-

  • (9)
  • (5)
  • (4)
  • (4)
  • (3)
  • (3)
  • (0)

 -

   Truman_Capote

 - e-mail

 

 -

 -

 LiveInternet.ru:
: 26.02.2007
: 23
: 28
: 54

:

.


: (5), (3), (3), (0), (4), (4)
(4)

, 05 2007 . 21:02 +
Teina_TO (Truman_Capote)

– . , , ozon.ru, , – .


, ; , , – .


– , - , , – - - .


« », , , , , - . , « » – , , , « » . , , , , , , – , , , , , . , , .


« » - , , , . , 1970- « » , , , – , . , « », . : – , , , , , – , : , .


– - . , , , . « » - , , , , .


() afisha.mail.ru



(0)

" ."

, 28 2007 . 15:46 +
Teina_TO (Truman_Capote)
, " " ,– , . , " " , . , , , , .
" "
1943 .


(0)

, 28 2007 . 15:27 +
Teina_TO (Truman_Capote)

« », , « », 2004 . «-». , , , .  

, -. ? , ? «, - ». , . , , , , . , . , , - , - , . « , », , « », , . - - :
, ,

- .

 




(1)

" "

, 02 2007 . 22:21 +
Teina_TO (Truman_Capote)

For Capote, Breakfast at Tiffany's was a turning point, as he explained to Roy Newquist (Counterpoint, 1964):

I think I've had two careers. One was the career of precocity, the young person who published a series of books that were really quite remarkable. I can even read them now and evaluate them favorably, as though they were the work of a stranger... My second career began, I guess it really began with Breakfast at Tiffany's. It involves a different point of view, a different prose style to some degree. Actually, the prose style is an evolvement from one to the other—a pruning and thinning-out to a more subdued, clearer prose. I don't find it as evocative, in many respects, as the other, or even as original, but it is more difficult to do. But I'm nowhere near reaching what I want to do, where I want to go. Presumably this new book is as close as I'm going to get, at least stylistically.



(0)

, 28 2007 . 15:05 +



(0)

, 22 2007 . 13:15 +


(0)

.

, 04 2007 . 22:16 +


(2)

,

, 09 2007 . 22:30 +
Teina_TO (Truman_Capote)

,
;
,
,


;

,
.


(8)

, 07 2007 . 11:09 +
Teina_TO (Truman_Capote)  (200x342, 23Kb)

" – , , « ». , «» .

, , . , , , «». , . . . – , , , . . – . – «», ( , , ). , . , . – , . . . «».

, . , . , , , , «» . « », , . , .

, , , « » - . – , , . . . (, , ?) . , , ."





 : [1]