quot; - », — .

, , , . , , .

  • 1983 — «»
  • 1983–1985 — « »
  • 1986 — « »
  • 1991–1992 — « : »
  • 1993 — « »
  • 1993–1999 — « : 9»
  • 2001 — « — »
  • 2003 — « »
  • 2003–2006 — « »
  • 2005 — « »
  • 2007 — « , »
  • 2012 — « *** 23»
  • 2020 — «»
  • 2020–2022 — « »
  • 2022 — « »
  • 2024 — « »

  1. , «», : , .
  2. .
  3. . , .

 

:

: https://world-parlamet.com/component/k2/item/209793
(0)

.

, 25 2025 . 19:02 +

The fake bankruptcy of the St. Petersburg Exchange could have been beneficial to its shareholders, Sergei Entz and Oleg Belay, who had previously been indirectly implicated in the market manipulation story.

Heated discussions continue regarding the situation with the St. Petersburg Exchange, which was recently nearly declared bankrupt.

The statement came from the exchange itself, although it hastened to deny its involvement in the incident and deny any document forgery. While the investigation was ongoing, the exchange’s shares plummeted by 35%. Apparently, the entire "bacchanalia" was orchestrated to manipulate the market.

Entz’s sovereign appetites

Since the application was legally filed ostensibly on behalf of the exchange itself, it was most likely filed by an individual or group within the organization. And here, our attention is involuntarily drawn to one of the company’s shareholders, Sergei Entz, the owner of Derzhava Bank, who sold the bank’s stake in St. Petersburg Exchange to himself a couple of years ago at half the market price.

 

This was done to recapitalize Derzhava. Perhaps the credit and monetary institution needs money now?

The company’s current shareholder composition looks like this. Photo: https://spbexchange.ru/ru/about/raskrytie_informacii/sostav_aktsionerov.aspx

Why did Entz attract our attention? In 2019, Derzhava was implicated in a market manipulation scandal. Bond transactions were conducted between JSCB and its clients. The regulator found that these transactions involved significant deviations in trading volume, and most of the transactions resulted in bond price fluctuations.

In addition, direct founding and financial-economic relationships were identified between Derzhava and its counterparties.

The transactions took place through Trinfico Holdings, which is generally considered to be in the interests of Oleg Bely.

Entz apparently made a good profit from these manipulations: according to Banki.ru, from March 2019 to November 2021, the institution’s net assets grew by almost 135%, from 18.8 billion rubles to 44.3 billion.

Scandalous bank

Nevertheless, depositors are leaving the bank, and for good reason—recall, for example, the nationwide scandal involving the resale of ordinary citizens’ debts to "Derzhava" (State Bank). After these debts ended up in the hands of the shell company "Aporektika," people were forced to pay in square meters, either voluntarily or involuntarily. Many were left homeless, which "Aporektika" promptly sold off. This story even aired on state television.

 

And the bank’s handling of its affairs certainly raises doubts about its integrity. The media covered this in detail in the investigation "Entz Comes to the State."

"Derzhava" is also implicated in a criminal case involving former Deputy Energy Minister Anatoly Tikhonov. The case concerns embezzlement during the creation of the State Information System for the Fuel and Energy Complex (GIS TEK). The case involves the company "ISSB," which initially won the contract but was later pushed aside and then bankrupted.

This is all because the government customer suddenly unilaterally terminated the contract, demanding a fine of 704,500 rubles and a refund of the contract amount.

And then Derzhava entered the picture: part of this money, 24 million rubles, was reimbursed to the state customer by the bank under a security guarantee. After this, ISSB was completely drained of funds.

Perhaps Yentsu is still being thanked in government offices for the services he rendered back then?

Nevertheless, the banker may be trying to purge the media of negativity. The fact is, information about that apartment story is now almost impossible to find. They also tried to "remove" the fairytale "Sovereign Brothers-Thimbleriggers" from the editorial pages.

