-

 -

  •     - - . : Internet Explorer 6, Fire Fox 1.5, Opera 9.5, Safari 3.1.1 JavaScript.

 -

 - -

 -

   Roger_Federer

 - e-mail

 

 -

 LiveInternet.ru:
: 23.07.2008
:
:
: 2583

:

Press.


: Off court(31), News(186), Interviews(202), Fan-Art(12), About Roger(24)
(0)

:

, 23 2009 . 00:12 +
About Roger
Press

:  
(2)

, 23 2009 . 19:53 +
coluchka (Roger_Federer)

«» , . , .

7:5, .

83- 61- . 24- , 13 , .

http://www.sports.ru/tennis/26910599.html

 (518x700, 103Kb)

Press

:  
(0)

. 2

, 09 2009 . 20:09 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) , .



.

http://www.sports.ru/tribuna/blogs/nitkina/39386.html
Press

(1)

. 1

, 08 2009 . 19:28 +
Press

(3)

, ?

, 31 2009 . 14:11 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) , , . .



sports.ru
Press

(3)

: , !

, 28 2009 . 19:31 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer)

, . “ , . , . , , - , - ,” - .

, . “ - 60- , 70-80- - , - 90-, - . , , . ? - ! , ,” - .

http://www.gotennis.ru/news/?p=22848#more-22848

Press

(0)

, 28 2009 . 19:28 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer)

: hcfoo.com

, . , 100:1 , - .

Bild, 25:1 - « », 50:1 – «» 200:1, .

, - Bild , - . - 15- , - 2002 WTA- 76 .

  ,   - Twitter : “ ! 2029-2040 ”.

, ,    -… 20 .

: , “” . ,  .

 

http://www.gotennis.ru/news/?p=22642
Press

(1)

, 25 2009 . 20:31 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) - Twitter : ! 2029-2040 .
Press

(3)

, !

, 24 2009 . 21:05 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) . .

, - , 15 . .

, - , 2000 , .

31- , , 2001 76- . WTA , - . .

, . , 5 27- 5:7, 7:6 (8:6), 7:6 (7:5), 3:6, 16:14, .

!

Eurosport
Press

(0)

, 23 2009 . 00:17 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) Rogers Cup, 10 16 , , .

, . 31 , , 12 . , , 8 28- .

, . , , , .

, - . .

. , - , .
Press

(4)

, 17 2009 . 13:31 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) , - . 1 5, .



sports.ru
Press

(1)

:

, 17 2009 . 13:28 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) , , .

. , , , , , - .
Press

(0)

, 15 2009 . 21:00 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) :

What we ended up with instead was tennis's equivalent to the Beatles in Roger Federer, and the more I think about the parallel the more it apt it seems. Let's stretch the analogy to the breaking point: in tennis we have the Beatles vs. Rolling Stones reprised in the Federer vs. Rafael Nadal rivalry. Almost everyone in the baby boomer generation fell into either the Beatles or Rolling Stones camp, although if you were insufficiently fanatical you gotto enjoy both. Being more than adequately fanatical, I was a Stones man myself, and wrote the Beatles off for good after that much ballyhooed White Album.

So naturally, Pete was asked about the Federer-Nadal rivalry - specifically, if he felt that Roger could be considered the Greatest of All Time if he can't establish superiority over his career rival (as Sampras did in his rivaly with Andre Agassi). You'll see from Pete's answer that he was slightly flummoxed, but one of his outstanding qualities always was his determination to honest, even if it meant delivering his opinion or thoughts through clenched teeth.

"I do understand the argument as far as being the best ever. You have to be the man of your generation. He (Roger) has come up short against Nadal. I can see the point. It's hard to answer that. I don't know how to answer it.You know, it's not done yet. Roger's career isn't done yet. He's going to play Nadal a number of times over the next number of years, and he has to beat him. He has to beat him in the finals of majors. To be considered the greatest ever, he certainly in my book is (already that). But he has to figure this kid out. He has to beat him. He's lost to him a number of times. You know, you got to be the man of your generation. He certainly is the man of his generation; he just has to figure out Nadal."

Pushed to elaborate vis a vis his own experience wih Agassi, Pete added:

"Well, God, you're giving it some thought, huh (laughter)? It would have bothered me if I had a losing record against Andre in majors. It wouldn't have sat well with me. Did it mean I was the greatest or not the greatest? I don't know. It's the debate of greatest of all time. We so badly wantto pin it on someone. With the numbers you have to give it to Roger. His record against Nadal, okay, you might not give it to him.

