-Ïîèñê ïî äíåâíèêó

Ïîèñê ñîîáùåíèé â rss_planet_mozilla

 -Ïîäïèñêà ïî e-mail

 

 -Ïîñòîÿííûå ÷èòàòåëè

 -Ñòàòèñòèêà

Ñòàòèñòèêà LiveInternet.ru: ïîêàçàíî êîëè÷åñòâî õèòîâ è ïîñåòèòåëåé
Ñîçäàí: 19.06.2007
Çàïèñåé:
Êîììåíòàðèåâ:
Íàïèñàíî: 7


Mark Surman: Participation questions?

Âîñêðåñåíüå, 01 Ôåâðàëÿ 2015 ã. 19:35 + â öèòàòíèê

What is radical participation? I asked this question early last month. Since then I’ve collected comments from my blog and from dozens of conversations. The result was more — and better – questions. Like:

  • Do we need radical new approaches, or a return to our roots? (Axel, Greg)
  • Can we use ‘the promise of impact’ to draw in the best contributors? (Ian)
  • How do people do *new* things under the Mozilla banner? (Ian + others)
  • Can we make participation in core product work easier? (Lawrence, Gregory)
  • Does staff vs. volunteer binary limit us? Other models to consider? (Mark)
  • What’s the best way to get new contributors aligned and effective? (Elio)
  • Is there ow hanging fruit we can fix (e.g. contribute.mozilla.org)? (Martin)

Responses have been positive: the consensus is that Mozilla needs to double down on participation. However, the meatier part of my interactions with people have been around more specific questions like the ones above.

These questions feel like a good place to dig in. I’m going to tackle a few of them in follow up posts over the next couple of weeks. If there is a question that interests you, I encourage you to dig in on your own blog.


Filed under: mozilla

https://commonspace.wordpress.com/2015/02/01/participation-questions/


 

Äîáàâèòü êîììåíòàðèé:
Òåêñò êîììåíòàðèÿ: ñìàéëèêè

Ïðîâåðêà îðôîãðàôèè: (íàéòè îøèáêè)

Ïðèêðåïèòü êàðòèíêó:

 Ïåðåâîäèòü URL â ññûëêó
 Ïîäïèñàòüñÿ íà êîììåíòàðèè
 Ïîäïèñàòü êàðòèíêó