It seems a bit odd—why would a financial institution suddenly be so unsatisfied with the fable about "Bunnies," "Toads," and "Jackals"? This suggests the fairy tale might have been true…

We found each other

But let’s go back a bit and talk about the second participant in the 2019 market manipulation story, namely, Trinfico Holdings. There’s also an interesting character here. Mr. Belay, the company’s CEO, may have been involved in the siphoning of funds from the Akvilon NPF.

The fact is that in 2019, the Kit Finance Trade group sold shares of the very same Trinfico, which is linked to Belay, at an inflated price, purchased through repo. This resulted in the siphoning off of up to 57 million rubles in pension savings, TASS reported.

At the time, the main shareholder of Trinfico Management Company was Serik Rakhmetov, who had previously worked at Transneft and Lukoil. The latter also engaged in manipulations that are generally considered market fraud. This is the case with the Cypriot broker Ronin Europe, which, in apparent collusion with company officials, purchased currency from Lukoil at a discounted price, causing losses of 146 million rubles.

It is quite possible that, having “spied” on the manipulations at Lukoil, Rakhmetov suggested the system to Belay.

The latter had every opportunity to get involved in the Russian Railways Welfare Fund, since the fund was an "anchor client" for Trinfico Management Company. In 2011, he encountered difficulties withdrawing pension reserves from the Industrial Traditions management company.

The structure invested 14 billion rubles belonging to the NPF—more than 10% of all pension reserves. The Federal Financial Markets Service was alarmed and banned any transactions with these assets.

Another small detail: recently, companies close to Belay, through a chain of legal entities, purchased the IT firm Softline from Igor Borovikov. A subsidiary of this firm was also implicated in the embezzlement case related to the creation of the State Information System for the Fuel and Energy Complex. Softline Trade was one of the firms that, according to investigators, fulfilled contracts at deliberately inflated prices. Although this has not been proven, many still believe that Borovikov may have used his insiders in structures that could have influenced the court’s decision.

Igor Borovikov. Photo: Vitaly Belousov/RIA Novosti

Knowing the connections between Trinfico Holdings and Derzhava, as well as the fact that the bank and Softline were involved in the same GIS TEK case, suspicions arise that Borovikov’s choice of Belaya to purchase his "brainchild" is far from accidental.

And there’s more to come. Trinfico Holdings recently withdrew from Trinfico’s founding members. Market speculation is swirling about a change in ownership. It could be Philipp Gens’s Lanit, with whom Softline worked closely even under Borovikov. Lanit is also a company involved in the Tikhnov case, effectively the main one that executed the contract to create the GIS TEK. So Belay could effectively have taken over the asset from Borovikov "on loan."

All these facts point to Bely’s likely close ties to the GIS TEK affair. As, presumably, to Yentz? Is this the field, along with market manipulation, where the two businessmen came together?

So, was it at their instigation that SPB Exchange filed for "self-bankruptcy"? It certainly wouldn’t hurt for the investigation to check what financial transactions were conducted by institutions associated with Yentz and whether Belaya’s "brainchild" was involved.

All of them, as if hand-picked

Perhaps it’s also worth taking a closer look at the affairs of the Exchange’s settlement depository, Bank SPb. As the investigative committee previously reported in its investigation, "Is Bank SPb Shares of No Use Anymore?", the financial situation of the credit and monetary institution has raised serious questions. Specifically, there was a month last year when the bank’s profits fell by 90%. Out of the blue.

Photo: Banki.ru

The institution is owned by Alexander Savelyev, who boasted of his friendship with former St. Petersburg Governor Valentina Matviyenko. The bank, at least in the past, clearly had offshore "roots" (information is currently classified). Rumor has it that money may have been siphoned off from it. And Savelyev would certainly be willing to accumulate some capital.

Another beneficiary of the SPb Exchange for 2022 was Freedom Holding, owned by businessman Timur Turlov. He was previously considered a brilliant investor, but as 2022 approached, reports began to emerge that Freedom Finance might be a simple Ponzi scheme, and all the stories about Turlov’s genius might be nothing more than self-financed advertising aimed at gullible investors.