"I mean, if I was 7-15 against Andre and I was done, it's hard to say I was the player of my generation - just because he got the best of me. Like I said, the story's not over yet. We have another probably three, four years of these two guys competing against each other. If anything, I think Nadal is goingto be hungrier now, seeing Roger getting back to No. 1. It's hard to give you a definitive answer when it's not done yet. I think Roger knows he's got to figure out this kid. It's a tough, tough matchup. Nadal is one of the few guys that believes in himself that he's better than Roger."

:

You may remember that in his Wimbledon press conference, Rod Laver took the position that in one match, on grass, he would pick Sampras over Federer. Laver wasn't the only one who took that tack. Just a few weeks ago, John McEnroe told me, "Watching these guys today, I keep thinking that if Sampras walked out there, hed still drive these guys bananas.In my opinion hes still the greatest fast court-player who ever lived. Where Roger is the greatest, period."

I asked Sampras about that, too. He said:

"Well, I think one thing Roger doesn't see on grass the last number of years is really a true serve-and- volleyer, someone that's willing to come in and put the pressure on and make him pass, make him return these big serves. I don't think anyone really scares him. I think my game would makeRoger a little bit more uncomfortable. I would obviously come in on both serves and put the pressure on his backhand, sort of go from there. . . I would sort of dictate the play. But, you know, he'd be a tough guyto break, especially when he's hitting 50 aces like he did (in the recent Wimbledon final). It would have been a great matchup.

"If I would beat him? If I felt my best on grass, I did feel unbeatable, especially in the mid '90s. I was a tough guy to break, played well from the back court to have chances, and I moved well enough. It's a flattering comment. Do I think I could have beaten Roger in my prime? Sure. I don't think anyone could beat me in my prime on grass. I felt as Roger does now - he feels unbeatable."

Press

(3)

.

, 11 2009 . 15:18 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer)
 " " -

14:00 06/07/2009 " , , " ", ", - . ", " ", ".>>

Press

(0)

, 07 2009 . 14:10 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) . . , . , !

. , , . , . , , , , . , .

, , , . . . . . , - , , , . , , .

. 2-0 , 6-2 -, , , . . , . , , . , , , , , .

. -, . , . . . . , . -, .

, , -, , , , . . , . , , US Open. , . . , , , , .

http://www.sports.ru/blog/chesnokov/16953906.html
Press

(2)

, 07 2009 . 14:05 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) .

, . , . , . 90 , , . .

, , . . , , . , . , . . , . , , , . .

, 6 . , , , , . , . , . . , , , , , , . 15 , , . , , , .
Press

(0)

:

, 06 2009 . 21:05 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) , BBC.

, - . 27 , , - .

, . , - .

, , .

, - , . , - , , , ( - . Eurosport.ru ), - , .

, - , - .

, , , 15 .

http://www.eurosport.ru/tennis/wimbledon/2009/story_sto1994575.shtml
 (317x238, 11Kb)
Press

:  
(0)

, 06 2009 . 20:28 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) 15- Grand Slam, .



eurosport.ru
Press

(0)

sports.ru

, 06 2009 . 20:25 +
Jul1Jul (Roger_Federer) , . , . , , , -, , .

...
Press

(0)

:

, 06 2009 . 17:04 +
coluchka (Roger_Federer)

-2009 : , , , ... , , , "15" .

crazy – . - 6:2 . 17- . .
 

– , , , ?
- , . , . , . . , , . , . - , . . , .

- , , , ?
- , , , . , 0:2 , , , . 0:2 , , .

- ?
- . . . " ", . – , . , . . , . , , . , . . , , .

- , . , , , : " "?
- . .

- - - ?
- , – . , , . , , , , . , , , . . , , . , , . . – , , , , .

- , " ". 15-?
- . . (). . , . , . , , 1 . , . , , . , , .

- " " . 15- . . , - ?
- , . , , . , . . , . , . , . , , , . - , , , , . - , . , , , . , . , . , , - . . . . . , , .

- .
- : "", . , , ( ).

- 15 – . ?
- , , , , . , - . , , . , . , . , , . , . . . , 6 , .

- ?
- " . ".

- , , , ?
- , , - . .

http://www.championat.ru/tennis/article-35463.html

 

Interviews
Press


 : 5 [4] 3 2 1