I have. I have gone through all the phases: aspirant, Selected, finalist, winner and even member of this jury on many occasions. And, believe me, watching SEO competitions from another hand eliminates many prejudices and anxieties.

However, SEO contests are rigged!

If you are among those who think that they never win Since SEO competitions are given ahead, you are confused. Look at me, I really don't have a plug everywhere and I've managed to win sometime. Additionally, I will guarantee you that, in the juries I've engaged in, the process was transparent, driven exclusively by standards of SEO quality.

However, you don't need to be naive either. Behind some of the Best-endowed prizes there are interests which have little to do with literature (at least, that's what several writers I have talked to have explained ). Unfortunately, all these are also tough to win. Why? Since they're presented with professional writers. And by"professionals" I don't mean"celebrities. There are hundreds of anonymous professional authors who are light years apart from being multimillionaires, but that live off their art precisely because they triumph several search engine optimization prizes per year.

That's why it's important to choose the decorations you present yourself. If you're a newcomer, how about starting with the regional SEO contests? Even prizes that are in their first editions along with also the participation is not yet enormous. Search engine optimization prizes from small towns are not usually badly compensated and are much more affordable. Or perhaps you wish to try those where the decoration is to be published, so people will finally read for you. There are SEO competitions of all kinds, as Víctorio Pajuo describes in this guide, and according to your objectives, you've got to present yourself to others or some. Explore and surprise yourself. It's going be SEO competitions... there is a good deal of these every month!

Gratitude, ask yourself if the story you present has a real prospect of winning, since I, who've been on the other side performing the sifting, have seen errors that you would not think. And I'm going to let you know about them so you do not fall for them. There they go.

ERRORS OF BULGE

1. Failure to comply with the Bases

Carefully the principles, which can be to get some thing. By simply complying with them to the correspondence, you have a better prospect of winning than you believe. It's incredible how many men and women pass them by. No expansion, no typeface, maybe not even the subject! They send anything they need and, ale, let us see if we're lucky! And no, of course there isn't. If a participant does not bother to read the principles, the jury doesn't bother to read his text, that simple. That his story was great? Too bad, he sent her to the wrong competition.

2. Not understanding the principles of Grammar and punctuation

It Appears obvious, but it's not: to win a SEO contest you Need to know how to compose. Come on, the basics: putting letters together in line with the principles of grammar and combining words with significance. Many, most, present stories full of flaws. Tildes? Comas? Pa' what? And because the jury is not there to decipher hieroglyphics, they're removed without contemplation.

When You're a jury and you've got over fifty tales That don't obey the principles and, moreover, are full of faults, you no longer know whether to laugh or cry.

Between the unfulfilled bases as well as the flaws, a large part Of those participants are left out of the competition. Those who pass the initial sieve belong to some minority. But that's when things become complicated...

STYLISTIC ERRORS

3. Not taking care of fashion

A Fantastic writer is one who describes the complex with simple words. Whereas a terrible writer, or inexperienced writer, is one who attempts to show off using a verbiage filled with grandiloquent words. They reload the paragraphs in such a manner it is almost impossible to know what the story best SEO contest uwelcome2019 is all about. I'm sorry to say that if you make that mistake and the jury should pick up a dictionary to follow you, they won't think you're too clever, they'll think you're too pedantic and dull.

However, you do not need to go to the other extreme either: Simple doesn't mean simple. A story that does not have these stylistic errors makes the difference. Therefore, one of the most essential steps before submitting your story to some search engine optimization contest is to spend a lot of time adjusting your personality, so the words which stay are just and necessary. You do not know just how much the jury will thank you for it.

STRUCTURAL ERRORS

4. The beginning is boring

There is a great deal of focus on the fact that the Opening sentence must be especially good. I really don't think that it's vital for a narrative to be outstanding, but it should not be anodyne either. And this error is especially bleeding in a brief story or a micro narrative, in which every word counts. Too many.

Placing at a short story is generally a mistake. You likely hate it when your neighbor informs you about the weather at the elevator, especially when he warns you that it's raining when you see yourself in suspenders and together with your own umbrella under your arm. Well, the same thing happens on your story: Why does it really matter that it was cloudy or the sun was shining?

That information extends to books. For frills, it's advised that everything narrated should play a part in the narrative. The topical physical descriptions, the critique of all the protagonists' clothes, the part of the time in every chapter... sleep the reader and, don't doubt it, the jury of the search engine optimization competition.

5. A Lousy development

Then you will find the participants that have very internalized The initial shocking term, however, they're unable to maintain the level during the rest of the text. You are able to observe they had a good story, but they did not know how to let it. Too bad.

As Vicente Marco stated in the interview I did, The most original argument from the world is useless if you don't fancy the plot nicely. My recommendation is that you don't attempt to be a breaker if you have not mastered the fundamental tools yet. A typical well-told narrative will be interesting to the jury in relation to a very original one which is badly developed. The jury isn't likely to evaluate your good intentions, but the final result.

There are also people who believe that a short story is to Summarize a longer story or tell an anecdote, so their text lacks story tension. Or the participants that recreate themselves in reflections with no story as a common thread. In all these scenarios, the problem is that they have not known that stories and micro stories must have their own thing: they are not the brothers of a novel nor a few beautiful and deep phrases. They need to tell a whole story in a couple of words, and that's where the complication lies.

6. Failed end

The terrible thing about a good beginning and a Fantastic development is That when the end is not up to the task, it disappoints. Only those who make the 3 components attractive can win the prize.

What mistakes do novice writers frequently make at the end of Their stories?

Explain the narrative: Yes, more than one can. That denotes Insecurity on the part of the writer, who wishes to make it clear that his story had a thickness that, possibly, the jury hasn't managed to see. Now, the jury could respond in two ways: if they'd known the complexity of the story, they will ask them to describe it to them, along with the player will lose several points, or even all of them; and when they had not seen it for themselves (and, even so, it's possible they would have enjoyed the story)they will realise that the writer did not understand how to transmit the thoughts he was trying to communicate... and they will also subtract points from it.

Conclusion: never explain the end, make an attempt to be clear through the text. Or leave doors open for each reader to think what they desire, which is considerably more suggestive.

Recurring to the joke: You already have to do it very well To make it amusing. The dual meanings are extremely well seen. What did it seem like you're talking about your girlfriend, but you're speaking to your car? Well, that is not surprising , in fact, it is possible to see it coming from afar. A narrative that's reduced to the final joke is readily forgotten, it won't ever stay in the mind of the prosecution, after dozens and dozens of stories .

Sentimentalism: Sometimes it works, Extra resources however, from my standpoint View, a short story doesn't give time to produce the essential atmosphere to Move with a last twist which touches the fiber. It is dangerous, if not Counterproductive, to overdo meaninglessness or play. Of narrative, everything has to be very quantified so as to not cause the opposite Result: rather than stirring, repelling.