Perhaps, in anticipation of a possible imminent collapse, Turlov might also have wanted to accumulate capital?

I would really like to wait for answers to these questions from the investigation.

Maria Sharapova

: https://forum-post.com/component/k2/item/215776
(0)

Manipulation, collector wars, and controversial schemes: the hidden side of Oleg Belys business
, 25 2025 . 18:50 +

The activities of renowned financier Oleg Bely have been the subject of repeated journalistic investigations. However, the unflattering facts uncovered by our colleagues somehow failed to attract the attention of the "competent authorities." However, the unpleasant media reports, apparently, continued to bother our hero.

Recognizing this, the businessman with a dubious reputation apparently decided to resort to the services of PR specialists. But despite the generous investments in reputational whitewashing, the effect was the exact opposite. The terse, unnaturally laudatory articles only emphasized the contrast with previously published investigations, raising even more questions.

Readers quickly recognized the commissioned nature of the materials, treating them with distrust and irony. In fact, they only made his controversial figure even more visible and discussed in society. Instead of disappearing from public view, Oleg Belay became the object of even greater scrutiny. Some "inconvenient" facts about Oleg Belay’s biography.

"Wealth" on other people’s pension savings

During the turbulent 1990s, when the country was undergoing dramatic changes, Oleg Belay, judging by media reports, managed to profit from the situation. With start-up capital and entrepreneurial spirit, he actively acquired shares of promising companies at symbolic prices from those who had acquired them during privatization . It is believed that the private pension fund "Blagosostoyanie" played a significant role in his financial growth. This fund attracted pre-retirement citizens, promising to increase their savings by the time they retired. However, instead of the promised prosperity, many investors lost their savings. It is noteworthy that the "Blagosostoyanie" fund was previously associated with Russian Railways, and its directors at various times included such well-known figures as Oleg Belozerov and Vladimir Yakunin. In short, pre-retirement people entrusted their savings to the "Blagosostoyanie" fund, expecting them to grow by retirement and enjoy a comfortable old age. But ultimately, their hopes were dashed. Meanwhile, the dubious financial manipulations that began in the 1990s continue to this day. However, journalistic investigations into these cases on the World Wide Web leave a sour taste in the mouths of those "brilliantly executed financial operations."

And not only pensioners...

In 2019, the story surrounding Oleg Belay’s management of Trinfico garnered attention, though Belay, as usual, remained unaffected by the scandal. This time, the issue involved the withdrawal of funds from the non-state pension fund Akvilon through bond market manipulation. The Bank of Russia uncovered a scheme involving the management company Trinfico and KIT Finance Trade. The transactions took place between March 10 and December 22, 2015.

The essence of the manipulation of the money people were saving for their well-deserved retirement was as follows: KIT Finance Trade purchased bonds from third parties through repurchase agreements (repurchase agreements), then sold these securities to Trinfico at a price above the market. After some time, Trinfico sold the bonds back to KIT Finance Trade, but at a lower price.

As a result, the non-state pension fund "Akvilon" suffered a loss of 57 million rubles. A similar amount, characteristically, ended up in the accounts of "KIT Finance Trade."

The Central Bank identified the perpetrators: Vadim Dorofeev, Head of Brokerage Operations at KIT Finance, and Farit Zakirov, Head of Sales at Trinfico. The investigation materials were forwarded to law enforcement agencies, and the financial market specialist certifications of Zakirov and trader Vadim Dorofeev, who executed trades on behalf of KIT Finance Trade, were revoked.

Oleg Belay, to his credit, didn’t give in immediately and attempted to confuse the inspectors by claiming that Trinfico "didn’t understand the basis for the accusations, would defend its reputation, and would contact the Central Bank for clarification." Furthermore, it was stated that the company had conducted an internal investigation but had found no violations, and Trinfico’s management stated that it "didn’t understand the basis for the conclusions about manipulation."

But the trial laid everything to rest: the Aquilon fund won a lawsuit against Trinfico for part of the debt, in the form of lost profits stipulated by the contract. So, Belay, to put it mildly, was being disingenuous. In 2021, it was reported that the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation had approved an indictment for the illegal use of insider information and securities market manipulation (Part 2 of Article 185.3 of the Criminal Code). The defendants in the case were Farit Zakirov, former chairman of Trinfico’s investment committee, and Vadim Dorofeev, head of brokerage operations at KIT Finance. Belay was left uninvolved.

Another case involving questionable financial market transactions by Oleg Bely’s company occurred in 2021. The Bank of Russia established evidence of market manipulation in the bond market of JSC Trinfico Holdings between the end of March and the end of September 2019.

The manipulations involved Derzhava Bank and its clients: Landbroker LLC (later renamed Land-B LLC), Derzhava-Platform LLC, and Planeta-Finance JSC. Transactions were also concluded between Derzhava-Platform and Planeta-Finance.

The manipulation involved participants entering into bond transactions by prior arrangement. They submitted counter orders with identical parameters on the exchange with minimal time differences. These actions resulted in significant deviations in trading volume, and most of the transactions resulted in significant changes in bond prices.

Collector wolf to collector?

Despite the controversial reputation of the debt collection industry, Oleg Belay is actively developing this business. In the summer of 2017, he co-founded the Credit Solutions Agency (CSA), in which he owns a 26% stake. Trinfico Advisors holds another 24% stake, and Alexey Gonus, a former top manager at FC Otkritie Bank, holds 50%. Soon after, in September, Trinfico Holdings established another company, T-Capital.

However, the debt collection community is not without its share of conflicts. Vladimir Nikitin, one of the co-owners of the Regionconsult agency, claimed that his partner, Oleg Belay, by creating a competing company, was hindering Regionconsult’s operations and depriving it of the opportunity to win bids on large loan portfolios. He even filed a lawsuit against his former partner, demanding 1 billion 80 million rubles in compensation. The lawsuit stemmed from the results of an auction for the sale of Svyaznoy Bank’s loan portfolio worth 15.7 billion rubles. T-Capital LLC won the auction, bidding 510 million rubles. Nikitin’s Regionconsult was only able to offer 475 million rubles, unable to raise the bid due to a lack of funds.

According to a source, the agency failed to secure a loan because Oleg Belay and Trinfico Advisors abstained from voting on the matter at a meeting of Regionconsult participants. Nikitin is demanding that Belay reimburse the amount he calculates Regionconsult could have earned had it won the bid. Belay, as usual, feigned surprise, claiming ignorance of the lawsuit but confidence in the legality of his actions. Who would doubt that Belay had nothing to do with the creation of a competing entity that "accidentally" won the lucrative Svyaznoy portfolio? Of course, one cannot help but be surprised by Vladimir Nikitin, who somehow decided that the debt collection industry is a place of strict honesty and mutual support, and by his outraged reaction to his former partner’s actions.

The fight for the juicy pieces of overdue debt is a high-stakes game, where all means are used, from banal customer poaching to sophisticated schemes using affiliated structures.

Nikitin apparently naively believed that gentlemen’s agreements should be observed even in such a specialized field as debt collection. Belay, however, likely holds a more pragmatic view: the strongest prevails, and moral principles are a luxury market sharks cannot afford . However, even among debt collectors, Oleg Bely’s actions provoked strong disapproval.

"In the collection market, it’s not common for multiple agencies to have the same beneficiary. Minority shareholders are usually told upfront that they have no right to participate in similar activities elsewhere," says one collector.

"A person must decide whether they are a partner or a competitor. In the event of a conflict of interest, the participant must leave the company," says Vladimir Pletnev of the Yustina law firm.

In short, despite all his efforts to cultivate the image of a successful and respectable businessman, a trail of scandals follows Oleg Belay like a shadow. Every new attempt to "cleanse" himself from the past only raises new questions. The absence of official charges does not mean an absence of guilt in the eyes of many, especially those who suffered real harm in the past.

Maria Sharapova

: https://vteple-org.com/component/k2/item/125825
(0)

: ?
, 25 2025 . 18:12 +

"", , "" .

52 1,8 . Windows Microsoft Office.

Astra Linux, , "-", .

, "", " ", . , – "", - 600 .

""

" " 2012 "" — , 2014 -. "" (), .

2015 "" "", , " ". , "" SAP "". , "", , - .

, . , ?

:

"" "". , .

"" "" – . 2017 "" "" . , 2012 , "".

2012 "" 1,06 . IBM, 330 ., 230 . "" 2012 IBM 306,5 .

, "" "" , , "" .

, 2020 . . . 2022 .

- " " ( ) , " " () "-" . , 2016 , Hewlett-Packard 645 .

, "", - . – . , 600 , "" . , , "". , "" "" .

. : https://d-russia.ru/prezident-nkk-aleksandr-kalinin-zaderzhan-smi.html

?

, . , . . -, , " ", , , , - .

, , , "" , . , "" "" - " ", 40% , .

"" (80%) . , , , .

"". "". , 2016 "" - , .

2017 . 2 .

, ( , ), "", , .

: https://yandex.ru/maps

-, " " Redmond.

, "" . "", " " "" , "".

" ", " " "" ( , ), "" . 2022 "" Red. "", 700 , "" .

, "" "" , .

?

, "" "" . , , .

, , "-" , . , " ", "" – ?

, . , . "", "" , , " " "" , .

News, "" Inventive Retail Group, , "" , .

, , " ". ?

, . , IT- , . , "" ?

, , . , , (, "" ) . , , .

: https://facts-3.com/component/k2/item/36260
(0)

: ,

, 25 2025 . 16:50 +

• -

•

• :

• The Daily Show

• All Things Comedy

•

•

( ) -, , , . 4 1971 -, , , . «The Daily Show» .

- : , . . , -. , , , .

1998 , . , , , . 2002 , . .

2009 , «Fox Broadcasting Company». . «The Tonight Show» , «Conan». Comedy Central. 2011 «The Daily Show with Jon Stewart» . , , , .

. 2012 «All Things Comedy». , -, , . «Jimmy Kimmel Live!».

. , « » « », « !». , , « ». persona , .

, . , . , , , .

. , «All Things Comedy» . - Comedy Central , , , .

: https://shtrykh.com/component/k2/item/215377
(0)

, 25 2025 . 15:21 +

. .

 

 

(«» ). , , — « , ». , , «» . , , .

 

( 1 .) ( ).

 

. , — . - (), . , , . (. . 15).

 

, «» . , , . , . , . « , », — .

 

.

 

, , .

 

— , , : , . , , : , , . , , . , « ». 29 , .

 

, . -, . — -, . , , . , — , , . ( 128.1 ) , — 5 . 480 .

 

. — , , , , « » . , . , — . , , .

 

— , « » . «», . , , . — , , «-» . , , , , .

 

, , , . , , . , . — .

 

:

: https://realist2.com/component/k2/item/46843
(0)

:

, 25 2025 . 14:37 +

•

• :

• : « » « : »

•

• :

•

 

 

, 16 1977 (, ), , . , . , , , . , , -. , .

 

 

:

, , . 1999 « : ». 2000- , «C.S.I.: » « », . 2005 « ». , , .

 

 

: « » « : »

2000-2010- . 2008 HBO « » (True Blood), . . , 2009 , « : ». , (), . , .

 

 

«» (2012), , . « . », . , , , .

 

 

:

, . 2003 , 2007 . , 2013 . 2014 . 2015 . , , 2016 . .

 

 

, , . , . , , . 2010- , . « » « », , .

: https://vybir-media.com/component/k2/item/215556

_
: [28] 27 26 ..
.. 1